Tag Archives: Palm Sunday

Mark 14:1-15:47 – From Lent to a New View of Holy Week

Rather than list almost two complete chapters from the Gospel of Mark, I recommend going to this site and reading that account of the Passion Play.

Instead of a lengthy Gospel reading, please take the time to read this lengthy explanation of what the Passion Play says, which becomes most relative to the following Holy Week.

Palm Sunday is the last day of Lent.  The celebration of Jesus entering Jerusalem is the antithesis of Mardi Gras (Fat Tuesday), with no parades, sugary cakes, or complimentary beads are passed out.  Rather than revelry prior to a difficult test, it should after the successful conclusion and the end of testing that one cheers one’s graduation to the next level of achievement.  To turn this day of happiness and celebration into a day of sorrowful focus on a most necessary death is the wrong view to take, remembering how Jesus said, “unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds.” (John 12:24).  This is why the symbol of Christianity is not the crucifix (a symbol of punishment), but the Trinity of the spiritual intersecting with the physical (+).  Death is the bane of mortality; but one has gone through Lent to be prepared for a Resurrection to eternal life.  Celebrate that victory!

—————————————————————————————-

This is the main Gospel selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for the Sunday of the Passion: Palm Sunday, Year B. It will next be read aloud in church by a combination of parishioners, a reader, and a priest, as a reenactment of the final two weeks of Jesus’ ministry, depicting his final entrance into Jerusalem, his final Seder meal with his disciples, his arrest, presentation before rulers, his trial, sentence, punishment, death, and entombment. It is important as these remembrances of Peter, through Mark, become the source of Eucharistic rites and the points of recognition that highlight the reverence of “Holy Week,” the lead-in to Easter and the risen Lord.

According to my Word program’s word count, the reading from Mark is over 2,400 words (making it as long, if not longer than one of my interpretations of much shorter readings). Whenever holy days call for readings of such length and audience involvement the priest is basically given the day off, with no sermon preached. The logic is, “I will let the reading speak for itself. Let us sit and bask in the glory of those words recited.”

And the atheists Beatles asked, “All the lonely people, where do they all belong?” Due to a lack of bodies present in this picture, it looks like the people thought they belonged some place other than church.

Involving a congregation (often with begging, pleading, and threats) makes for a great theatrical presentation, but the people should seek to know the meaning of the words; and that is what a priest is called by the Holy Spirit to provide. Anyone who has a tee time scheduled after church (or a football game to watch, etc.), or has not planned on spending extra time listening to holy words being explained on Holy Days, with no plans for spending all Sunday in church, that one needs to cease coming to a building that allows the pretense of Christianity.

Whenever twenty four hundred words of God are spoken (the Year C reading from Luke is only 2,242 words, and the Year A reading from Matthew is just under 2,700 words), true Christians should thirst for deeper understanding … not just bask in the uncertainty that is known to be present, which demands a true priest explain God’s intent.  As Holy Week follows the Passion Sunday reading, it would make more sense to divide this lengthy reading into seven readings, with deeper explanation of meaning able to be given each day of a Holy Week.  Because this is not done, the readings theatrically presented one day a year, without explanation (in-depth sermon), are always left up to the ignorant to discern, with ignorance begetting ignorance.

The degraded state of American church worship has created many congregations that are easily bored with “religious talk.”  Therefore, I will forego any attempt to spend a week’s time writing about all the meaning that can be found in this reading from Mark.

One’s easy answer to the literal is equally a horror. Take away all idiots who have no time for understanding and the Holy Bible expands for inquiring minds, well beyond the capabilities of the literal.

Instead, here I will address the element that has been the Catholic-Anglican production of a Holy Week, which come from elements found in Mark (and the other Gospels that tell similar accounts). These will be shown to support the six days of special recognition, leading to Easter Sunday.

