Category Archives: Language

1 Thessalonians 5:1-11 – Stay awake and sober for when the day of the Lord will come [Twenty-fourth Sunday after Pentecost]

Now concerning the times and the seasons, brothers and sisters, you do not need to have anything written to you. For you yourselves know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. When they say, “There is peace and security,” then sudden destruction will come upon them, as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and there will be no escape! But you, beloved, are not in darkness, for that day to surprise you like a thief; for you are all children of light and children of the day; we are not of the night or of darkness. So then let us not fall asleep as others do, but let us keep awake and be sober; for those who sleep sleep at night, and those who are drunk get drunk at night. But since we belong to the day, let us be sober, and put on the breastplate of faith and love, and for a helmet the hope of salvation. For God has destined us not for wrath but for obtaining salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us, so that whether we are awake or asleep we may live with him. Therefore encourage one another and build up each other, as indeed you are doing.

——————————————————————————————————–

This is the Epistle selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for Year A, Proper 28, the twenty-fourth Sunday after Pentecost. This will next be read aloud in church on Sunday, November 19, 2017. It is important as it echoes the theme of being prepared for everlasting life, as was seen in the parables of the Ten Bridesmaids and the Rich Fool.

The selected reading from the fifth chapter of Paul’s first letter to the Christians of Thessaly begins with the capitalized Greek word “Peri,” followed by the conjunction “de.” This has been translated as, “Now concerning,” which is a reversal of the written words’ order, rather than literally translating, “Concerning now.” Certainly, this translation reflects translation via standard syntax; but standard syntax misses the subtle intent of capitalization, which places a need to focus some importance onto the word “Peri.”

The word “peri” means, “about, concerning,” and “around,” which “denotes place, cause or subject.” Its implied usage infers, “consideration where ‘all the bases are covered.’” As such, the important focus by the capitalization of this states, “Circumstances now” or “Conditions on top of.”

Because 1 Thessalonians 4:18 (reviewed in the Proper 27 lesson) ended chapter four with a plea to continue teaching the value of being in possession of the Holy Spirit, prior to death, chapter five is then referencing that plea and that message.  This beginning is then stating these are the “Conditions on top of” that prior statement. This next chapter is then adding focus on the “Circumstances now,” which were surrounding Apostles who were filled with the Holy Spirit. While that is also reflected in stating, “Now concerning,” there is something lacking in such an, “Oh, by the way” introduction.

This introduction then refers to “the times and the seasons,” which sounds reminiscent of the song found in Ecclesiastes 3:1-8, made popular by The Birds, with their song “Turn, Turn, Turn” (1965).

The two key words her are “chronōn” and “kairōn” (rooted in “chronos” and “kairos”), which can also state, “durations” and “opportunities.” This means the “Circumstances” that are “next” for those in their positions as Apostles is to look at how long (“times”) they have to serve the LORD, with their new purpose being to seek new believers to bring to Christ (the “opportunities”). Thus, this chapter places focus on that “time” and “purpose’ each Apostle has, relative to preaching the Gospel, and does not reflect an estimation of when one’s “time” is up.

Because Paul then addressed the whole body of Christians in Thessaly as “brothers,” then “the times and the purposes” or “the durations and the opportunities” were those only held by bodies holding the risen Lord (Christ Jesus) within (meaning male and female Thessalonians were “brothers in Christ,” as Jesus reborn). That holy presence, coming with the Christ Mind, means there was “no need to have written” a checklist of “Apostle To-dos” or a schedule for what “times” one should go to church and what “seasons” does a Church recognize, denoted by when it is appropriate to wear robes of green, white, red, purple, black, pink (rose), gold and blue.

Above all, Paul (via the Holy Spirit) was not indicating the Christian Thessalonians thought someone should tell them when they would die and write that in a letter. The deeper meaning is the written Mosaic Laws are no longer external to them, for them to memorize and forcibly follow. The presence of God in their hearts has written His acceptable ways in their hearts.

The translation, “For you yourselves know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night,” is shown to be three segments in the Greek text. The dividing points come after a statement that confirms the presence of the LORD within, such that is states, “Yourselves fully know that day of the LORD.” The love of God and His marriage to them, in their hearts, has become “that day of the Lord,” meaning there is no need to follow “cookbook” rules that will make “that day” be in the future. Thus, following a comma (written or implied) is the statement “as a thief in night.” This becomes read separately, as the day of the LORD being when they had their darkness of night was stolen from them.

The final segment of this verse concludes, “in this way comes.” That “manner” is then the “stealth” in which God transforms one from a mortal born of death (“the night”), to a soul with the promise of eternity that become “known” on “that day of the LORD.”

Of course, the double entendre (dual meaning) speaks of “night” as the “time” of death, which is not foretold “in writing.” The “day of the LORD” becomes the “light” of awareness when the soul meets face-to-face with God, who takes the soul “like a thief.’ The factor of “night” becomes representative of the “time” of death.

In verse 3, where the translation is “When they say, “There is peace and security,” the second segment (in quotation marks) is “Eirēnē kai asphaleia,” where the capitalization leads to those referenced (as “they”) saying, “Peace and security.”The presence of capitalization is important to recognize.

It is also worthwhile to know that “eirēnē” was used as an “invocation of peace [as] a common Jewish farewell, in the Hebraistic sense of the health (welfare) of an individual.” Capitalizing this word then infers someone pronouncing “I am healthy and well.” This becomes similar to the common thoughts of mortals, as stating, “I am so good that God has rewarded me physically, with good health.” The word “asphaleia” then adds to that proclamation of physical health the “reliability, firmness, and safety,” which (again) are thought to be from the good graces of YaHWeH.

For Paul to write that to Christians in Thessaly, who undoubtedly were a mix of former Jews and former Gentiles, such words were understood to be those commonly expressed. They were catchphrases, rather than deep beliefs. People of professed faith, who think they have been blessed by God (due to the comfort of their status and position) can then pretend to be a god with a catchy farewell.  This gives the impression: “As I have peace and security, I give you a pinch of that peace and security to keep as your own.”

The same can be said as happening to this day, especially when an Episcopal service comes to the point of “The Peace.” The priest motions everyone to rise, and says, “May the peace of the Lord be with you,” to which the congregations replies, “And also with you.” I expect we do it today because they did it yesterday.

Now, that is all well and fine, IF everyone knows what that means and means what that says.

Myself, not being a “cradle to grave” Episcopalian, I was not confirmed in the Episcopal Church until the ripe old age of fifty-something. After the ceremonial proceedings, the Bishop spoke with me privately, while the others were leaving the nave. He shook my hand and said, “May the peace of the Lord be with you.”

When I heard that, I was thinking, “Wow. That was so nice of the Bishop to say that … to wish me well.” So, I replied, “Thank you.”

As he was walking up the aisle to leave it struck me, “Idiot, that was an Episcopal catchphrase.” As soon as I realized my mistake, I hollered out to the Bishop, “And also with you!”

He didn’t look back; but he kinda waved his left hand to the side, letting me know he heard. Maybe he didn’t want me to see him trying not to laugh?

That becomes symbolic of what Paul was writing; as people think saying the right things is all they have to do to get to Heaven. However, Paul then wrote, “Then sudden destruction will come upon them, as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and there will be no escape!” This says that talking a good game is no replacement for sacrificing your Big Brain for the love of God and the Mind of Christ.

When that self-sacrifice is done, then” you do not need to have anything written to you” to memorize as a farewell.  A catchphrase is an automatic statement that comes without out deep thought and meaning.  “Peace and security” implies “I already have this, which only works when that is the truth.

To follow that up with, “sudden destruction will come” means “ruin, doom, destruction, and death” has just been wished upon oneself, simply from thinking one is prepared to enjoy life because God loves him or her, and not doing the will of the LORD. That meaning of “destruction” comes from the Greek word “olethros,” which also “emphasizes the consequent loss that goes with the complete “undoing.”’ One is thus undoing all of their pleasant thoughts of health and safety by boasting about you being well-to-do.  All the counting of one’s chickens before they have hatched will have been “undone” by having the gall to think God loves you so much that He is your slave.

Now, in the verse where it says, “as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman,” this too is spoken with dual meaning intended. First is the obvious, which is “labor pains” come suddenly, when a “pregnant woman” is due to give birth to a baby. Their onset becomes a ‘drop everything’ mentality, with going into rush mode an immediate response. For a lot of married couples who are pregnant, the parents-to-be practice for that time when action needs to be quick. When it is time to react swiftly, looking up something in a book or calling someone to ask what to do is not the best way to get moving.

Second, which is a deeper meaning, relates to my having said prior that all mortal human beings are called to be the brides of God. God wants to impregnate both males and females with His Holy Spirit; but God is not going to rape anyone that refuses to get engaged and become married to Him (in Spirit). Therefore, the metaphor means the “destruction” of death will come suddenly, because mortal human beings (males and females) became “pregnant” from their own rejections of God and Christ.

There is a vulgar saying that involves a word beginning with “F” and involves “yourself.” Consider that the secret second meaning here.

Still, the Greek words only imply a “pregnant woman,” which is the translation provided by the New American Standard Bible (NASB). The actual Greek text says, “ōdin en gastri echousē.” The closest that comes to “labor pains upon a pregnant woman” is as “the pain of childbirth to her [feminine “the”] in the belly holding.” The actual birth of a baby or child is implied, but not said.

A viable alternate translation can be, “the acute pain to her in the stomach having.” This then becomes a reference to a woman that has not become pregnant, as the sudden announcement from “her belly” that mensuration is about to begin sloughing and unused egg. As metaphor, males can know this “sudden pain in the gut” after eating some bad food.

The point is to not get caught up in looking for ways that, “This cannot be a worry for me,” as Paul was not trying to tell of pregnant women suddenly dying. The comparison is to how the state of “death comes so quickly” that “there can be no escape.”

In verse 4, Paul again refers to the recipients of his letter as “brothers.” The translation as “beloved” recognizes a familial relationship, in the same way that John wrote that Jesus loved Mary Magdalene, Martha, John, and Lazarus. The actual identification as “brothers” says Jesus had been reborn in each and all.  The new persona became their escape from the sudden throes of death.

Paul then stated Apostles (males and females) “were not in darkness.” That means they had been elevated from the level of mortal sinner (where darkness always exists) to righteous Saint, where the light of Christ was surrounding them.  This can be seen as the halos depicted above a Saint’s head in art.  This light was brought upon them by God’s Holy Spirit, so that God had snatched away (good translation of “katalabē”), “like a thief,” their souls from Satan.

The presence of this light that removes all possibility of darkness from the Christians of Thessaly is said above to be due to them being “children of light and children of the day.” The actual Greek states, “huioi phōtos” [comma] and “huioi hēmeras.” The word “huioi” is repeated, lending it an importance of identification. Those repeated word are rooted in the singular word “huios,” which properly means “sons.”  The Biblical implication of “huios” as “sons” means it can state (as understood use), “Anyone sharing the same nature as their Father.” (Helps Word Studies for “hyiós“) Certainly, “their Father” has to be understood as God, the LORD.

According to the Helps Word Studies explanation of the Biblical meaning, this word is expanded further by this definition: “For the believer, becoming a son of God begins with being reborn (adopted) by the heavenly Father – through Christ (the work of the eternal Son).” Therefore, while it can be assumed the Christians of Thessaly included men and women, husbands and wives, this use of “sons” clearly identifies them all as the “sons of light” and the “sons of day,” as those embodying the Mind of Christ, Jesus the Son.

By Paul stating “we are” (“esmen”), he was writing as one of those “sons of light,” “sons of day,” so he knew the same as the Christians of Thessaly, because they all were filled with the Mind of Christ as the same Son. Still, “we are” is actually led by the capitalized “Ouk,” meaning “Not.”

The importance of that negative says the voice in Paul’s mind spoke loudly, “Not are we of night nor of darkness.” Paul knew all the writers and addressees had escaped death and the dark night of the soul after death.  They had been saved by each being a reborn Jesus, who said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” (John 8:12) “Follows” means be the next Jesus.

The translation of verse 6, “So then let us not fall asleep as others do,” can seem like Paul was giving a pep talk, urging them not to drift off and die, when they have “light” and “day” on their sides. In reality, the Greek text literally states, “So then not we should sleep like the rest.” The “conditional” form of “katheudó” implies that none will reach death and have a soul lost in darkness because they are “sons of light” and “sons of day.” This conditional form reminds us of verse 1, which said this chapter would address “Conditions on top of” (“Peri”) being tasked to spread the Gospel of Christ.  One condition is Apostles should not sleep like the rest.

Paul then stated the additional responsibilities Apostles have, which is stated where he wrote, “but let us keep awake and be sober.” The word translated as “awake” is “grégoreó,” which is the conditional form of the root word “grēgorōmen.” The proper translation states, “but we should be vigilant.” This is then followed by the word translated as “sober,” which has “néphó” as its root, from the conditional form written– “nēphōmen.” The completion of the statement is then “and we should be free of illusions,” where “not being delusional” is a viable substitute for “sober.” Again, Paul spoke in the conditional form, which maintains the theme set in the introduction of “Conditions on top of” preaching the word of God.

The translation that says, “for those who sleep sleep at night, and those who are drunk get drunk at night” is actually shown in the Greek text for verse 7 as having four segments, with a semi-colon splitting this verse in the middle. Those language ‘road signs’ say pause and reflect on each segment before proceeding to the next. The four segments literally translate as, “those indeed sleeping,” “by night sleep,” [semi-colon] “and those becoming drunk,” “by night get drunk.” Each segment has its own separate idea that needs to be grasped, before one can run and toss everything together in one quick breath of reading.

To begin with, “those indeed sleeping” recognizes the need for an Apostle to remain alert and free of illusions because (“gar” = “indeed,” => “cause”) the rest of humanity is “sleeping,” as mortals born of death. Only those who are alert and awake can rouse those asleep from their slumbering lives. The separate segment that says “by night sleep,” is a focus being placed on the absence of light that night brings. That, in turn, maintains how ‘dead’ humans of normal life sleepwalk towards a dark end. Following a longer pause for reflection on those statements (the intent of a semi-colon), the next segment then continues (“and”) by placing focus on this life of darkness assisting a sleepwalker because mortals born of death have “become drunk.”

This state of “intoxication” is not caused by drinking alcoholic beverages (as if drinking was the only sin of darkness, only done after nightfall).  Instead, it projects all the artificial “highs” and addictive “lows” that one gets from the excesses of the material plane. Excessive drinking can be representative of anything the world has to offer that places the user in an altered state of being, incapable of “seeing the light.” This is then supported in the final segment, “which states “by night get drunk.”

Because “drunk” represents the illusions of life (they used to say drunks saw hallucinations of pink elephants), “sober” is the opposite, where one is “free of illusions.” Paul then encouraged the Thessalonians (in the conditional) to remain “sober,” as those who are led by the light “of day.” That ability to remain focused on helping those who are still in darkness, is then stated as if an Apostle should dress like a ‘Christian soldier’, with a breastplate and helmet.

Halloween – Almost normal
All other days of the year – delusional

That ‘armor’ of protection is then a reference back to the Holy Spirit being the truth of “Peace and safety.” Because a “breastplate” covers the heart area, it becomes the armor of one’s “faith and love” of God. The “helmet,” as the crown of one’s “hope of salvation,” is then the “security” an Apostle receives from the Mind of Christ (with a helmet covering one’s Big Brain of ego).  As visual as the verbiage seems, this armor is invisible and comfortably worn by all Saints.

The translation of verse 9 above (NASB), “For God has destined us not for wrath but for obtaining salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ,” is again set without the pauses Paul indicated. There are four segments here, which literally say, “because not has destined us God to wrath,” followed by “but for obtaining salvation,” and then “through the Lord of us.” The final segment states “Jesus Christ,” which is the entity that true Christians become. “Jesus Christ” becomes the author of our “salvation,” when God changes one’s assignment from mortal born of death to a soul allowed everlasting life in light.

When the translation sums this identity of “Jesus Christ” as, “who died for us,” millions of Christians think: Because Jesus died and went to Heaven, anyone who believes that will also go to Heaven.  This is wrong, because that it an over-simplification of that which was written. The literal Greek says of “Jesus Christ” that he is “the [One] having died for us.”