Let me first state that it is my opinion that Holy Week is a fabrication of the Church of Rome, as a way to mimic the Passover week-long festival, while erasing all Jewish influence that could be associated with the resurrection of Jesus Christ. That would be well and fine IF (big IF) Jesus had told one of his Gospel writers, “Hey! Make sure you let it be known that I have come with a New Covenant, which means my followers two thousand years from now will need to toss out all remembrance of the festivals my daddy (God) told Moses to make sure the Israelites must recognize forevermore. Instead of Passover, let’s call that Easter and make sure bunnies, colorful eggs and yellow marshmallow chickens are part of that new festival in my honor.”

Unfortunately for many, Jesus did not say those words.  Instead, he said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” (Matthew 5:17)

Hint: The Law being fulfilled by Jesus would include Christians recognizing Passover, of which God sent his Son to be a memorable part of.  I recommend everyone read Exodus 12, with Jesus kept in mind, as a parallel event.

Get the picture and see yourself needing to paint the blood of Jesus Christ over your body, so you can avoid the mortality death sentence. That blood represents YOUR PASSOVER through Christ, so reincarnation does not get your soul.

The erasure of the permanence of God telling Moses, “This is a day [the Passover day of blood] you are to commemorate; for the generations to come you shall celebrate it as a festival to the LORD–a lasting ordinance” (Exodus 12:14) means Christians (for the most part) know absolutely nothing about the true Holy Week that is the eight days of Passover. Most years the Jews recognize the Passover at different times than do Christians recognize Easter, when both should observe the one and the same event. Since the Roman Church made up a calendar that differs from the Hebrew calendar (not lunar-based), they artificially created a nebulous time of recognition, which only rarely aligns with the Jewish timing.

Let me add that this new tradition created by the Church centuries ago means there are dedicated priests whose faith leads them to have great belief in that tradition, as being truly holy, so their dedication is sincere. The sincerity of faith priests devote to the resurrection of Jesus on the first day of the week, following the end of the Passover festival, is a model by which Christians should match. Still, the attendance for Palm Sunday services pales in comparison to attendance for Easter Sunday services; and attendance for the Monday through Saturday services in between are sparse, at best. Thus, the faith of priests is not fully passed onto the people, which is due to an inability to explain the obvious questions that arise over Jewish Passover and Christian Easter.

Some churches like to show their non-hatred of Jews by inviting Jewish rabbis to come speak to a congregation about the Passover Seder meal.  Because most churches do not incorporate the two religions regularly, only on special occasions like Passover-Easter, few Christians know anything about the Seder ritual or Jewish traditions.  Even when a visit by a Jewish representative makes that awareness made, only Christian Jews would be able to explain the Passover in terms of Jesus being the God-sent Messiah to the Jews.  Standard Jews would only talk about Moses and their privilege as God’s chosen people, which is why Christians do not make the same observances as do Jews.

This is why it is important to realize that Jesus of Nazareth, born of a woman in Bethlehem, was a Jew, one who said, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.” (Matthew 15:24) The Jews were those who were lost to Babylon; but the scattered descendants of the Northern Kingdom (Israel), including the Samaritans, had become assimilated into foreign nations and cultures, earning them the distinction by true Jews as being people of “Gentile” heritage.

To be found is to be a TRUE Christian. That can be either Jew of Gentile.

As such, Christians of the Gentile nations of Europe (and the extended places the imperialism of those nations sent sheep to get lost) are therefore spiritual descendants of the lost sheep of Israel. They have become so lost they do not know why they believe in the King of the Jews, the Son of Man who called God his Father … born a Jew … but they respond to his call. Therefore, it is important to look at the Passover festival as the true root of Holy Week, so more lost sheep can hear the voice of truth calling them by name.

To first look at the element of Palm Sunday, it was John who wrote of Mary Magdalene anointing Jesus’ feet with nard, stating that event took place “six days before the Passover” (John 12:1).  Since the Passover that year began on the Sabbath, six days before the Sabbath is Sunday (the first day of the week). However, when one realizes the Hebrew days begin at 6:00 PM, such that the Passover Seder meal (Jesus’ “Last Supper”) took place on technical Sabbath (our Friday evening), six days prior to that was the feast given in honor of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead.  Because that dinner took place in the evening, it was on an actual Sabbath eve, when 6:00 PM made it technical Sunday.