The word translated as “for” is that word “peri” again, so “Jesus Christ having died” was conditional “(condition on top of”). Further, the singular number of the word “the” (implying “One,” as “the [One]”) is then followed by the plural pronoun “us.” The plural number says “Christ Jesus died so there could be many Jesus Christs.” As One (the singular), Jesus was limited to only being that guy from Nazareth, born in Bethlehem. However, by him “having died,” then “Jesus,” as the “Christ” “could be us.”

Verse 10 then continues in the conditional (not shown in the NASB translation) saying, “that [a reference back to the death of Jesus leading to Christ in us] whether we might watch or we might sleep.” This is saying that by having Christ be one with an Apostle (the same in all Apostles), then the human being that becomes the risen Lord has nothing to worry about in life (“we might be alert and watchful”) or our body’s eventual death (“we might fall into the sleep of death”). We do not have to worry because (the next segment says), “together with him we might live.” The conditional statements then speak of being filled with God’s Holy Spirit, bringing about that ‘living together’ arrangement.

Verse 11 then ends this selected reading with the Greek text showing three segments. The first says, “Therefore encourage each other.” This is what Paul’s letter is doing. It is a statement that Apostles and Saints “console, send for, invite, beg, admonish, and comfort” one another (from “parakaleó”). This is as opposed to Christians glad-handing for five minutes during “the Peace,” and then silently slinking off, never to call upon a fellow Christian otherwise (unless there is money to be made).

The next segment says, “and build up one another,” which says to add strength to the ones who may be older, or sicker, or (in those ancient times) put in jail for being Christian. To “build up one another” is like “encouraging one another,” as it means a compliment here and a handshake there, with going out of one’s way to recognize the works of faith in one other than oneself. It means sharing, because you want others to share with you.  This recommends a fulfillment of the command, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

Finally, Paul ended with the assurance, “just as you are doing.” The Greek word “poieite” (“you are doing”) is the present infinitive of “poieó.” That is a verb stating “action.” It means “manufacturing, making, constructing, acting and causing.” It is an encouragement to “keep up the good works.” That says Paul knew their “works” and wanted them to know he knew.

This act of kindness, as a written ‘pat on the back’, is what being Christian is all about. If you cannot compliment another Christian for their good deeds, then perhaps some are actually standing in a tunnel of darkness, looking at the light at its end. Depending on how big and bright that light appears, some might still be afraid to step out into that light. Once one does, one will stand with other Saints and Apostles, turning back to the tunnel, so all can be reaching out to someone else who was also lost and afraid.

Come into the light, brother and sister.

Matthew 25:14-30 – What to do with spiritual wealth made avilable? [Twenty-fourth Sunday after Pentecost]

Jesus said, “It is as if a man, going on a journey, summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them; to one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. The one who had received the five talents went off at once and traded with them, and made five more talents. In the same way, the one who had the two talents made two more talents. But the one who had received the one talent went off and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money. After a long time the master of those slaves came and settled accounts with them. Then the one who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five more talents, saying, ‘Master, you handed over to me five talents; see, I have made five more talents.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.’ And the one with the two talents also came forward, saying, ‘Master, you handed over to me two talents; see, I have made two more talents.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.’ Then the one who had received the one talent also came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew that you were a harsh man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed; so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.’ But his master replied, ‘You wicked and lazy slave! You knew, did you, that I reap where I did not sow, and gather where I did not scatter? Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received what was my own with interest. So take the talent from him, and give it to the one with the ten talents. For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away. As for this worthless slave, throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’”

——————————————————————————————————-

The is the Gospel reading selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for Year A, Proper 28, the twenty-fourth Sunday after Pentecost. It will next be read aloud by a priest in church on Sunday, November 15, 2017. It is important because it addresses being given the talents of the Holy Spirit and one’s use of those in God’s service, as told in the Parable of the Talents (or Minas).

In reference to this reading, it is one that I feel is most important to grasp. I have posted on WordPress about the meaning of the parable of the talents twice before. Once on two previous blogs I had.

They both address my feelings on this allegory told by Jesus; and the posting on Bus Stop Sermons addresses this Gospel reading being joined with the other readings on that Sunday – the prophetess Deborah and Paul’s encouragement for vigilance.  That was in October 2014, when Proper 28 fell during “stewardship month,” so few sermons were preached on any of the readings, although “talents” was a lead-in to pointing out how much savings the congregation was sitting on, not giving all they could to the church.

It must be clearly understood that this reading has absolutely nothing to do with money, just as Jesus was not trying to preach to Jews how to build silos to store grains, nor was he teaching how to store lamp oil for future needs. The use of “talents” must be seen as the immensity of power that one receives when blessed by God’s (the Master’s) gifts of the Holy Spirit.

All that glisters is not gold. (The Merchant of Venice)

The Greek word “talanta” is plural number of the word “talanton,” which actually refers to a weight of silver or gold – roughly 75 pounds.  This weight equates to about 6,000 silver denarii, but increases to 180,000 denarii (30x more) if the weight was in gold.  There is nothing in the words of this parable that differentiates this weight of value as one or the other. Nowhere does the words “gold” or “silver” appear. This means a “talent” is meant to be understood as a general statement of value, which (as the money commercials for silver say) “Will never be worth nothing!” Still, a “talent” should be read generally as a precious commodity, one in which time usually yields increased value to fixed amounts held.

For this writing, I will try not to repeat what I have already posted; but because I strongly want to expound on a greatly ignored and misunderstood (or misrepresented) parable, I will add a few tidbits that I now see exposed.

(Isn’t it wonderful how re-reading Scripture always has something new to offer?)

First of all, we are presented a translation in verse 14 (the first verse of this reading), where we read: “Jesus said, “It is as if a man, going on a journey, summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them.” The Greek text literally states, “Just like for a man going on a journey called their own servants”  ,  “and delivered to them the possessing of him.”

As two segments, the implication of the masculine plural “tous” allows me to see this as a statement of God using man as His servants, so “man going on a journey” becomes not the Master, but the Apostle(s).  The journey will be a commitment of servitude, and that service to the LORD will lead to their being called “slaves.”

By reading the segment that says, “delivered to them the possessing of him,” this makes clear (in Christian ideology terms) the possession of the Holy Spirit. Because these three men have promised to serve the Master, that allowed them the addition (“and”) “of him” within.  The Master never left them as they journeyed; he was in their hearts and minds. That presence means the three became elevated in Spirit by the gifts of “talents.”

Second, when we see the talents have been dispersed unequally (five to one, two to another, and one to the third), we read: “to each according to his ability.” The impact of those words makes one think in terms of “how much the slaves can handle.” This is not the only way the word “dynamin” should be read.

For such a “servant” to have some level of proven “ability” with money, it begs the question: “If the slave was so able to wisely invest money, why is he a slave and not a rich man in the first place, with his own slaves?”  This possibility becomes the most likely, after one sees the “man on a journey” is a volunteer for God, sacrificing self-serving goals for the Father.  Therefore, all three men should be equally able.

I imagine three children of a father being given their allowance.  To the nine- year-old the father hands a five dollar bill. To the seven-year-old he hands a two dollar bill; and to the four-year old he hands a one dollar bill. After the father walks away, I’m sure the conversation between young boys would be something like this:

“Hey!” said the seven-year-old, “How come you get five dollars and I just get two?”

“Its cause you’re just little!” replies the nine-year-old.

Meanwhile, the four-year-old looks at the one dollar bill and says, “I’m going to buy lots of candy with my money.”

None of them could spend any of their money, since the father left.  Without any ability to do anything with pieces of paper, there would no way the boys could spend it (much less invest it).

This is why “according to his ability” means what each had done to get the allowance – through chores and responsibilities that had been previously demonstrated. It has more to do with what one has earned, than being a statement of how able one is to run a farm or a household with land.

In the scenario of three sons, the older boy would have done more work than the younger boys.  They were given an allowance that was proportionate, based on age. Thus, the nine-year-old was able to do more work and it was that experience that made him wiser, thus more capable of earning more. The youngest would have done the least, and therefore would be the least experienced mentally and be less physically adept. His lack of age and maturity would make him incapable of knowing how to volunteer for extra work (for pay) and he would not know how to do any unlearned work (for any bonuses that might come with pay).

This comparison to children and those immature of minds and bodies does not work as a comparison to this parable, once one sees the reaction the Master has when the slave given one talent does not produce a yield. When we hear the Master say to the one given one talent, “You wicked and lazy slave!”, we are told all three were equal mentally and physically.  There were no lowered expectations from this third slave.

That third slave is then addressed based on the mind-body equality of the other two.  By being called “Wicked” (from “Ponēre“) this becomes a statement of personal thought and the brain’s control.  By being called “lazy” (from “oknēre“), that becomes a statement of personal effort.  The capitalization of “Wicked” and the lower-case spelling of “lazy” is a subtle way of saying, “Where the brain leads, the body follows.”

That man admitted he had been “afraid” (“phobētheis”) and his only action was based on fear.  That act was “to hide” (“ekrypsa”) the talent given him. To admit to burying it in the “ground” (“”), he confessed to feeling more secure with worldly values, than the spiritual gift he had been given.

This view of the Master’s, based on the misuse of a talent, says that the three slaves were the equivalents of people saying they served God, with all their heart and all their mind.

The first slave is then the example of one who had studied the Laws, prayed for guidance in understanding, gave a fair share of his wealth to the poor, raised his family to be faithful, and shared his knowledge of faith with others of like mind, who sought answers.

The second slave also studies the Laws and prayed for guidance, but he had no money, so he had no family, and had no influence because of that.

The third slave simply memorized the Laws, well enough to become wealthy from it, but that was his only positive. Otherwise, he prayed loudly in public, so his prayers were answered by those listening on earth (not God); he invested his wealth in the Temple, so he became richer as a business associate; he married for pleasure, to a woman only pretentiously faithful; and he never had children (at least of faith, none who could not see through his façade).

This unspoken way of seeing the Jews of Jesus’ day makes the allegory of the parable have real dimensions that helps to explain the symbolism of the Master giving different amounts of wealth to his slaves. While this view is not to be taken as “the Gospel,” it shows how the works of the slaves merited the dispersal of talents. Since many of the parables and stories told by Jesus were intended to slap the faces of those “wicked and lazy slaves” that were the Pharisees, Sadducees, scribes and Temple priests, this would then be how to see the one slave who did nothing to take a talent and make it grow.

Understanding this parable in that light then makes it possible to direct that light on today’s Christians. There are those who do the works necessary to warrant multiple gifts of the Holy Spirit. There are those who do what they can in limited circumstances, which thereby limits how many gifts they can use, so nothing goes to waste (their ability). Those are the ones whom the Master says, “Well done!” (“Eu“)

Then, there are those who know Scripture, but for all the wrong reasons. They are the ones who are afraid of losing what they can gain in the world, simply by telling people how to find God. They could “witness for Christ,” but there is no money to be made from that sacrifice.  Some might call this group the “wolves in sheep’s clothing.”

When the Master told that last slave, “You ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received what was my own with interest,” this points the finger of guilt towards the ones who claim their success is proof that it had been given to them by God.

The beneficiary is “God.”

While those Christians may contribute to have beautiful churches to call their own, no church has ever saved one soul from damnation (as only people can). This means it would be better to give “one talent” of cash ($19.8k in going silver rates; $2.34 million if gold) to a local cab company, which would then instruct their drivers to wait outside the places of the night, with instructions to drive the guilty of sin (free of charge) to that man’s church.  They the drunken bodies could be dumped on the church steps, so that maybe one in a million would actually go inside and pray to God for help. That one soul would then represent some R.O.I. as interest on the worth some man reaped from professing to believe in God. Instead, the analogy is that the wicked slave just paid bills for his or her church, which kept the lights and A/C on, the water bill paid, and a new roof in place every 20 years, while writing all that off on his income tax.

Finally, I would like to comment on the condemnation, where the Master gave the order, “Throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”  This gives the impression that God has some “bouncer angels” that stand by His side, when He comes to visit the wicked and lazy.  It gives the impression that God punishes people for evil deeds.  That is wrong, simply because it takes the actions of a weak soul and makes God seem like a vengeful deity.

The word translated as “Throw” is “ekbalete,” which is fully shown as “throw out,” or “cast out,” or “banish.” It means “to drive out,” which makes this command not for someone else to administer, as it is done by the Master speaking.  The slave immediately became an “outcast,” based on self actions (or inactions).

With this parable from the Gospel of Matthew being linked with the epistle of Paul, which spoke of sleeping at night and being in darkness, as opposed to true Apostles being “sons of light” and “sons of day,” the same use of metaphor is stated in this expulsion. All three slaves of the Master had the benefit of light and day, from which their talent(s) could grow and expand. However, because the one slave “hid” his talent “in the ground,” he covered that light up.

This is then an enactment of the English proverb, “to hide one’s light under a bushel.” That saying was rooted in Matthew 5:15, which states: “nor does anyone light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on the lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house.” Because the one slave was more in love with the darkness and drunkenness of the earthly realm, he was the one who sealed his own fate by his confession of his deed. He got what he preferred. He sought an external light (the meaning of “exoteron,” or “outer”), rather than one that shines within his or her own heart and mind.  Unfortunately, that external illusion of light is the darkness of mortal death.

When God, as the Master said, “Where there will be weeping and grinding of teeth,” an alternative translation of “weeping” is “lamentation.”

No, say it ain’t so! Make this failed election go away!

As Jeremiah wrote of the cries and tears that came from the Jews who had lost their precious land to invaders, the “weeping” was known by God.  It is the moans and cries of those who realized their mistakes too late. God had ‘been there, done that’ with the Jews and Israelites, who wept and gnashed greatly; so Jesus could safely project that was the way of all losers – speaking for the Father.

The “gnashing (or grinding) of teeth” is what people do when they are angry, in one or two ways.  Either anger causes teeth to grind because one faces a complete loss of control, when one wants to do something other than what one is being forced to do; or the gnashing of teeth comes when one has no one to blame but oneself. <Cue picture of Homer Simpson saying “Doh!”>

Both scenarios equally applied in this man’s case.  Therefore, the Master simply pointed out what people bring upon themselves, where the 20/20 of hindsight means lots of tears and eroded enamel are typical.  It is that fuzzy line between prophecy and high probability.

The moral of the story is to put oneself into this man’s position, where God presents one with a talent to use wisely. Then, rather than taking the money and running (or digging a hole in the ground and burying it), one needs to prove to God you will not waste away a good thing. A talent is a heavy responsibility (75 pounds); but you have to bear that load well and say, “Thank you Sir. May I have another?”

#Matthew251430 #Matthew515 #parableofthetalents

Ezekiel 34:11-16, 20-24 – Gathering lost sheep [Christ the King Sunday]

Thus says the Lord God: I myself will search for my sheep, and will seek them out. As shepherds seek out their flocks when they are among their scattered sheep, so I will seek out my sheep. I will rescue them from all the places to which they have been scattered on a day of clouds and thick darkness. I will bring them out from the peoples and gather them from the countries, and will bring them into their own land; and I will feed them on the mountains of Israel, by the watercourses, and in all the inhabited parts of the land. I will feed them with good pasture, and the mountain heights of Israel shall be their pasture; there they shall lie down in good grazing land, and they shall feed on rich pasture on the mountains of Israel. I myself will be the shepherd of my sheep, and I will make them lie down, says the Lord God. I will seek the lost, and I will bring back the strayed, and I will bind up the injured, and I will strengthen the weak, but the fat and the strong I will destroy. I will feed them with justice.

Omitted: [17 “As for you, My flock, thus says the Lord God, ‘Behold, I will judge between one sheep and another, between the rams and the male goats. 18 Is it too slight a thing for you that you should feed in the good pasture, that you must tread down with your feet the rest of your pastures? Or that you should drink of the clear waters, that you must foul the rest with your feet? 19 As for My flock, they must eat what you tread down with your feet and drink what you foul with your feet!’” ]

Therefore, thus says the Lord God to them: I myself will judge between the fat sheep and the lean sheep. Because you pushed with flank and shoulder, and butted at all the weak animals with your horns until you scattered them far and wide, I will save my flock, and they shall no longer be ravaged; and I will judge between sheep and sheep.

I will set up over them one shepherd, my servant David, and he shall feed them: he shall feed them and be their shepherd. And I, the Lord, will be their God, and my servant David shall be prince among them; I, the Lord, have spoken.

———————————————————————————————————

This is the Old Testament selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for Year A, Proper 29, the last Sunday of Pentecost. It will next be read aloud in church on Sunday, November 26, 2017. As the last Sunday of Pentecost, it is recognized as Christ the King Sunday. Verses 17 through 19 are omitted from the service reading, but I have been included in the presentation above because they add depth to understanding fat sheep. This is important as it prophesies the coming of Jesus the Messiah, after God will gather the scattered sheep (Israelites and Jews) from their lost places (Babylon and beyond), for him to Shepherd.

This reading’s lead-in (verses 1-10, which are not read aloud) has the title “Prophecy against the Shepherds of Israel,” as the title that appears on the Bible Gateway website, specifically for the New American Standard Bible translation. For the verses shown above, the title changes to “The Restoration of Israel.” The omitted verses lean more towards the main title, rather than about God restoring the chaos caused by bad shepherds. Still, in the beginning and at the start of these verses, Ezekiel is continuing what he stated in verse 1: “The word of the Lord came to me,” which is a clear statement of God speaking through a Prophet.

After reading these verses of God searching for his lost sheep, I recalled an episode of the reality TV show “Alaska: The Last Frontier.” Two of the ranchers had to go to find cattle that had become lost after freezing weather had come in, and a larger storm was to follow that one. The cattle were in danger being on frozen tundra, unable to forge swollen and freezing rivers.

Here is a video clip.

This video is just a portion of what the episode covers; but where someone says the cows get scared and hide under a cedar tree, it becomes clear that the cattle kind of like their new stomping grounds. They would rather hide in fear, than come out and say, “Here we are.  So glad you found us!”

The scattered cattle have to be rounded up and headed back to their respective ranches, or they would happily stay where they were … lost … until a predator killed them for dinner or winter kept them from finding any food. Either way, the out of place cattle would end up dead. The point of my bringing up these cattle is they can then become a parallel for the sheep in this reading, as cattle and sheep are both dumb animals that have a hard time knowing what’s good for them … and what’s evil.  So they need a herder.

Imagining that the scattered sheep in the scenario spoken of by Ezekiel, for God, are like those lost cattle on a cable show, it becomes easier to see how the scattered sheep probably were not baa-ing for saving. After “the days of clouds and thick darkness,” they probably did the best they could and grazed wherever they could.  For a lost grazer, anywhere can be called home.

Sometimes it is hard to tell the sheep from the sheep. They blend in so well.

So, when God spoke and said, “I will bring them out from the peoples and gather them from the countries,” the lost sheep were probably allowing foreign “people” to be their shepherds, and they had gotten used to the vegetation of foreign “countries.” They acquired a taste for strange people and places.  However, God had a plan for them: find them; bring them back to the fold; and have them be led by His “servant David,” which means Jesus (of the Bethlehem heritage).

Reading this prophecy of Ezekiel made me think of the Parable of the Prodigal Son, which is not the Gospel reading that will accompany this Old Testament reading. (I know because I checked.) The Gospel of Proper 29 is Matthew 25:31-46 and it is a perfect fit for a reading with the title that says it is “against shepherds.” It ties into the Christ the King theme, but has Christ separating the sheep to his right and the goats to his left.  While Ezekiel 34 feeds that theme, Luke 15:11-32 (the parable of the prodigal son) deals with the aspect of foreign people and foreign countries.

That parable deals with the prodigal son becoming lost, with the end of the story being the celebration of the lost being found – “But we had to celebrate and rejoice, for this brother of yours was dead and has begun to live, and was lost and has been found.” (Luke 15:32) As this reading from Ezekiel is about finding lost sheep, it projects God as if He were planning on going out and selectively choosing which sheep to be found. In an anthropomorphic story, it appears that God lost a little of his All-Knowing Mind and All-Seeing Eye.

In the parable of the prodigal son, the father allows his son to become lost and does nothing to go find him. The father does not send spies to keep up on his son’s whereabouts.  It is through that lens of seeing the Father allowing the lost to be lost that this Ezekiel reading becomes more powerful.  The assumption that God would hunt for lost sheep should be inverted, such that God will make it possible for the sheep to find Him.

In the translation above, including the omitted verses and all coming from the New American Standard Bible version, the word repeated the most times (in variations of usage) is “feed.” It appears six times in the NASB translation, while the actual Hebrew text shows seven times (in verses 11-24).  The translation above, “they must eat,” is the missing time. This repetition is significant, especially when “fat” (2x) and “lean” (1x) are allusions to how much the lost sheep have been fed. This focus on food (which implies grass, upon which sheep graze) becomes an overall statement about how God will search for His lost sheep.

Rather than God Himself taking physical form and hunting for lost livestock (“I myself will search for my sheep, and will seek them out”), the lost will be found by the Word of God.  That is the food that will remain present among the sheep, no matter where they roam. God first sent manna as the food for the Spirit of the Israelites.  They forever remembered being found by God in the breaking of bread at Passover.  When Jesus said, “eat this [bread] in remembrance of me,” the meaning is the food that leads one back to God.

Ezekiel was one of those who would serve God and seek the lost sheep, to return them to the foal. Still, the feed of Israel is the Holy Scriptures, orally recited from memory, as well as written onto scrolls and kept safely secured. That history of promise and all the Laws of the Covenant, with all the songs of praise and prophecies of doom (the “clouds and thick darkness”), that IS the “rich pasture on the mountains of Israel” from which the lost sheep can always feed.

Because God said through Ezekiel that “I myself will judge between the fat sheep and the lean sheep” and “I will judge between sheep and sheep,” one can assume that all of the lost sheep reclaimed will have been fed by God. Some will be fed more than others, with some fed on pure pasture and clean water, while others are left ‘the crumbs off that tableland’. The omitted verses (17-19) state how some of the sheep will walk all over the grass the others graze from and then drink from clean waters, before muddying the streams by walking through that water. This states the quality of the feed (the graze) the lost sheep will have available to them, with the rams taking the best and leaving the other sheep the rest.

In the parable of the prodigal son, it was food that brought him back home. Sure, he had taken his inheritance and squandered it in a foreign country; but he was willing to hire himself out to one individual of that country (probably another lost sheep), rather than consider going home and be seen as a loser. In the midst of a famine that befell that land, the prodigal son fed the scraps from his foreign master’s table to the swine, while he was starved. It was then the memory of the plentiful food that was given to the lowest of his father’s hired hands and the livestock that motivated the lost son to go home.

In the Ezekiel reading, we hear God saying: “I will seek the lost, and I will bring back the strayed, and I will bind up the injured, and I will strengthen the weak, but the fat and the strong I will destroy. I will feed them with justice.” In the parable of the prodigal son, we find of the son’s decision to admit his sins and beg to taken back as a hired hand, led to the father seeing his return.  The son had found his way back home, to the father’s delight.

We read, “while he was still a long way off, his father saw him and felt compassion for him, and ran and embraced him and kissed him.” (Luke 15:20) This says that repentance will be the that which will find, bring back, mend, and strengthen the lost. Those who repent will be those who were lost but then were found. Their repentance will have come from the feed of Scripture, which promises justice.

It is important to see this connection between being fed the Word of God. This Word is ignored by those of foreign countries, who worship other gods and have no concept of resurrection and a lost soul’s return to be with God the Father. Thus, it is the sheep metaphor that represents those of Judaic-Christian heritage and tradition. The sheep are those who graze upon the Word of God. However, there are those among the sheep that dilute the words of God, for the purpose of getting themselves fat, while the other sheep get lean.

The fat sheep are then the bad  (or false) shepherds, who were those who lost the Promised Land and then came back to Jerusalem as the Pharisees, Sadducees, scribes and Temple priests. They offered sacrificed to God as the high and mighty (the fat and the strong), while keeping for themselves the best parts (the good pastures) and leaving the others the guilt (tread upon pastures). They amended the laws (the clear waters) to suit their needs, while forcing (pushed with flank and shoulder, and butted) the rest to comply.

When God said, “I will save my flock, and they shall no longer be ravaged; and I will judge between sheep and sheep;” adding, “I will set up over them one shepherd, my servant David, and he shall feed them: he shall feed them and be their shepherd,” this means more than God sending Jesus (a descendant of the House of David, through Jesse) to Jerusalem. Jesus was one in a line of Holy Prophets who kept the food of Scripture pure, and the spirit of the Word clean.  However, Jesus Christ sired a line of Apostles in his name.

This means the judgment between “sheep and sheep” is determined by whose soul appears at the doorsteps of Heaven. Are they the souls of sheep who were shepherded there by the Mind of Christ? Or, are they the souls of those shepherded by the brains of men, who did nothing to lead another sheep’s soul home to God?  Were they sheep who had fun being with foreign people and the ways of foreign countries?  Or, were they afraid of their absence from the LORD, hiding under trees, before they were found by an Apostle and herded to holy use?

In the parable of the prodigal son, the son proclaimed, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and in your sight; I am no longer worthy to be called your son.” To have “sinned against heaven” means a confession for having allowed the flesh between the earholes (the Big Brain) to guide him selfishly. He had wanted his inheritance in advance, which he then squandered.  He understood that he had done nothing to deserve a return home to Heaven, to be again with the father as his son.

The prodigal son had intended on asking his father if he would take him as a hired hand; but because the father went to meet the son, before he could make that request, the father embraced the son with love. That symbolism is God entering into the heart of the wayward son in a union that was the desire of the wayward son. Once that presence was in the heart, the father ordered his slaves, “Quickly bring out the best robe and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand and sandals on his feet.” (Luke 15:22)

That “best robe” was the wedding gown of marriage. We have read of it in other parables.  The ensuing celebration and feast was the marriage banquet of the sheep to the Father, as an Apostle, as a Saint. It was that holy union that made the return to Heaven possible, as the judgment of the Father was to recognize a sheep that had been led back home by its having the Good Shepherd within.

This is how one should read the last verse, where it says “I will judge between sheep and sheep.” As those who profess to be Christians, we are all sheep on this earth. In order to gain entrance into the Spiritual realm of the Father, we have to determine what kind of sheep we are: Are we the sheep who serve God, through the Holy Spirit and the Mind of Christ, being led by the Good Shepherd? Or, are we the sheep who serve self, who trample underfoot the Word and weaken the spirit of faith in others, being led by Satan?

It is possible to read all Scripture in a vacuum and reach a full understanding of what this reading from Ezekiel means. When we link its meaning to other Scripture, that understanding compounds greatly.

It is the presence of God in one’s heart that seeks understanding – one wants not to be lost. It is the Christ Mind that whispers to seek the same message of one passage to be mirrored in many others. The truth of meaning is how one ceases doubting and finds faith. It takes repentance to seek to be found and worthy of becoming a hired hand for God.

This will become clearer when one reads the accompanying Gospel: Matthew 25:31-46.  That one has the title “Judgement.”

Ephesians 1:15-23 – Praying the spirit of wisdom will come [Christ the King Sunday]

I have heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus and your love toward all the saints, and for this reason I do not cease to give thanks for you as I remember you in my prayers. I pray that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation as you come to know him, so that, with the eyes of your heart enlightened, you may know what is the hope to which he has called you, what are the riches of his glorious inheritance among the saints, and what is the immeasurable greatness of his power for us who believe, according to the working of his great power. God put this power to work in Christ when he raised him from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the age to come. And he has put all things under his feet and has made him the head over all things for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all.

——————————————————————————————————–

This is the Epistle selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for Year A, Proper 29, the last Sunday of Pentecost, Christ the King Sunday. It will next be read aloud in church on Sunday, November 26, 2017. This is important because Paul addressed the power of Christ in the world, whose power is spread through Apostles like Paul  and those to whom he wrote in Ephesus.

I apologize for turning selections from Paul’s letters into dissertations of what was written and what the Greek says the meaning is, simply because Paul wrote in a manner that was directed by the Holy Spirit, which intended for his words to be most difficult to grasp. I have explained that I have been led to understand the writings of Nostradamus (relative to his work Les Propheties), which involves close attention to punctuation marks and other ‘guideposts’ of language. However, in the above translation, a long-winded Paul wrote nine verses, with four period marks – seemingly somewhat understandable, if the reader in church takes a breath at those four places of ‘full-stop’ rest.

I have posted the literal translation below, with each break point as indicated by the Greek text found here; and you will find that 180 words of English translation are written (some Greek words indicated multiple English words), all with only one period mark … the one at the end. There is one semi-colon (for emergency air intake), which appears after 144 words have been stated. However, if this selection of Paul is read line by line, in the way I have shown it, it makes 34 statements, such that the commas act as period marks, with the period mark showing where this selection altogether ends.

Because the translation above (New American Standard Bible version) is taking the standard liberties of normal syntax adjustments between Greek and English, they see the long run-on and attempt to make one tremendously long address be more like a very educated fellow, who would need to puff on his pipe four times, just to keep it lit. When this translation reaches a volunteer reader, who may be scared to death in front of an audience, or even a seasoned reader of Scripture, the speed of the reading means the listeners have only seconds to grasp words that hold deep thoughts – from God. Needless to say, Paul flies quickly over the heads of most readers and listeners, so Paul is known to cause heads to ache thinking about what he meant.

To read Paul in the manner that I have made possible below, the purpose is to slow down and listen to what your heart and mind tell you. In the small and manageable segment bits, one is able to see how this becomes Paul speaking conversationally, in the language of God. One has to be involved in the parts prior to this selection, as one set of words is connected to the next. Still, it makes one think and research. This difficulty is so only those who love God can understand – as were the Ephesians, who (like Paul) were given an ability to “speak in foreign tongues.”

The literal translation below should be read and its intent and meaning grasped, one line segment at a time. Nothing is superfluous or unnecessary.

15. Because of this ,
I also ,
having heard of the among you faith in the Lord Jesus ,
and the love the toward all the saints ,
16. not do cease giving thanks for you ,
mention making in the prayers of me ,
17. that the God of the Lord of us ,
Jesus Christ ,
the Father the of glory ,
might give to you spirit of wisdom and revelation ,
in knowledge of him ,
18. being enlightened the eyes of the heart of you ,
in order the to know you ,
what is the hope of the calling of him ,
in the saints ,
19. and what the surpassing greatness of the power of him ,
toward us ,
those believing according to the working of the might of the strength of him ,
20. which he worked in the Christ ,
having raised him out from dead ,
and having set at right hand of him ,
in the heavenly realms ,
21. above every principality ,
and authority ,
and power ,
and dominion ,
and every name being named ,
not only in the age this ,
but also in the coming ;
22. and all things he put under the feet of him ,
and him gave head over all things to the church ,
23. which is the body of him ,
the fullness of the the all things ,
in all filing .

Now, in this literal translation there are multiple points where an awkward “the” shows. Frequently, the Greek-English text will show no translation for these words, although each one is a version of “the” (such as indicating masculine singular or masculine plural, or other versions of “the”). Sometimes, words will be added or added with brackets, often showing “the [One].” This is an indication that an awkward “the” should be read as “the One,” meaning God.

With this presentation done, I will leave the bulk for the reader to ponder. However, I will address a few elements that spoke to me.

First of all is Paul’s use of the word “pistis,” which is properly translated above as “faith.” The context of that use is Paul’s opening statement (for this selection), “I have heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus.” The literal statement is, “having heard of the among you faith in the Lord Jesus,” where the awkward “the” is “tēn,” which is the singular feminine accusative form of “ho.” Because “pistis” is a feminine noun, a feminine article is attached, meaning this can state, “having heard of among you the faith in the Lord Jesus.”

I point this out because the concept many Christians have of “faith” is it means “belief.” As such, “faith in the Lord Jesus,” when said all at once, real fast, in one breath, means to most people: I have heard the story of Jesus’ death, resurrection, and ascension AND I believe that story, as Jesus being the Lord that sits at God’s right hand.” However, the word “faith,” as “pistis,” means more than that.

The word “pistis” brings a translation of “faith, belief, trust, confidence; fidelity, faithfulness,” while being rooted in “peithô,” which means “persuade” or “be persuaded.” According to HELPS Word Studies, Strong’s word number 4102 (“pistis”) infers a meaning that “is always a gift from God, and never something that can be produced by people. In short, 4102/pistis (“faith”) for the believer is “God’s divine persuasion” – and therefore distinct from human belief (confidence), yet involving it. The Lord continuously births faith in the yielded believer so they can know what He prefers, i.e. the persuasion of His will.”

One should read “yielded believer” as one who has sacrificed self will, in order to serve the LORD. The word means one listens to, obeys, yields to and complies with God’s will, more than being talked into belief by the Lord. Therefore, “faith” is “belief” based on personal experience and not simply word of mouth instructions that sound good.

Second, I would like to address Paul’s use of “hagious” and “hagiois,” both of which are properly translated as “saints.” This represents a repeated usage, which makes Paul’s usage be worthy of further inspection.

In the NASB translation above, we find it within the context of “your love toward all the saints” and “inheritance among the saints.” The literal translations I presented show this as “the love the toward all the saints” and “in the saints,” following the segment that states, “what is the hope of the calling of him.”

In the literal translation, one finds another of the awkward “the” uses, where “the love the toward all the saints” shows the word “tēn” again. The word “agapé” (“love”) is a feminine noun, requiring a feminine “the,” but the intent is to denote “the one of love,” which is relative to “Lord Jesus,” stated in the prior segment. When Paul recognized this “love,” he stated it was sent spiritually to “all” who were saints. Thus, Paul (as a saint) was making an assurance that the Ephesians too were saints.

The preposition “eis” is translated as “toward,” but has definitions that can equally be stated as “into, in, unto, to, upon, towards, for, among.” This means the direction of “the love of the Lord Jesus” is not projected outward, but “into, in, unto and among.” Therefore, it is that inner love of the “Lord” that brings “the love into” a “saint,” who becomes reborn as “Jesus.”

This view makes it important to fully grasp what a “saint” means. While looking up that word in English shows synonyms such as “a person who is deemed holy by a Christian church” or “consecrated,” that is itself a failure to grasp the full meaning.

According to HELPS Word Studies, the Greek root word (“hágios”) is properly read as meaning “different (unlike), other (“otherness”), holy; for the believer, 40 (hágios) means “likeness of nature with the Lord” because “different from the world.’” That site continues to state, “The fundamental (core) meaning of 40 (hágios) is “different” – thus a temple in the 1st century was hagios (“holy”) because different from other buildings (Wm. Barclay). In the NT, 40 /hágios (“holy”) has the “technical” meaning “different from the world” because “like the Lord.’”

Following an assumption that Paul fully understood this meaning as “different,” such that Apostles were those “set apart” from normal human beings (be they Jewish or Gentile), Paul was stating the marriage (“the love”) of God with one of deep “faith” means that God is “calling him” (or “calling Jesus”) to be “in the saints.” Therefore, a “saint” has nothing to do with some external reward or bestowing of a title from any institution of men (and/or women), as (just like “faith”) a saint is “never something that can be produced by people.” Only God determines who the saints will be.

This brings about a third element of Paul’s letter that needs clarification. In the NASB translation above, one finds the statement, “may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation as you come to know him.” (Ephesians 1:17) This makes it appear as if Paul is making a wish (in the form of a prayer) that continued study (“come to know”) “may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation.” This can sound to some as if Paul was wishing the Ephesians would use the Holy Scrolls in the same way that witches use magic spell books to educate themselves, so they can call upon the spirits and produce “miracles.”

As ludicrous as this may seem, the ruling class of Jerusalem saw Jesus in this exact light; and atheists of science see all miracles as trickery, never as divine presence.

In the literal translations I have presented, this single statement of “coming to know” “God the Father” and “Jesus Christ” (so “faith” and “love of the saints” can manifest) is actually split into two segments: “might give to you spirit of wisdom and revelation,” and “in knowledge of him.” The conditional form of “may give” is harder to see, than is “might give,” where “might” becomes a clearer statement of meeting the conditions that warrant the “giving” of a “gift.”

Those conditions are then to be seen as set by “God the Father,” where one “might” get the “gifts” “of wisdom and revelation,” if one has received within “Jesus Christ.” That then allows the “Christ” Mind to be the source of “wisdom and revelation,” so that all this comes “within,” as the “knowledge of him.” It says one can ONLY “come to know Jesus Christ” by BEING the resurrection of the Son of God in earthly form.

The fourth item I will address is the use of the word “elpis,” which has correctly been translated as “hope.” The NASB translation shows this word appearing in the statement, “you may know what is the hope to which he has called you.” (Ephesians 1:18b) The literal translation that I have provided shows this in the segment stating, “what is the hope of the calling of him.”

An English translation of the word “hope” finds verb usage as: “To wish for a particular event that one considers possible;” and “To desire and consider possible.” As a noun it means, “The longing or desire for something accompanied by the belief in the possibility of its occurrence.” When its meaning is applied to Christian ideology, the definition becomes, “The theological virtue defined as the desire and search for a future good, difficult but not impossible to attain with God’s help.” These definitions have become so ingrained into the intellect of humans that speak English fluently that one reads “hope” in a Scriptural context and immediately thinks, “That is some big wish made by Paul for the Ephesians to live up to.”

That is not what Paul meant when he wrote the word “elpis.” The word is rooted in the Greek word “elpō,” which means, “to anticipate, welcome” – properly, expectation of what is sure (certain); hope.” As such, “elpis” means “expectation, trust, and confidence,” which means that “hope” becomes the conditions by which God calls His Son to use a believer as one of His saints.

Hope is the expectation of devoted service. It is the trust that God has in His Son. It is the confidence that the presence of the Holy Spirit brings to an Apostle. Therefore, the only “hope, desire, longing and wishing” is not IN the saint, but in those who are called to Jesus by one confidently presenting hope in a world of despair.

Finally, I would like to comment about the verse that states, “and above every name that is named” (NASB), which I show literally to say, “and every name being named.” (Ephesians 1:21e). This segment follows a trinity of traits held by Christ, as King (the theme of Christ the King Sunday): authority, power, and dominion. All fall with his realm of “principality,” where Jesus Christ rules as the Prince of Peace. Because this series of kingly attributes leads to Paul writing of the church (“ekklésia”), it is easy to bounce right over this speed bump that says, “every name being named.”

Since God rules in Heaven, Jesus Christ can only be King of the Earth. Because Jesus told Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place” (John 18:36) the Earth is the matter of which human beings are made – flesh, sinew, bones and blood, all metaphorically deemed as “clay”.

This means the verses that say, “and him gave head over all things to the church, which is the body of him” (Ephesians 1:22b and Ephesians 1:23a) are directly referring to the physical body of a saint as the church of him, where that body’s brain, in the head, becomes the throne upon which the Mind of Christ rules. Christ is King of the kingdom of saints, where each individual is a church and a collection of saints represents the Church.

When this view is grasped, then one can read “and every name being named” as “pantos onomatos” is stating “each character” or “all reputation” that is “authority, and power, and dominion” of “Christ, raised from dead” (as one born mortal to one eternal in Spirit), that only goes by one name – Jesus Christ. Therefore, the realm of Christ is that which is “onomazomenou,” or “being named” in “each character” identified as saints.

As I see that I have now surpassed the 2,800 word mark (given that about 360 are from stating the Epistle twice), I will conclude with these observations. These observations (I feel) are most important for Christians to understand. Of course, I could go word-by-word in this selection of Paul’s letter to the Christians of Ephesus, and exceed 4,000 words AND still leave many interpretations incomplete. So, I will leave the rest for the reader, as holy homework.

Good studies!

Helpful Hints:

The LOVE of God is Jesus.

One can only LOVE God with all one’s heart, soul, strength and mind by being JESUS reborn in flesh.

The soul of Jesus joined with your soul makes Jesus your NEIGHBOR, who you LOVE as Yahweh.

A CHRIST is a soul Baptized by the Spirit of God (Yahweh), as Christos and mashiach both mean Anointed, where the capitalization (in Greek) means Spiritual Baptism by Yahweh.

When you think “in the name of Jesus Christ,” you must be:

1.) Married to Yahweh, via becoming cleansed of all past sins through Spiritual Baptism [made a Christ];

2.) You become a wife soul of Yahweh (physical flesh makes a soul feminine) , so you take His Name upon you in the sacrifice of your soul to Him in divine union; and,

3.) That Name is then “Jesus” [meaning “YAH Saves”], who (as two souls joined in one body of flesh – Ephraim) becomes one’s soul-flesh LORD, such that his commands over his “kingdom” [your soul-flesh] keep you always a Christ [Spiritually Baptized and without sins].

The meaning of “Christian” only is truth if one is a Christ, reborn as Jesus as one’s Lord, as a physical resurrection of the Son of God again in ministry on the earth, without sin – a SAINT.

Matthew 25:31-46 – Who is a sheep and who is a goat? [Christ the King Sunday]

Jesus said, “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, and he will put the sheep at his right hand and the goats at the left. Then the king will say to those at his right hand, ‘Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink? And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing? And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?’ And the king will answer them, ‘Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.’ Then he will say to those at his left hand, ‘You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.’ Then they also will answer, ‘Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?’ Then he will answer them, ‘Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’ And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”

———————————————————————————————————-

The is the Gospel selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for Year A, Proper 29, the last Sunday after Pentecost, Christ the King Sunday. It will next be read aloud by a priest in church on Sunday, November 29, 2017. This is very important as it was Jesus telling of his return and the judgment that entails.

It is most important to see these words of Jesus, recalled by Saint Matthew, as being said during his time of inspection in Jerusalem, just prior to his last Passover Festival. The title that has been attached to these words (associated with some who lend titles) is “The Judgment” (some “The Final Judgment,” but others “The Sheep and the Goats”). This is when “the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory.”

This tells about the kingdom of Christ Jesus. Jesus is Christ the King! However, this story, like all the parables immediately prior (over four days), are metaphor and allegorical.

While it is easy to see the anthropomorphic aspect of good humans being referred to as “sheep,” and bad humans being “goats,” all of which talk like humans, people claiming to believe this, as Christians, take these words are though Jesus was telling of some distant time, like at the end of the world. This is because the imagery produced by Saint John the Beloved at Patmos, in The Revelation, painted a similar picture of “the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him.” (see Revelation 1:7)  Some take those words as statements of what will happen in the future, while understanding everything else as figurative speech.

The concept of Christ the King goes back to the time in Israel when Samuel ruled as prophet (a most important Judge). When Samuel was old and his sons had proven not to be as holy as their father, the leaders of the people went to Samuel and asked him to tell God they wanted a king, “to be like other nations.” The reality prior to that request was that God was their King … always was, always would be. But, God gave them human kings that progressively got worse, until the idea that having one person rule all the rest, with an assortment of holy advisers (hopefully at least one who could talk to God directly), meant everything had been squandered. After centuries of failing to live up to their Commitment with God (their marriage), the union between the children of Israel (Earth) and God (Heaven) was over (divorced).

This means there is no land of Earth on which the Spirit of Jesus Christ can float down from Heaven and have a throne waiting for him to sit on. Regardless of ALL the propaganda: of Zionism and the restoration of Israel – the nation (on stolen soil) – where Jews can call their rightful home; of Christianity and all the prophecies to be fulfilled so they can see the Dome of the Rock razed, so a Third Temple can signal the End Times (and probably cause many to pee themselves from excitement); and the Rapture of the faithful to Heaven (will they lose their clothes in that process?) … it ain’t gonna happen that way.

That concept of Jesus returning like so many have fantasized is not what Jesus spoke of in this reading.  Nothing in Scripture intends that futuristic view to be the hope of salvation.

The earth that is the Kingdom of Jesus Christ is a human body or a devoted believer, such as Peter and the ten other Apostles, Paul, and every true Christian who has ever been filled with the Holy Spirit of God and the Mind of Christ. That means Jesus Christ came down from the heavenly realm at nineish, the day after he Ascended, when on Pentecost (the “Fiftieth day”) “like a violent rushing wind” eleven guys in an upstairs room in Jerusalem all became Jesus: as Christ Peter, Christ Thomas, Christ John (of Zebedee), so on and so on.

What is all this waiting till the end of the world stuff then? Could it be doubt? Could it be ignorance?

Verse 31 is translated above to state, “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory.” Here is what it really says:  “When next comes the Son … the [One] to mankind in the unspoken manifestation of God the same , AND every kind of the [One] messengers of God with him , then he will set upon dominion inherent of him.” (text here)

This means “the Son of man” is not some title like “the Son of God.” The words “the Son” (“ho Huios“) imply “the Son of God.” The addition of “of man” (“anthrōpou“) means God sent His Son for the benefit “of man,” such that “the Son” was in a fleshy body that is required “of mankind.” However, “When next comes the Son of man,” is when the Son of God is reborn “of man,” in “the unspoken manifestation of God” (aka “glory”), which makes all those reborn “the same” as was the “man” named Jesus.

This means “all” or “every kind of” or “the whole” of those “of man” who are reborn as Jesus (“the [One]”), they then become instantly “messengers of God” (aka “angels”).  This is because they are “with him.”

When one is “with him,” then one is not standing out in a field looking up in the sky, waiting to be “with him” on some distant day in an unknown future. One is either with Jesus, as Jesus reborn, or not.

This becomes the separated anthropomorphic creatures “of man,” which are “sheep” and “goats.”

Christ is the King of a true Christian, who individually is no longer a man or woman (aka “goat”) but a Saint (aka “sheep”). You could say Jesus is Christ the Herder of Sheep and Goats, in a Kingdom of Followers who tend to get lost … often … but that loses the appeal to Israelites, who love a king, to be like other nations. However, the only ‘country’ that Christ is King of is each one of man who subjects him or herself to that ruler (there is no tricameral system of checks and balances in those places, as Christ the King is a monarch).

Now, when the selection says, “All the nations will be gathered before him,” this is a statement similar to the First Commandment, which says, “Thou shall wear the face of no other gods (including your self face) before my face.” That means the only face that one who is married to God can ever wear is God’s face … like Moses wore. Obviously, a true Christian also becomes like Moses, as Jesus reborn.  Since Elijah was part of the Transfiguration, then Elijah also was a model for true Christians.

So, now Jesus is saying, “and will be gathered before the face of him all the races” … “of man.” Once “gathered before him,” Jesus Christ can see clearly who is wearing the face of God (“sheep”) and who is not (“goats”).  Seeing that face then becomes how Jesus separates Christians – true to his right hand, false to his left hand.

If one wants “nations” (rather than “races”) as the translation, then one is allowed to see how the spread of true Christianity (spread by true Christians, like Paul, Peter, James, et al) was not all nations at once. Over time, this influence spread around the Roman possessions that were Judea and Galilee – east, west, north and south.  This spread, over time, caused the Western nations to adopt Christianity as their national religion, either Roman Catholicism or Orthodox Christianity.

In this view, the Christians of all the nations of the entire world will be gathered, from all continents.  Certainly, some countries have significantly fewer Christians than do others.  Its spread to Muslim nations and Hindu nations and tribal nations around the world has been met with varying degrees of resistance; but all the pagans (Gentiles) of the world will not be the ones judged by Christ the King. Only those who claim to serve the King will be separated, one from the other.

Think of this as the bringing in of the sheaves and the analogy of the threshing floor, where only the good grain is gathered, while all the weeds and fruitless plants are thrown into the fire and burned.  After the burning of the rubbish, then the second step in this process becomes where the good grain is separated from the chaff.

The translation that says, “he will separate people one from another,” the word translated as “people” actually says “them,” but since “nations” or “races” can also state “people,” then “them” reflects back to those of whom “nations” and “races” consist. Because these “people” are those who call Jesus Christ “King,” only Christian “people” are found “before” him, or those “people” wearing the face of his “sheep” or his “goats” are allowed to come “before the face of him.”

Again, this is not an end of time event. It is an ongoing judgment that began when Jesus Christ returned in his disciples, who became Apostles. [Hint: Apostles are the sheep.]

It is important to note how the Nicene Creed states belief that Jesus Christ “is seated at the right hand of the Father.” Not only does that denote that Jesus of Nazareth (born in Bethlehem) was a “sheep,” but as “the Son” sent to be “of man,” he was also the Lamb of God … eventually the sacrificial Lamb, found without blemish. At the right hand of God, Christ Jesus became the Good Shepherd “of man,” who are the “sheep.” As a “sheep” the assumption is when one has become found.  A “goat” is still doing its own thing.

Thus, the “people” are all lost, serving other kings in all the nations; but Christians are those lost “sheep” who have found the benefit of Christ Jesus, their Shepherd and their King. Still, while these beliefs and the position of seeing Jesus Christ as God’s “right hand man,” a vision clearly stated in Scripture, we do not clearly see who sits at God’s left hand.

The easy answer is Satan sits at the left hand of God; but one has to understand that Satan’s “throne” is not in Heaven, on the other side of God’s supreme seat, opposite to the one Jesus Christ sits on. Satan’s throne is within the depths of the Earth, which means an earthly realm as opposed to a heavenly one.  As the unstated King of Earthlings (Prince of Darkness), all humanity naturally falls under that reign; but God denies Satan any ability to force mankind to do his bidding.

This means the throne of glory (“the unspoken manifestation of God”) upon which Christ sits is a Spiritual throne within the bodies (matter, earth) “of man.” Christ Jesus can only be seated within that earthly realm if a revolution of the “people” (a Spiritual rebirth) has made that possible.  Those who claim to have dethroned Satan, so Christ Jesus can rule their lives on Earth, they are the ones “who were lost but now are found.”

Originally, there was God (Heaven), who then Created gods (Spiritual angels – elohim) and the earth (matter, the physical universe). In the Creation story, animal man and animal woman were formed on the sixth day; and they were given dominion over all the creatures and plants of Earth. At that time, all was good.

This was because animal man and animal woman only did natural acts, as instinctual of animals. When God told the gods to protect animal man and animal woman, there was a division of the elohim, as some gods submitted to compliance and and some (a third) offered resistance to God’s order. That was the Creation of the left hand, and thus the right hand of God.

The influence of both Good angels and Bad angels caused animal man and animal woman to cower in fear from all those unknown Spiritual entities. As animals, mankind had no knowledge in its little brains.  That led God to create (on the Holy Day) Adam (Man) and his wife, as those who would become the seeds of religion on Earth, sent by God to teach animal man and animal woman the difference between right and wrong, knowledge of good and evil. Therefore, Adam became God’s first right hand man … as the first Son that would be sent “of man.”

By the time Adam had two sons, Cain and Abel, Satan influenced Cain to become the first teacher of false religion on Earth. He became the first “right hand man” of Satan, which inverts to the first to sit at the “left hand” of Adam’s (the Son’s) throne. Cain begat the goats of the world – those who profess belief in the One God (by whatever false name they call that God) – but goats are like wolves in sheep’s clothing. They serve Satan, while pretending to serve God. They are today false Christians, not true Christians.

Pan, a pagan god.

The bulk of this story told by Jesus is then about the blessing of the righteous and the cursing of the wicked. Both sheep and goats have no clue how they helped God or turned away from God. They are just dumb animals who have no knowledge of Spiritual matters. However, the righteous have allowed God into their hearts and the Christ Mind to lead their actions, while the wicked have turned a cold heart to God and their actions have been led by Big Brains (their own or the leaders to whom they bow down to in service).

If you have ever heard the phrase, “Ignorance of the Law is no excuse,” then you understand that it is never a good thing to depend on a Big Brain, if one is seeking Heaven as the Spiritual reward of one’s time on the earthly plane. The only way that one can totally comply with the Laws set forth by Moses, for all who will claim to serve only God, is to stop trying to think, “God will say this evil deed is okay, if I bend the rules this way to meet my needs.”  It is impossible to keep a brain and serve God.  You serve one or the other, never both.  Only through the influence of God can one be in total compliance of the Law; but then that righteousness means one has no clue how that happened.

You cannot serve the LORD wearing any other face before Him than His. You wear the face of God only through love of God and Him sending the Holy Spirit to you, meaning the “righteous” are Saints.  That distinction come by the rebirth of Christ Jesus – the “sheep at the right hand of Christ the King.”

Let me make this clear in modern terms. If you worship Apple (an appropriate name for the item of original sin?) and think, “An I-phone is to die for,” then have your I-phone and all its wonderful earthly rewards, and God will call that your eternal reward. Of course, I-phones only work on the earthly plane, and Spiritual angels don’t have pockets for them in Heaven.

Aliens can’t go to Heaven either.

Take that base example and apply it to every thing this world has to offer. If God sends an Apostle things, then it is for those things to be used in service of the LORD – as manna from Heaven to live on [remember not to take more than is daily necessary] or a gift of the Holy Spirit given to lead others to the LORD, through Christ.

The moral of this story can be seen in the account of the Ascension in the Book of Acts, when we read:

“And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. They also said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven.’” (Acts 1:10-11)

Do not be looking to let God in your heart and Christ into your mind at the end of the world. That “Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven,” which in the case of those who “were gazing intently” then, that coming was the next morning. At this moment you sit before Christ the King, on the throne of you, as you have for every moment of your adult life – most of which has been spent grazing as a “goat.”

It is not the declaration of Christ the King that made one a “goat” or made another a “sheep.”  It is the faces that tell Christ the King which side the individual has chosen.  Christ the King has been found by all, but the faces they all wear tell the truth.

The question, as always, is: “Are you ready to be Judged this very second?”  I mean this on the level of Holy Judgment, where only you and God know the true answer.

Keep in mind that all the world – those that are not calling themselves Christian – those “people” are happily following the little-g gods of the world: Socialism, Capitalism, Communism, Fascism, Islam, and all religions that teach the ways of Satan-Cain. Added to that count are Christians who give a little and expect a lot in return, when the god they kneel down before can be seen in a mirror placed before their face.

The world is the realm of death. Mortals are flesh and bones that are born of death. Death means an eternity of an eternal soul springing back to life an a new body.  Life means eternally a soul with God.  Heaven is only made up of righteous souls, which can be summed up as God, His Son, and the Good Angels.  “His Son” is a multiplicity of souls.

God sent His Son to lead “people” to the light of truth; but Satan will do everything in his power to turn “people” away from the truth and lead them to the darkness of lies. All the while, dumb animal man and dumb animal woman will not have a clue which way he or she is headed. Their brains are just too small.

Christ the King knows the name of every one of his “sheep.” He only has to call out, “Jesus, come here!” and they all go to his right hand, bleating, “Yes sir.”

Mark 13:24-37 – An in-depth analysis [First Sunday of Advent]

Mark 13:24-37

Jesus said, “In those days, after that suffering, the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will be falling from heaven, and the powers in the heavens will be shaken. Then they will see ‘the Son of Man coming in clouds’ with great power and glory. Then he will send out the angels, and gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of heaven.

“From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near. So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that he is near, at the very gates. Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.

“But about that day or hour no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Beware, keep alert; for you do not know when the time will come. It is like a man going on a journey, when he leaves home and puts his slaves in charge, each with his work, and commands the doorkeeper to be on the watch. Therefore, keep awake—for you do not know when the master of the house will come, in the evening, or at midnight, or at cockcrow, or at dawn, or else he may find you asleep when he comes suddenly. And what I say to you I say to all: Keep awake.”

——————————————————————————–

24. “But in those the days” , If you recall from the first Epistle of Paul to the Thessalonians, when he wrote, “for you are all children of light and children of the day , we are not of the night or of darkness” (1 Thessalonians 5:5), this statement of Mark places focus on that inner light of Christ.

“after the persecution those” , The “tribulation” (“thlipsin”) must be seen as the “persecution” that the first true Christians faced, at the hands of the Jewish synagogues and the Roman Empire. Obviously, this prophecy began soon (with the execution of Jesus) and continued for two thousand years (an Age).

“the sun will be darkened” , The “sun” is the light of Christ, which shines through the Apostles and Saints that spread true Christianity. This light will then be obscured, such that the truth will become confused, opening the door of doubt.

“and the moon not will give the light of it”; In these two segments in Greek, the words “helios” and “selene” are used to denote “sun” and “moon.” In Greek mythology, Helios and Selene were the names of the brother and sister that were the children of the Titan god Hyperion (ruler of light, wisdom and watchfulness” and his wife-sister Theia (name meaning divine; goddess, implying bright). It should be grasped how the moon reflects the light of the sun, in varying degrees – from absence (new moon) to total (full moon). Therefore, when “the moon will not give the light [of the sun reflected],” the meaning is that of new moon phase. A new moon is when the Sun and the Moon are conjunct, although this usually means the moon is unseen, because of the glare of the sun. However, when the “sun will be darkened , AND the moon not will give the light,” this is a statement of a total eclipse, where the moon perfectly aligns with the sun and the sun’s rays are completely blocked from earth (in a narrow umbra of total eclipse, with a wider penumbra of darkness).

25. “and the stars will be out of of the heaven falling” , The stars are the constellations that surround the earth, but are only visible in the night sky, when the sun’s rays are absent (and there is no cloud cover, where clouds are symbols of obscurity). The key word of this segment is “falling” (“piptontes”), which is said to have metaphorical meanings: “to be cast down from a state of prosperity” and “to fall from a state of uprightness.” When this meaning is applied to the stars of the zodiac, the circle of stars that the sun and the moon appear before (along with the other visible planets in the solar system), it says that the use of astrology – as a divine art of prophecy – will have fallen. Still, in that same context, those who promote and continue to use the stars of astrology to forecast and predict, they will have lost of light of truth and are not led as prophets of God. Thus, astrology as a divine art will have fallen into a state of disgrace. We live in such times now, as the art of divinity is discredited as having never been a tool presented to mankind as a tool for finding support for truth.

“and the powers (or inherent abilities) that in the heavens will be shaken” . Whenever one comes across the word “that” (in this case a second “hai” [“the”] is translated as “that”) it is referring the reader back to the prior verse, such that “the power” or “the inherent abilities” of astrology (“the power” of prediction as prophecy) is also a reference to “that.” The future tense word “saleuthēsontai” means the use of astrology “will be cast down” and “will be driven away” for God intended use – as a tool to guide man by [seasons, times, etc.].

26. “and then (or at that time) will they perceive (or will they look upon; will they experience; will they see) the Son the [One] of man coming in clouds” , The use of the word “then” (“tote”), like “that” in the prior segment, is referencing when “the heavens will be shaken,” or “at that time” when astrology will “fall” in the eyes of mankind. Then the perception of Jesus Christ “of man coming” will not be concretely understood, but it will gain nebulous understanding. This statement, as a perfect example, will cause people to think Jesus Christ will come down from “clouds,” like a Greek god. This statement does not say that, as it says, “will they see” Christ “coming in clouds.” Seeing is not believing. The inverse way of reading this is as when “will they experience the Son.” “At that time will they experience the Son the [One]” of God, having been sent “of man” to be “the [One] of man” in a union. This “coming,” however, cannot be seen or touched, as it is Spiritual, as though “the [One] of man coming in clouds.”

“with marvelous deeds (or abilities; power) much (or great) and the unspoken manifestation of God (or glory)” ; Transferring thought from the presence of “the Son” having returned “of man,” in humans of God’s choosing, that nebulousness “in clouds” is now stated to be “with” or “among” or “after with” (from “meta”) those “of man,” who are Apostles or Saints. This makes “in clouds” represent the Holy Spirit, which brings with it the “marvelous deeds” or “abilities,” which are the gifts of the Holy Spirit. In addition to those abilities (from “kai”), the Apostle or Saint will not be blessed for self-importance, but they will project an aura of holiness (depicted in art by halo) around them, as the “unspoken manifestation of God,” the “glory” of God’s Holy Spirit.

27. “and then he will send the messengers from God (or angels)” , The use of “then” here, as an additional step (following “and”), says that after “the power and glory” has come “of man,” through “the Son,” then God “will send messengers” to the world. While an Apostle or Saint is human in form, it has sacrificed its personal desires to fully serve God. Their primary role is to act as righteous slaves, where their actions speak for the LORD and their deeds touch others so they seek the same presence of God upon them. It is the “clouds” of the Holy Spirit that make them appear as “angels” to those whose lives they enter.

“and will gather together the chosen (or elect) of him” , Once the return of Christ has reproduced “the Son” on earth, “of man” in multiple numbers, then the next step (“and”) “will be to gather them together,” where the root Greek word is “episunagó,” meaning “to assemble.” This denotes the called out assembly that relates to a Church, where the Greek word “ekklésia” means, “an assembly, congregation, church.” This gathering is only those Apostles or Saints, those who have been “chosen of him,” which fully means they have “chosen” to be of service “to him,” all in “the same” manner as “him” [Jesus, the Son of the Father] (from the Greek word “autou”).

“from out of (or out from within) the four winds” , The key word to understand here is the number “four.” The symbolism of “four” is “foundation” or “base.” This means “four” represents the “foundation” of the “gathered together chosen,” which is the truest meaning of a Church. “From within” that “assembly” “outward” will the “breath” of God’s Holy Spirit be spread. The Greek word translated as “winds” is “anemōn,” can also mean “breaths” or “breathings.” When “four winds” is recognized as a separate entity, this becomes symbolic of the “four corners of the earth,” which then is a statement of how far the “breath” of God will be spread.

“away from end of earth to end of heaven” . In this segment, the word “end” (“akrou”) is repeated, giving it importance. The word means an “extremity” or the “highest point,” but can also mean “the end.” This has absolutely nothing to do with the End Times (which are an “extreme” time), as those are commonly understood. Instead, this statement places focus on the extent of the “breaths” of God being sent “out from within” the “assembly,” as the purpose being to lead one “away from end of earth,” which is mortal death and reincarnation. This is then meant to guide one to and “end of heaven,” which is eternal life.

28. “Separation now the fig tree” , In some English translation Biblical sites, this verse is shown to begin a new element of focus, as “The Lesson from the Fig Tree” (NASB for one). To jump to a new heading is ridiculous. This verse begins a new line of thought, but it is based on the breath of guidance “away from” mortal death, which the Greek word “Apo” means. This means the “fig tree” offers insight into the repetition of life (a tree of reproduction and lineage), where the seasons come and go, just like do the lives of mortals. The “fig tree” is also represents a commonly recognized fruit tree of ancient Israel, which was known to be producers of early figs (usually in June) and late figs (August). These fruit trees were both cultivated and found growing wild across the land. Such fruit symbolically states the purpose of that tree.

“come to realize the comparison (or parable)” ; The Greek word “parabolēn” does translate as “a parable,” but it is more meaningful in this segment as an equally valid translation as “a comparison,” as a “juxtaposition,” where the “fig tree” can be side-by-side compared with the repetition of human reincarnation. The Greek word “mathete” means “to learn” (or “come to realize”), which is Jesus the Rabbi speaking to his disciples (and likewise to us today). While this lesson is stating the botany of a tree in comparison to the biology of a human being – and thus can be termed a “parable” – it is easier “to learn” through real experience, rather than the fantasy of a story of kings and slaves that no one had ever personally known.

“when already the branch of it tender has become” , Again, we have a timing element in the word “hotan,” which means “when.” That timing is then relative to the fig tree being “already” or “now after all this waiting,” from the word “ēdē.” The first two word of Greek could translate as implying, “at the time when the condition is met, after some length of waiting.” This seems to then point to a limb of a tree, but in comparison to a human being the Greek word “klados” means “descendant” as well as “branch.” Thus, the focus of a fig tree “branch” is no different than a “branch” on a family “tree.” Still, the words that are translated as “tender has become, “the Greek word “hapalos” implies “a shoot of a tree.” Thus, Jesus was pointing out when the death of winter has ceased and new growth was at its most “tender,” having just come upon a “branch” as buds.

“and it puts forth the leaves” , As an additional stage of new development (“and”), the “tender” buds “sprout” as the fresh, green “leaves” of spring. Just as fall symbolizes dying, spring symbolizes rebirth. This means the beginning of another drive to flourish and reproduce.

“you know that near the summer is” . In the example of a “fig tree” with “leaves,” this sign (recall the original statements about the collapse of astrology, which has constellations that are the signs of the times?) is that early figs (if this type of fig tree) will come from the leaves, in June, which is the eve of summer (the summer solstice is between June 20-22). The majority of figs are produced in August, which is the height of summer. Thus, simply by seeing leaves newly on the branches of the fig trees, one knows “summer is near.” In the comparison to human beings, spring time is that time of transition from youth to reproductive. For fruit to grow, there has to be a cross pollination of the trees (by winds or bees), which is that time of young adulthood. The summer of life is a human being’s years of productivity and reproduction.

29. “In this manner also you” , This statement is self-explanatory, as Jesus pointed to his disciples (and us today) and told them they are “branches” of him, which were just budding new leaves, but soon they would produce the fruits of summer. Summer is also the time when the days are longer and the light of the sun is strongest. Just as trees spring to life when the days are longer and more sunlight makes photosynthesis keep trees thriving, the light of Christ is the motivation for “living branches” to productively reproduce others “with him the Son.”

“when you experience (or see) these things coming to pass (or happening)” , Again, the timing word “when” is used to denote “at that time when conditions are met.” Because Jesus used the pronoun “you,” he was addressing his disciples and not “fig trees.” This means the conditions that will be met has nothing to do with “branches sprouting leaf buds.” When Jesus said “these things happening,” those things were the comparison of new life coming into them. Just as a “fig tree” feels the sap flowing upward within it trunk and branches, as a sign that the season of growth has arrived, so too will the disciples of Jesus feel and up swelling within them. That personal “experience,” “discernment,” and “awareness” (from the Greek word “idēte” – a form of “horaó”) lets them know when new growth is about to spring forth in them. The “things coming to pass” will be personal to each individual, as changes within them. The “sight” “to see” will be inspired by the Holy Spirit and not limited to the light spectrum detectable by human eyes.

“know that near it is” , This aspect of “personal experience” is then stated in the Greek word “ginōskete,” which is “knowledge” of first-hand acquaintance. It becomes the certainty of understanding that is guided by the wisdom of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, when one feels a new phase of life about to happen, it will be this newfound insight that says change is “near” or “close” (from “engys”). More importantly, however, the word translated as “it is” (“estin”) is a form of saying “I am is near,” which means “it is” God. Thus, one will “know” of “these things happening” because one has come “close” to God. That “nearness” is one’s marriage to God, via the Holy Spirit.

“on the basis of (or at) an opportunity (or doors)” . This statement says that “near” God means the conditions have been “met.” The “doors” of “opportunity” has been opened (from the Greek word “thyrais”). Just as a “fig tree” needs light and warmth to stimulate it to new growth, one become “near” to God by having done everything required beforehand, during one’s engagement period prior to the marriage, when God enters one’s heart forever. God always makes those “doors” of “opportunity” available, but it is up to the human being to say, “Yes” to those proposals.

30. “Truly I say to you” , This is a common assurance by Jesus, as one married to God, that an Apostle can only “speak” the “truth” of God. His words to his disciples assure them that everything he teaches them is tried and true. Likewise, we today can be assured the truth is being told.

“that no not will have passed away (or will have become vain) the generation this” , When the topic of comparison has been a “fig tree,” where “tender young leaf shoots” are representative of the growth that is to come, the use of the Greek word “genea” means a “generation” of “family,” “of man,” “with him the Son,” where “generation” says: “All of the offspring that are at the same stage of descent from a common ancestor.” The root of that word is from Latin (“generō”), which means “to father, procreate, and beget.” The double negative (“ou – “no-not not-lest”) then speaks of “nothing” being lost from the line generated by the Father. When “a generation” is estimated to be a twenty-year period of related children, this becomes too limiting to the lineage of God, as it stretches righteously from Adam to Jesus, with all who have, are, and will come to pass come from the same Generator: God. This is therefore a statement of eternal life that is promised (“Truly I say to you”) to all who spring forth on the “tree” of holiness, which Jesus Christ has revived (“from the stump of Jesse”).

“until (or as far as, to the point) that these things all shall have taken place” . In this statement that follows “this generation” of which Jesus spoke, the limitation is stated that “these things all shall have taken place.” One cannot be reborn as Jesus Christ without doing that which is required to have everlasting life and join the tree of righteousness that makes one “a fresh, tender leaf sprout” on the “branch” that is God’s “tree” of life (as opposed to being born of death as a mortal). In this statement, one should be aware that Jesus spoke to twelve disciples on the Mount of Olives. That number included Judas Iscariot, who becomes the example of how death would take him before the Holy Spirit descended upon the disciples, transforming them into Apostles. Judas Iscariot did not get “as far as” the “point” (from the Greek word “mechris”) when “these things all shall have taken place.” That lesson is the foremost for all future “generations” of the churches, and all who claim to be Christians. Judas made the claim as a follower, but then he sold his soul for material reward.

31. “The heaven and the earth will pass away (or will become vain)” , This has nothing to do with suggesting the end of the earth or the end of heaven – either outer space/skies (physical heavens) or the spiritual place called Heaven. The two words translated as “The” and “the” (Ho and ) both can indicate the “condition” to be met for one or the other, as “Condition heaven and condition earth.” This is then stating the “circumstances” that will dictate how one’s soul “will pass away; will come to pass; or will happen” (from the Greek word “pareleusontai”). It says that each individual will choose which path “will become vain,” where “vain” is defined as: “Not yielding the desired outcome; fruitless.” One will either call “heaven” “fruitless,” and choose “earth,” or vice versa.

“them on the other hand divine utterances (or words) of me no not will pass away (or will become vain)” . In this segment, the Greek text does not translate anything for the word “hoi,” which is the plural form of the article “the,” often translated with “polloi,” as “the many.” I have translated it as “them,” which becomes an indicator of “the [ones],” and “them” becomes the focus of those who choose “heaven,” because “on the other hand” indicates the ones who did not choose “earth” as their way to “pass away.” We can be safe in this assumption because Jesus added it will be “them” who believed the “divine utterances” (reading “logoi” from its Biblical definition, indicating holy “words”) “of [Jesus].” This becomes the promise of truth that those who heed the “words of him” (Jesus) “will not pass away” or find the way of the LORD as “vain.”

32. “Circumstances (or Concerning) on the other hand the day that” , In the Epistle reading of Proper 28 (1 Thessalonians 5:1-11) the first verse stated, “Concerning moreover the times and the seasons.” That verse begins with the same word beginning this verse in Mark’s chapter 13 – “Peri.” In my interpretation of Paul’s letter, I wrote this:

“The word “peri” means, “about, concerning,” and “around,” which “denotes place, cause or subject.” Its implied usage infers, “consideration where ‘all the bases are covered.’” As such, the important focus by the capitalization of this states, “Circumstances now” or “Conditions on top of.””

That part of Paul’s letter dealt with the “circumstances” and “conditions met,” as whether or not one would truly be deemed Christian. Following the statement in the segment prior here, about “on the other hand divine,” here we find “on the other hand” the “conditions met” that will determine “the day” of “that” choice – eternal life (“heaven”) or eternal reincarnation (“earth”). The implication in this segment is those who chose “the earth,” with “the day” being “that” of death.

“or the hour (or time)” , In this segment the focus is on “time,” where “hour” can be read as a specific “time,” but is commonly recognized as a statement that focuses on “time” running out, having reached the final “hour.” This is then the most critical “hour” when human life is about to come to an end and the soul will lose its host body.

“no one knows” ; When Jesus used the word “oudeis,” which translates as “no one, not one, none, nothing, and others,” this word categorically excludes anyone. This exclusion can allow one to see “no man” or “no one” as those who said “no” to “heaven,” instead choosing “earth” as their target of worship and devotion. Because those who choose “heaven” receive the “knowledge” of the Holy Spirit, as the Christ Mind from God, the physical process of bodily death is not a traumatic event for ‘yes ones’. However, to those whose physical life has taken on considerable importance, they would love to know when death is near, so they could repent and choose “heaven.” They will not possess that luxury of knowledge.

“not even the messengers of God (or angels) in heaven” , Following that understanding, this segment can be read two ways, with both being the truth. First, it simply says that the same lack of knowing when death will occur will be “not even” allowed to those who are Apostles – the “messengers of God” – who chose “heaven.” Still, its most powerful meaning says that the “conditions” set for those who choose “earth” will not be placed on those who chose to serve God. They will be notified by “angels” when death is near, and they will escort those souls to the crossover into eternal life in “heaven.” This says those “angels” will be notified by God when that service will be needed.

“nor the Son” , This segment than restates support for the “no one knows” segment, as those who chose “no” to “heaven,” such that those chose not to allows “the Son” to be reborn within them. Without “the Son,” they will “not know.” Still, the presence of “the Son” in Apostles and Saints means lives directed towards saving other souls, where death is not feared by them. To dwell on such an “hour” or “time” is pointless. Also, keep in mind that Jesus knew when his death would occur, as well as that of Lazarus.

“if not the Father” . This segment basically says that those whose choice is not to serve the Father (be married to God), then they will not know, due to choosing “earth.” The word “ei” clearly translates as “if,” where that conjunction implies an alternative choice (if this, then that).

33. “Take heed (or perceive; discern)” , This is a warning to all who have decided “if not the Father,” choosing to serve self on “earth.” The Greek word “Blepete” says to be “Careful.” It says to “Keep watch,” as their choice means they “will not know” when death will come.

“be awake (or watch)” ; The Greek word “agrypneite” then gives reason for “Taking heed” to what Jesus has said. A command to “be awake” means to not fall asleep. As has been discussed in prior letters of Paul and Jesus upon hearing news of Lazarus’ illness, sleep is metaphor for death. Thus, the warning to “Take heed” and be “Careful” is directed towards staying “alert” and “watchful.”

“not you know indeed when the time (or occasion; opportunity) is” . This is the message of several parables (Parable of the Rich Fool; Parable of the Ten Bridesmaids; and Parable of the Faithful Servant), where not knowing when death will come makes staying awake so important. However, if one has already been married to God and is led by the Christ Mind, one is always “alert.”

34. “Like a man away on a journey” , This verse begins similarly as the Parable of the Talents, where verse 14 states “anthrōpos apodēmōn,” as “a man going on a journey.” Similar words are written here (“anthrōpos apodēmos”). As interpreted in the Proper 28 Gospel article, the master was not the one going on a journey, but his slaves were going on a journey for the master. Here, that is clearer. However, in this context, the man is akin to a soul on a journey away from heaven, gone to enjoy a trip to the material world. In relation to not knowing the time, this becomes a parallel to knowing one needs to return home, but has lost the tickets to travel there and has forgotten the date and hour of the trip back home.

“having left the dwelling (or house; property) of him” , Here again, the use of the word “autou,” meaning “of him,” the intent is to state “a man” having left the “dwelling” of the Father. Because this follows a segment that speaks of “a man,” it is easy to be confused and think “a man” left his own home. That is a purely physical reading. Because Jesus is speaking of Spiritual matters, it is “a man’s” soul that left the Spiritual “dwelling” of heaven, where the Father resides.

“having placed (or having given) the servants (or slaves) of him the authority (or influence)” , Like in the Parable of the Talents, the false assumption was that the master had left “servants” in charge, while the master went on “a journey.” The same mistake can be made here, by thinking “a man” had “slaves” who were given “authority” in his absence. The true meaning is that God is the owner of the “dwelling” from which “a man” left, which makes that “man” the “servant” of God, the Father. It is this “influence” of God over the soul that calls this “man” back home, reminding the soul of “a man’s” servitude.

“to each one the work (or task) of him” , As a servant of God, an Apostle or Saint has the responsibility of speaking as God will have them speak. The task is to seek others who want to know God intimately.

“and the doorkeeper (or gatekeeper; porter) he commanded (or he instructed; he gave orders) he should be watchful (or he should be vigilant; he should be awake; he should be alert)” . Since Jesus was “the Son” sent “of man” to perform a “task” for the Father, sent from his Father’s “house,” he was teaching his disciples that he was “the doorkeeper” to “heaven.” He had claimed this earlier, when he said he was the “gate” to the sheepfold. Thus, Jesus was warning his disciples; but all who would become reborn as “the Son,” with the Mind of Christ, married to God, they too would keep that “portal” to “heaven” open, through the Gospel, as “messengers of God” (their “task” and “work”). As such the Greek word “thyrōrō” says Apostles will “keep the door” to “heaven” available to those who seek entrance into God’s kingdom.

35. “Watch (or Be alert; Be awake) therefore” This repeats the warning to “Stay awake” and be “Alert,” but adds the word “oun,” which means “therefore,” but: “By extension, here’s how the dots connect.” (HELPS Word Studies). The “dots” to connect then follow the two dashes, which act as a colon mark.

“not you know indeed” , Reason to stay awake and keep alert number one: You do not know when death will make you go to sleep, before you are prepared to cheat death.

“when the master of the house (or dwelling; property) comes” : The master is God, who comes to call a soul away from its material body. This is a known coming, whenever a soul is born into a physical form. This is the definition of death, where all forms of matter are born to die (change states); but the timing of that death is not fixed, so it cannot be known in advance.

“or at evening” , This is the first of four “night watches” in the Hebrew day. The first “watch” is from 6:00 PM until 9:00 PM (possibly only 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM), which is called the “evening” watch. The evening, depending on the time of the year, is when light from the sun may make “watching” easier, seeing things coming from further off. Still, with all the activity of settling in, it is easier to stay awake during this time of “night.”

“or at midnight (or night)” , This is the second of four “night watches,” which lasts from 9:00 PM to “midnight” (possibly from 8:00 PM until midnight). This is year-round a time of darkness, with the height of summer lending some small amount of twilight at the beginning of this watch. Still, as this “watch” wears on, the eyes get heavier.

“or when the rooster crows” , This is the third of four “night watches,” which begins at midnight and ends at 3:00 AM (possibly between midnight and 4:00 AM). This is the depth of “night” and when sleep wants to take hold, as there is no light other than that of the moon’s reflections of sunlight. This is often called “the graveyard shift.”

“or morning” ; This is the fourth of four “night watches,” where the wait is for the break of “day,” at 6:00 AM. This “watch” begins at 3:00 AM and leads to the official beginning of “day.” There is morning glow that begins to wear away the abject darkness.

36. “not (or lest) having come suddenly (or unexpectedly)” , This segment, following the pause of a semi-colon, says the connecting of the dots of “Vigilance” were necessary through all of the divisions of night, when darkness is symbolic of death. Thus, if one does “not” keep all the watches of nigh, then the moment sleep takes over death comes “suddenly,” “unexpectedly.” Death is always known to be coming, but the “hour” of night never known.

“he should discover (or he should find) you sleeping” . Again, the third-person masculine pronoun “he” is attached to the conditional form of “heurē,” as “he should find, because “he” is the Father of all souls. The word “sleeping” (“katheudontas”) is metaphor for “death.” This means the soul will “find” God at its moment of release from the physical body. This is when judgment will come, relative to the soul deserving eternal life in “heaven,” of deserving to be reborn of death in a body of matter. That discovery will be a matter of record in the heavenly book of records.

37. “Which (or What) on the other hand (or moreover) to you I say” , Here, Jesus is pointing out how it will be his voice, inside the head of Apostles and Saints, who will guide one to “the other hand” of Salvation. Instead of God finding a released soul from an unexpected death, when the soul had not served the LORD in physical form, Jesus will have his disciples prepared.

“to all I say” , It will thus be through all subsequent Apostles and Saints (who wrote the Gospels and Epistles and who spread the Word of Christianity) that Jesus will “say to all” in the future – this and every lesson he taught that has been recorded in Scripture.

“Watch (or Be alert; Be awake)” ! Jesus tells all Apostles and Saints how to be “Awake,” which is the permanent state of everlasting Life, as opposed to the sleep of death and the repeating of past failures on earth.

Mark 1:1-8 – John the baptizer foretold [Second Sunday of Advent]

The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

As it is written in the prophet Isaiah,

“See, I am sending my messenger ahead of you,
who will prepare your way;
the voice of one crying out in the wilderness:
‘Prepare the way of the Lord,
make his paths straight,’”

John the baptizer appeared in the wilderness, proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. And people from the whole Judean countryside and all the people of Jerusalem were going out to him, and were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. Now John was clothed with camel’s hair, with a leather belt around his waist, and he ate locusts and wild honey. He proclaimed, “The one who is more powerful than I is coming after me; I am not worthy to stoop down and untie the thong of his sandals. I have baptized you with water; but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.”

——————————————————————————————————

This is the Gospel reading for the second Sunday of Advent.  Advent bears this etymology: “Middle English, borrowed from Medieval Latin adventus, going back to Latin, “arrival, appearance,” from adven-, variant stem of advenīre “to arrive” (from ad- ad-  + venīre” to come,” going back to Indo-European *gwem-i̯̯e-) + -tus, suffix of action nouns — more at come.” (Merriam Webster).  While it might be easy to think this season announces the nearing of the birthday of baby Jesus, the real purpose is to have baby Jesus be reborn in new Christians.  If you keep that concept in mind, the Gospel readings during Advent will take on a personal importance as Scripture readings of preparation.  F.Y.I.

Will you let Him in when He calls to you? Will you reply, “Here I am!”

The quote above, from Isaiah, is found in Isaiah 40:3, but it is not exactly as Mark indicated. The NASB translation of that verse says, “A voice of one calling, “Clear the way for the Lord in the wilderness; Make smooth in the desert a highway for our God.” The use of “desert” can also state “wilderness,” and the use of wilderness can be replaced with “desert.” The first element, “See, I am sending my messenger ahead of you” is missing.

The point is this quote is not wholly from Isaiah, as it is also a partial quote from Malachi 3:1. That verse states, “Behold, I am going to send My messenger, and he will clear the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, will suddenly come to His temple; and the messenger of the covenant, in whom you delight, behold, He is coming,” says the Lord of hosts.” Combine these quotes of the LORD from those two prophets and Mark’s quote is complete.

To me, simply from finding out this unstated combined quote, where the truth was told by Mark because Isaiah is quoted, the lack of mentioning Malachi is a hidden sign. Since Mark goes from the prophet’s words of prophecy from the LORD, to speaking of John the Baptizer, the element of a preparing a straight path in the wilderness was fulfilled by John. This focus is then enhanced and clarified further, when one reads Malachi 4:5-6.

Those verses state: “Behold, I am going to send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord. He will restore the hearts of the fathers to their children and the hearts of the children to their fathers, so that I will not come and smite the land with a curse.” This prophecy of Elijah being sent prior to the coming of the Messiah was one all Jews knew at the time of Jesus and awaited.

One of the rituals of the Passover Seder meal is to pour a cup of wine and open the front door of the home open. In another rite, a chair is designated for Elijah to sit in at each circumcision.  The reason is to invite Elijah to return. The Jews want Elijah to feel welcome to join the family. When these tradition began, I do not know. However, Mark wrote about Elijah’s return.

In Mark 9:11-13, as Jesus and Peter, James and John (of Zebedee) were coming down from the high mountain after the Transfiguration, Jesus told them not to talk about what they had seen until after “the Son of Man rose from the dead” (Mark 9:9). The conversation then turned to Elijah:

“They asked [Jesus], saying, “Why is it that the scribes say that Elijah must come first?” And He said to them, “Elijah does first come and restore all things. And yet how is it written of the Son of Man that He will suffer many things and be treated with contempt? But I say to you that Elijah has indeed come, and they did to him whatever they wished, just as it is written of him.”” (Mark 9:11-13)

Matthew added to this, “Then the disciples understood that [Jesus] had spoken to them about John the Baptist.” (Matthew 17:13)

This means that understanding Isaiah AND Malachi combined to write about John the Baptizer, as Elijah returning, one can understand the description given by Mark as that of a reincarnated prophet of Israel. When we read, “Now John was clothed with camel’s hair, with a leather belt around his waist,” Elijah was described in this manner: “They replied, “He had a garment of hair and had a leather belt around his waist.” The king said, “That was Elijah the Tishbite.”’ (1 Kings 1:8, NIV)

Print this and let the kids color in the hairy tunic and leather belt.

Relative to this prophecy, but buried by a translation attempting to tell a story, rather than expose the truth, is the Greek word “Egeneto.” That capitalized first word that follows the quotes of the prophets is the past tense form of the word “ginomai” (“to come”). It means this prophecy “Came” true in the one named “John.” The first segment simply says, “Egeneto Iōannēs,” “Came John.” It means Elijah “Came” and was named “John.”  The name “Ioannes” means “Yahweh is Gracious.”

After that identification (following a comma), John is said to be “the [one] baptizing in the wilderness.” This is then a confirmation of the prophecy, “Clear a way for the Lord in the wilderness; Make smooth in the wilderness a highway for our God.” The word “baptizó” means “to submerge,” which implies the use of water, which is a scarce commodity in a desert, wilderness, or desolate area. Therefore, this is more powerful symbolically than the imagery a modern Christian gets from a translation that says, “John the baptizer appeared in the wilderness.”

The wilderness (from “erēmō”) means “solitary, desolate, and deserted.” It implies “waste,” such that “desert” is land that bears no yield. Thus, that place is “abandoned” or “deserted.” More than picturing John, a holy man that fulfilled the prophecy of Elijah’s return (reincarnation), in a desert, one needs to grasp how “John Came” to Judea and Galilee.  Those provinces were the wastes of ancient Israel and Judah. The remnant peoples of those lands had returned to the waste land their ancestors had left to captors and conquerors. That land had been lost because of the sins of Israel’s leaders and followers.

Following another comma, the Greek text literally states, “and proclaiming baptism of repentance for forgiveness of sins.” As for the dryness of a “desert,” water (once again) is the element that symbolizes emotions. John was doing more than “dipping” Jews “underwater,” he was infusing them with the emotional awareness of their sins. Only from being in touch emotionally with the dryness and waste of their having lost their land and their covenant with God could they truly repent. The Jews of Roman-controlled Judea and Galilee had to feel the guilt of their dirty selves deeply, in order for the truth to be written: “People from the whole Judean countryside and all the people of Jerusalem were going out to him, and were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.”

The symbolic water that washed over the Jews, as the “people went out to John,” was the emotion of their guilt.  The realization of seeing themselves going the wrong way filled them with fear. That water, rather than John coming to offer a washing away of sins with river water service, was the baptism that made a straight path for the Lord.

Physical water evaporates but living water remains forever.

Now, when we reach verse six, which said what John was wearing, the segment that follows is not set in the past tense (as the translation above shows “ate”). Instead, the Greek word “esthōn” is the present participle stating, “he is eating.” The essence of this difference in time says John was the reincarnation of Elijah, who dressed in animal skins with a leather belt; but John is then “eating locusts and honey wild.”

Since there is nothing about Elijah that specifically said he ate locusts and wild honey, and since there has to be more meaning to this information than John possessing survival skills in the wilderness, the metaphor has to help explain John’s purpose as Elijah reincarnated. Because “locusts” are infesting creatures that eat the fields and trees, as a plague that takes away the productivity of a land, John was “devouring” those who were stripping the Jews of their ways of righteousness (Jews and Gentiles). He also was dissolving the stickiness of “honey” that represented the ways of other nations.  Those ways tasted so sweet, but led the Jews to “wild” lives.  It was symbolic locusts and wild honey that led to the fall and ruin of Israel – a land once known for its milk and honey.  Elijah returned as John to devour those enemies.

By seeing this meaning and knowing John to be the return of Elijah, who was prophesied to pave the way of the Lord – the Messiah – it is easy to see why Mark wrote what John proclaimed: “The one who is more powerful than I is coming after me.” This was a prophecy also told by Luke, where the angel Gabriel appeared to Zacharias, the husband of Elizabeth (who would give birth to John), saying: “And [John] will turn many of the sons of Israel back to the Lord their God. It is he who will go as a forerunner before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers back to the children, and the disobedient to the attitude of the righteous, so as to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.” (Luke 1:16-17)

As Jesus would be born six months after John, with the two relatives, Jesus would be the Lord of whom John said, “I am not worthy to stoop down and untie the thong of his sandals.” John said that as a miracle child, just as was Jesus, who was born to another woman without the necessity of sexual intercourse. Elizabeth was like Sarah, as both women were old of age and barren (thus not a virgin). As the rebirth of the Spirit of Elijah, John was still not worthy of claiming any greatness, when compared to Jesus the Christ.

Finally, when John said, “I have baptized you with water; but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit,” the element of water goes beyond the physical once again. To be “baptized with water” is more than being dipped underwater or sprinkled with water. It means John will renew an emotion of devotion to God and belief in the Messiah. That will lead to Jews seeking forgiveness from God; but the physical means they will seek to follow someone holy.

Just as physical water pours over one, so too does the presence of a leader-rabbi pour the enthusiasm of devotion to him onto his followers. John had that effect on his disciples. Yet, Jesus would have a greater impact in the physical; but his impact as Lord would be when he poured himself into his devoted followers, making them become the extension of love of God, as Christ reborn.

That prophecy by Elijah-John came true on Pentecost, when the “Holy Spirit baptized” eleven disciples in the upstairs room, replacing one Jesus of Nazareth (born in Bethlehem) with eleven. That power of eleven was the difference John spoke of.

John 1:6-8, 19-28 – What’s in a name? [Third Sunday of Advent]

There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came as a witness to testify to the light, so that all might believe through him. He himself was not the light, but he came to testify to the light.

This is the testimony given by John when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, “Who are you?” He confessed and did not deny it, but confessed, “I am not the Messiah.” And they asked him, “What then? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the prophet?” He answered, “No.” Then they said to him, “Who are you? Let us have an answer for those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?” He said, “I am the voice of one crying out in the wilderness, ‘Make straight the way of the Lord,’” as the prophet Isaiah said. Now they had been sent from the Pharisees. They asked him, “Why then are you baptizing if you are neither the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the prophet?” John answered them, “I baptize with water. Among you stands one whom you do not know, the one who is coming after me; I am not worthy to untie the thong of his sandal.” This took place in Bethany across the Jordan where John was baptizing.

—————————————————————————————————–

This is the Gospel reading for the third Sunday of Advent, Year B 2017. Again, the focus turns to John the Baptizer coming, who was questioned as to his qualifications for baptizing Jews. He told them, as Isaiah had prophesied, “I am the voice of one crying out in the wilderness, ‘Make straight the way of the Lord.”’

As the reader will notice, there are omissions from the text of John’s Gospel, such that we begin reading at verse 6, then skip over verses 9 through 18, before picking back up at verse 19. The simple reason is John was not completely zeroed in on John the baptizer, as focus shifted from Jesus (as the Word and the Light), to John, to Jesus, and to John again. In my mind, this raises a question about verses 6 through 8.

First of all, the theological scholars (some at least) seem to think the Gospel of John was written by the disciple-Apostle John of Zebedee. I strongly disagree with that conclusion, simply because the perspective of John of Zebedee would have mirrored that of Matthew and Mark, which it does not. The Gospel of John has “insider information” that was not written of by the two disciples of Jesus, plus it places a different perspective on events the disciples recorded, and it leaves out events remembered by the two. John, obviously (if looking closely), was not a disciple but a family member of Jesus. Therefore, he calls himself “the one whom Jesus loved.”

Second, the Greek name Ioannes is used to name no less than six Johns: John the Baptist, John of Zebedee, John of Patmos, the father of Simon-Peter (Simon BarjonaMatthew 16:17), a Levite of high-priestly descent (Acts 4:6), and a man also known as Mark (Acts 12:12) [ref.]. The name meaning “Yahweh is Gracious” says parents commonly gave that name to their children, simply from seeing a son as a gift from God.

Sometimes a good name needs to go to more than one person.

Still, if John of Zebedee is not the author of the Gospel of John, then the writer here becomes either a new John or one of the other Johns. Because John the baptizer did not live to write a book, and because the father of Simon-Peter and the two men named in Acts are highly unlikely to have written of close-encounters as memories of Jesus, the only likely John would be that of John of Patmos. I believe this is the case.  Those two are the same person, at different ages.

Third, this issue over who wrote the Gospel of John is due to it being an “anonymous” author, meaning the title is not explained in a ‘foreword’ or preface. In fact, none of the four Gospels have explicitly named authors, with all possibly written by an unnamed person of letters, through divine recital, with the person reciting the accounts of Jesus being first-hand eyewitnesses. Unlike the epistles, where the author is usually identified at the beginning of the letter, the four Gospels do not follow that practice of self-naming. However, seeing how the Gospel of John is so differently approached than the other three Gospels, verses 6 through 8 of John’s Gospel may actually serve the purpose of naming the author, rather than naming John the baptizer twice.

It should be understood that the power of Scripture is it all comes from the Mind of God. Thus, it is beyond the comprehension of mankind’s simple brains (in comparison to the Godhead). As such, nothing written can be said to be fixed by one concrete meaning, as derived through the application of syntax – the rule of language devised by mankind, different from language to language. This means the use of “John” in John 1:6 can mean both: naming the author as John; while rightfully implying John who would be a voice crying out in the wilderness. After all, both were witnesses that would testify to the light of Christ.

In verse 6, the Greek (with punctuation) makes the statement, “Came a man having been sent [as a messenger] from God,” followed by “name the same John” (where the Greek word “autō” can emphasize “self,” be the personal pronoun “he, she, it,” or imply “the same.” Since John’s Gospel referred to himself in the third person and never directly named himself, by reading the Greek as saying the “messenger sent by God” was “the same” as another named “John,” the author has just indirectly named himself. Still, all writers of book deemed Holy are written by “messengers sent by God.” John the baptizer was a “messemger sent by God” to proclaim the coming of “one who would come after him,” making his soul be that of the “messenger sent by God” that was Elijah, reborn in new flesh, the same as Jesus was a “messenger sent by God” to be announced by John the baptizer. The divine soul raised in all “messengers sent by God” is that of Adam – the Yahweh elohim made for that purpose on Day seven. So, “Yahweh is Gracious” (the meaning of the name “John”) in all “messengers He sends.”

Because the omitted verses (9 through 18) follow John’s statement that “John” was “a witness to testify to the light, so that all might believe through him,” going into some details of the divinity of Jesus as the Christ, one must realize that Jesus and John the baptizer were both lights that disciples were attracted to. As relatives of blood, they knew of one another through family affairs, such that both held the love of a brother for each other. Still, one does not glimpse a picture of Jesus ever being a follower of John the baptizer, such that John knew Jesus as the light.  The reader of the New Testament books do not get a feel for a close, adult relationship between the two, with both born with purpose that drove them on separate paths for God.

The Gospel of John is itself a testimony of that light of Christ.  John the Beloved, as a writer of a Gospel, was most devoted to being a witness “that all might believe through Jesus.” On the other hand, when John the baptizer was imprisoned, he sent word to Jesus saying, “Are you the one who is to come?” (Luke 7:20; Matthew 11:3)” implying his belief was wavering.  With the Baptist’s death, there was nothing more John could do to bring believers to Jesus.

Once this selection focuses on the clear verbiage that is of John the baptizer, we see how the “priests and Levites of Jerusalem” came to question John’s authority. John confessed and did not contradict anything said prior, which means he owned up to being one baptizing people, but denied being the Christ. They then asked if he was Elijah, to which he said, “No.” They asked if he was a prophet, inferring one who presumably had prophesied the coming of the Messiah, to which John said, “No.” This confused the priests and Levites, so they asked who John was, to which he paraphrased Isaiah 40:3-4.

That response led the Temple employees to run back to Jerusalem and tell the Pharisees (the Lawyers) what evidence they had collected on John. So the Pharisees returned to Bethany, on the other side of the Jordan, and asked John in whose name did he wash Jews of their sins.  If he was neither the Messiah, Elijah, nor a prophet, then who sent him?

John then told them that there was to be one after him who was greater than he. The implication was the true Messiah.  Of course, he meant Jesus (as far as our Big Brains of hindsight tell us), but because Jesus had yet to enter his ministry, John might not have known exactly who that greater one would be. This would mean John simply spoke from the power of the Holy Spirit, much as did Simon-Peter, when he blurted out that Jesus was the Son of God, the Messiah.

The element of interest in this dual exchange of authority is that it parallels 2 Kings 1:9-12, where twice an evil king sent “a captain of fifty with his fifty” to ask Elijah to come down from a hill. Each time the captain said, “O man of God, the king says, ‘Come down.’” Each time Elijah replied, “If I am a man of God, let fire come down from heaven and consume you and your fifty.” Since Elijah was a man of God, each time “fire came down from heaven and consumed him and his fifty.”

Fire can wash away sins as well. However, baptism by fire requires a special permit.

This becomes an unspoken parallel of Elijah and John the baptizer, which means that John the “man” of God did not know Elijah, Isaiah, or even the Messiah. He just knew he was John, just as Elijah knew nothing of his reincarnations. Confessing and not denying is one thing, but please do not try to put words in the mouths of God’s servants.

Questioning the authority of righteousness is not something any human mortal can claim, as that “of God” part cannot be proved.  Let God speak for Himself.  Thus, when one starts thinking “I am somebody!” then one rapidly finds out “You are nobody special.” That reality makes one realize just how unworthy that one is.  So unworthy that one cannot even stoop to untie the thong of the sandal of the Most Holy.

As an Advent lesson, where Advent prepares those who think they are special in this world, suggesting through Scripture the need to reassess who is most important in the grand scheme of things, we all should be confessing and not denying that it is God.  God is the reason for the season … always.

In this Western culture of commercialized America, where out-buying and out-spending for December 25th seems to be an expression of self love (more than love of God or Jesus Christ), modern children are taught the value of things more than the value of God in one’s heart.  We praise that a little baby that was born in Bethlehem long ago … not in the place you now sit reading this.

There is no reason to say Jesus is the light, if one has no light of awareness about spiritual matters within oneself. The element of gifting in December is only about God wanting to give Christ to His servants. That can happen anytime, but the Church wants to drive that point home as a Christmas message (hopefully).

The cost of that gift is complete self-sacrifice to God. No credit cards allowed.  No lay-away plans or easy pay installments. Just do whatever God says do, when God says do it.  In return for that devotion and submission, little baby Jesus will be born in you, so you become the Son of God (regardless of your human gender).

That is truly the gift that keeps on giving.

Post Script: I wrote this in 2017. In 2018 a dawning came to me. By late 2019 I published a book entitled The Star of Bethlehem: The Timing of the Life of Jesus. In that book I detail how the books of Matthew and Luke make it clear that Jesus was born on the eve of Shavuot, on 5 Sivan (a Shabbat). I was led by Yahweh to discern the precise date of birth and time of birth, to go along with the place of birth (Bethlehem) and cast a most remarkable astrological chart that is most holy to see.

In 2020, as I was interpreting an Advent 4 reading from Luke 1, as I read the passages that connected the story of Gabriel coming to Mary – those of Gabriel going to Zechariah, telling him his old wife was pregnant (with John the baptizer) – I realized I missed a most important bit of evidence, one that cemented everything I had published in my book. That revelation is this:

Elizabeth became pregnant in the first month (ecclesiatical) in the Hebrew calendar, or Nissan. Most likely, because Zechariah was doing his duty in the Temple, that duty was related to the yearly Passover activities. When one sees that as Nissan 15 (or so), then when Gabriel went to Mary and told her Elizabeth was six months pregnant (when Mary became pregnant), that would be somewhere in the middle of the sixth ecclestiacal month of the Hebrew calendar, which is Elul. Elul, just so happens to be closely aligned with the time when the sun is in the zodiac sign Virgo – Latin for “the Virgin.”

When you do the math, adding nine months to Nissan leads to the ecclestical month Tivet, which is between December 1 and January 2. This then equates roughly to the Winter Solstice (Roman calendar December 21-22). This says John the baptizer was born when Christians recognize Christmas. Adding nine months to Elul leads to Sivan.

Just thought I would let you know that the Advent focus on John the baptizer has some hidden meaning, which had never seen before. Only just recently did that dawn on me (2023).

Luke 1:26-38 – Finding favor with the LORD [Fourth Sunday of Advent]

In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. And he came to her and said, “Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.” But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be. The angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” The angel said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God. And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month for her who was said to be barren. For nothing will be impossible with God.” Then Mary said, “Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word.” Then the angel departed from her.

——————————————————————————————————

This is the Gospel selection for the fourth Sunday of Advent, Year B. It will be read aloud in church by a priest on Christmas Eve, December 24, 2017. This reading strongly states that Christmas near the end of December (the twelfth month of a modern civil calendar) has absolutely nothing to do with the physical birth of baby Jesus. Therefore, December 25th is a date that the Church created, relative to when Christ is born anew in one of deep devotion to God, with belief that Jesus resurrected from the dead and ascended to God for the purpose of returning in those who strongly have faith.

When we read that the angel Gabriel came to Mary “in the sixth month,” this becomes a solid marker of when conception occurred. The “sixth month” is not June, as Americans know a calendar. The “sixth month” is the month Elul, in the Hebrew calendar. Elul occurs (depending on the year) somewhere between August and September. Simply from knowing when Mary conceived the child that would be named Jesus, we can add nine months and realize: 1.) The birth had nothing to do with December; and 2.) Nine months after the “sixth month” would make the birth occur in “the third month” – Sivan, which is roughly May or June.[1]

Because Mary rushed off to visit Elizabeth (Luke 1:39-45), whose pregnancy occurred when Gabriel appeared to the priest Zacharias, her husband (Luke 1:5-17), we can then assume Gabriel’s visit to Elizabeth took place in the twelfth month, or six months prior to Mary conceiving Jesus. In that case, Elizabeth began to carry the baby to be named John in the Hebrew month Adar (February or March).

The Hebrew calendar makes adjustments for “leap year, such that “A leap year occurs 7 times in the 19-year Metonic cycle.” (Ref.) Because Gabriel told Mary that Elizabeth was six months pregnant (“in the sixth month”) there was no thirteenth month in between. Thus, John would have been born in the ninth month [Kislev], which is roughly in November-December. This means Mary visited Elizabeth three months before John was born (between August and September), when the fetus was developed enough to “leap in the womb.”

Let me veer off course and address the timing of Christmas in late December.  It is not a date to recognize Jesus-mass, simply because Jesus was born in the Hebrew month Sivan.  We know that by Biblical record – here, in this reading.  It is most important to grasp that Gabriel showing up to announce, “Now you are with child,” was not because he (an angel) made that decision.  God knows all, from the beginning to the end, and He does not plan for His Son to be born randomly AND especially near the Winter solstice, when the sun is lowest on the horizon (Northern Hemisphere) and the light of day is shortest.  Jesus was born as a gift from God, at the time when Moses brought down the First gift from God.  [HINT: Pentecost is a most special day for God giving to the world … in Sivan.]  December represents the dark night of the soul in mortals, when they plead earnestly for the LORD to save them.  So, Christ-mass is when mortals awaken from their material slumber and “man up” [become Jesus reborn].  That said, I will now continue where I left off.

Now, much issue has been taken in respect of a virgin birth. Little argument seems to rise about Elizabeth – “in her old age” – having become pregnant, “who was said to be barren.” It was news to Zacharias, her husband, who said to Gabriel, “How will I know this for certain? For I am an old man and my wife is advanced in years.” (Luke 1:18) The implication of that protest (which would make Zacharias mute until John was born) was he and Elizabeth had not had sex recently enough to bring about her being pregnant in the normal way.  As such, she too had a “miracle” child in her womb.  The point is to stop overthinking how God can do anything to people long gone, because that makes one under-think what Scripture is trying to tell you about virgin births.

Adam was a virgin when God pulled Eve out of him.

As an Advent lesson, where all who seek the presence of the Holy Spirit of God are largely lost in that quest, it should be preached that those who sit in church pews (men and women), Sunday after Sunday, are exactly like Elizabeth and Mary. A “Christian” without the gifts of the Holy Spirit, having not yet given birth to their own personal Jesus (to replace their self-ego), is either old and barren or young and a virgin. [This has absolutely nothing to do with any human’s sex organs!] Each Christian-to-be (meaning one who is  not yet pregnant with the Son of God inside) must be greeted by Gabriel, who says, “Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.” Gabriel must then also add, “You have found favor with God.”

The LORD is only with those He favors because His favorites are those who He has taken as His wives (regardless of human gender). You might even go as far as to say that God favors those more whose minds are not led by their sex organs – loving sex more than God. One is favored by God by opening one’s heart for the LORD, offering oneself in marriage to that righteous presence, and then being totally subservient to His Will.

You have to be favored before the “miracle” birth of Jesus will come. That miracle is due to the Holy Spirit of God. Thus, Gabriel told Mary, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God.” This was the promise when the physical baby Jesus was born; but it is the same for all who will be reborn as Jesus. True Christians are deemed Holy (a Saint) as the Son of God (regardless of human gender).

This means Christ-mass is a personal birthday for a Christian celebrating Eucharist with the Trinity, where that Christian (male or female) is in one Father-Son-Holy Spirit.  It is that date and time when an individual Christian is reborn as baby Jesus.  It becomes the day to sing Happy Re-birthday to you!  That can be any day of the year; but collectively all Christians celebrate together when the sun has reached its lowest point in the sky, in late December (civil calendar).  Then, everyone knows the light will grow brighter and the days will grow longer over the coming months.

Just as the angel of the LORD told Mary, “you will name him Jesus” – a name that bears the meaning “Yah[weh] Will Save” – so too will all who are reborn by the Holy Spirit retain that name. The new name becomes a statement of one’s having been Saved by God. That is how Jesus Saves!

When Gabriel then told Mary, “He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end,” this is defining the Christ – the Messiah. Just as Jesus told Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm” (John 18:36), Jesus Christ sits at the right hand of God, but his kingdom extends to souls still in human forms on earth. It is the Kingdom of Christianity, where all subjects have been reborn in the name of Jesus, blessed with the Christ Mind, in a loving relationship with God.

The kingdom of Christ only has subjects who go out as lights to lead the world to also seek to be subjects of God and Christ.  The ultimate lesson of the Advent season (especially on Christmas Eve) is to read the proposal of Gabriel as if the angel of the LORD were speaking to you. At that point, you have to become the virgin Mary and say, “Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word.”

—————————————

[1] The Roman calendar was similar to the Hebrew calendar as the year began in March (month 1) and ended in February (month 12).  Those aligned with the Vernal Equinox and were lunar based.  Spring begins with the Hebrew month Nissan, and Winter ends with the Hebrew month Adar.  The months September (7th month), October (8th month), November (9th month) and December (10th month) are named based on their place in a year’s twelve divisions.  These align with the Hebrew months Tishri (7), Cheshvan (8), Kislev (9), and Tevet (10).

John 1:1-18 – The Birth of the Word [First Sunday after Christmas]

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being. What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.

There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came as a witness to testify to the light, so that all might believe through him. He himself was not the light, but he came to testify to the light. The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world.

He was in the world, and the world came into being through him; yet the world did not know him. He came to what was his own, and his own people did not accept him. But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God, who were born, not of blood or of the will of the flesh or of the will of man, but of God.

And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his glory, the glory as of a father’s only son, full of grace and truth. (John testified to him and cried out, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me ranks ahead of me because he was before me.’”) From his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace. The law indeed was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has ever seen God. It is God the only Son, who is close to the Father’s heart, who has made him known.

—————————————————————————————————–

This is the Gospel selection for the First (and Only) Sunday after Christmas, Year B 2017. In will next be read aloud in church by a priest on Sunday, December 31, 2017. It is important because John applies the symbolism of Logos to Jesus Christ.

As the lone Sunday of Christmas, between Advent and Epiphany, this Gospel reading represents Christmas – a summation of the twelve days thereof: the Gifts of God to the world. In this regard, it should be noted that John 1:1-14 is the third selection (Christmas III) as the Gospel reading for Christmas Day (or Christmas Eve) services; so it is recognized by the Church as relative to the birth of Christ. This makes it parallel the Luke 2 options (Christmas I and Christmas II, as variations of verses 1-20: the Shepherds and the Angels). Because Matthew 2:1-12 (the wise men and Herod) is read as an Epiphany lesson (all years), realizing that story occurred after the nativity of Jesus, this reading from John 1 has to be seen as a witness to the birth of Jesus, like that of the shepherds’ visit to the manger. This can be seen in the statement of verse 14: “And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his glory.”

Still, the importance of the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem is not why we traditionally read the Luke 2 reading; and it is not the reason we read this rather enigmatic reading from John 1 in the Christmas season. Think about it. Who else in history is known for having done something historically significant on the day of their birth, such that part of the world wants to focus on the infancy of that great person, more than the great person’s achievements? No one, Jesus included, as that representation of God being born in human form was not realized until the ministry of Jesus began, followed by his persecution to death, his resurrection, ascension and return. The birth of baby Jesus marks the historic significance of the adult Jesus.

Big Brain Note: If we did not know the end of the story beforehand, the beginning of the story would have no meaning.

In the third Sunday of Advent, the Gospel reading was also from the first chapter of John. In that reading part of this reading is duplicated: “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came as a witness to testify to the light, so that all might believe through him. He himself was not the light, but he came to testify to the light.” Those words come from verses 6, 7, and 8. Because the author names “John” there, verses 19-28 are read with those on Advent 3, which are clearly about John the Baptizer.

This reading is not about John the Baptizer, thus (as I proposed in my article for Advent 3) the naming of “John” here is important as being the conditions foretold by John the Baptizer about the Messiah. The separation by parentheses is to denote an example given by the Baptist, as to how to recognize the Messiah. The name “John” has meaning above and beyond the limits of one John, as the meaning behind that name can be seen as directing one to see Jesus Christ as “Yah(weh) Is Gracious) through His Son. John the author does not use that specific identification (“Jesus Christ”) until verse 17 (next to last in this reading), when he wrote, “grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.”

By seeing this reading as a reference to the Christ (the Messiah promised to the Jews) and his birth in human form, John 1:1-18 becomes an esoteric comparison to the literal story told in Luke 2. The visitation of the angel and the heavenly host is comparable to John writing about the “Word” as the heavenly “light” to be in the “life” of “people.”

The shepherds then became “witnesses to testify to the light.” When they reached the newborn, “the Word became flesh and lived among us.” Both Gospel author wrote of Jesus coming into the world, only differently. Still, the continued importance of the “birth of Christ” is when Christ is born anew in Christians. That is how the Word of God continues to be “sent by God.”

This makes “Logos” important to understand. That repeated word of importance appears three times in verse 1, and a fourth time in verse 14. Like the name “Iōannēs” (which is any Biblical entity named “John” or all named to signify “Yah Is Gracious”), the capitalized word “Logos” cannot be limited to only one translation: “Word.” This is because “logos” can also translate as “ground, plea, opinion, expectation, word, speech, account, reason, proportion, discourse, and plan.” As such, verse 1 can be seen as intending the reader grasp this depth of scope, rather than simply repeat the ambiguity of “Word.” One example would be: “In the beginning was the Expectation, and the Reason was with God, and the Plan was God.”

Certainly, Jesus was part of God’s original Idea, from the beginning to his presence on earth, and throughout his many returns in Saints and Apostles. Without the man Jesus as our guide to God, humanity remains lost. Still, Jesus did not come to promote himself over God. It is wrong to read John’s first verse and mentally translate “the Word” as Jesus Christ, because the physical reality that became Jesus Christ was “a Thought” of God. Just as God’s Plan was to bring Jesus Christ to mankind, His Reason was to transform a world of believers into duplications of His Son, all born with the same Expectation through the Christ Mind.

God cannot be limited to only producing one Jesus Christ, although the one Jesus Christ can never be replaced.

Christians (by title) are replications of Christ, which is the Mind connected to God the Father. When one’s heart has married God, then the offspring is a new “Jesus,” via the same Christ Mind, with the link between Spiritual and physical being the Holy Spirit. Jesus represents the joining of the Father to the Son, via the Holy Spirit – as a Trinity on earth.  Therefore all Saints are Apostles and Prophets of the LORD, in total commitment to serving God … just as Jesus was conceived to be and born to make that service possible in others.

This means the birth of Jesus Christ is not a one-time scene on earth, away in a manger in Bethlehem. The Christmas story is retold year after year because it represents the rebirth of Jesus Christ in Christians … true Christians who have become Saintly and righteous … in the name of Jesus Christ.

Just as the Angel appeared before shepherds to announce the Messiah had come, the shepherds became the first Saints by experiencing baby Jesus before them. They were filled with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Likewise, John is appearing before us in writing, telling us of the heavenly grace that has come into the world. It is now up to each reader to decide to run and see the baby.

Christians do that by searching the words of the Holy Bible, looking for the “hidden manger” that holds the Messiah of the world. If one acts to seek the light and the life, the grace and the truth, then the whispers of God’s heavenly messengers will lead you to open your heart and receive the Spirit of the LORD. One must love God with all his or her heart and all his or her mind to become married to Him. Total subservience bring the promise of great reward.  Then the truth will be so wonderful that one can never go back to serving self. One is reborn then as a new Jesus Christ.

I recommend a deeper view of John 1:1-18. The translation above is conversational English, not Spiritual Greek. I have offered some insights here; but be advised my words expand 300+ words of God into 3,300+ words of explanation. Even at that depth, much is still missed. Each reader must be able to see beyond what John wrote, and beyond what I have written. One needs the insight of the Christ Mind to grasp the wholeness of meaning.

Then one must have a strong desire to share that meaning with others … leading newcomers to their own personal experience.