Thus, when John wrote, “On the next day” (John 12:12a) Jesus entered Jerusalem to a cheering crowd and street lined with palm branches, that “next day” was actual Sunday, following technical Sunday.  This is why Palm Sunday is right to be called that.

In Mark’s Gospel, it seems the timing of the anointing with nard is confusing, because Mark 14:1 states, “It was two days before the Passover and the festival of Unleavened Bread.” That timing says when the “chief priests and the scribes were looking for a way to arrest Jesus by stealth and kill him.”  This means the two days timing factor was not when the anointing took place. We can deduce that by Mark then recounting the event that drove Judas Iscariot over the edge, so that he would betray Jesus and become an asset for the Temple in their plot.  Mark was then recalling an event that occurred earlier in time … six days before the Passover.

John wrote after that celebration dinner for Jesus and Lazarus, “the chief priests planned to put Lazarus to death also; because on account of him many of the Jews were going away and were believing in Jesus.” (John 12:10-11) That states the nebulosity of their plot, such that it had not been finalized prior to Jesus entering Jerusalem (Palm Sunday), but Judas Iscariot helped them go with their plot to arrest and kill Jesus, by his going to them.  Judas then made that commitment to betray Jesu on Wednesday or Thursday, “two days before the Passover.”

Look then at how the Temple authorities acted towards Jesus in comparison to how Pharaoh acted towards Moses “two days before the Passover.” The Passover in Egypt was the spilling of blood from sacrificial lambs (young and without blemish), whose blood was then painted over the doorways of the Israelite homes, so the angel of death would spare them. The meat of the lambs was then eaten inside the marked homes, as directed by God, through Moses [preparation, cooking, and wholly consumed].

After a series of plagues upon Egypt, the dinner on the eve of the angel of death passing over was probably a little sparse on taste. … thus bitter herbs and unleavened bread were all that was available to them for seven days. That symbolizes how the fruits of the earth were no longer pleasing to those who would serve God.

Following the deaths that occurred, which saved the Israelite firstborn, the bondage of Egypt was broken, beginning a trek of fifty days. Passover then begins a count towards that number [“Pentecost” means “fiftieth day”], which should be part of any Christian Holy Week, because God commanded that count be made.  In that number of days, they were in the wilderness without the comforts of natural food and water sources for forty days, between day eleven and day fifty.  That is the symbolism of Lent leading one to Palm Sunday (40 days) AND the time Jesus spent teaching his disciples after he was risen (40 days).

Jesus, being like Moses, was going to lead the Israelites (Jews and pilgrim scattered) from the bondage that the Temple forced upon them, to a similar freedom for their souls. Whereas Moses came down with the First Testament after fifty days, Jesus came down from his Ascension on Pentecost, bringing the New Covenant when the Holy Spirit made eleven disciples become reproductions of Jesus, as the Christ Mind was in them. However, before that realization of Christ being reborn could occur, Jesus had to become the sacrificial lamb (Paschal Lamb), whose blood would be spread around each individual (to avoid the death that mortal existence brings); and forty days represents the time Christians have to digest everything written that is the body of prophecy about Jesus Christ foretold, with no scraps leftover when the sunrises within one.

That parallel of Jesus leading Jews to God, just as Moses led Israelites the same way, is the reason why observing the Passover Seder meal, by Christians, is most important.  Every Passover Seder meal forevermore will symbolize Jesus Christ and the New Covenant, through  remembrance of the body and blood that saved their souls for eternal life.  Just as Israelites had to leave the comforts of Egypt for the hardships of the wilderness, so too do Christians have to sacrifice their worldly comforts to serve God.

Because Christians (in particular those of Anglican and Protestant descent) do not have a grasp of the symbolisms practiced in the Passover Seder meal, going to lengths to project it as Jesus’ Last Supper (see Leonardo DaVinci’s famous picture that captures European dining habits, not Jewish).  Calling it a supper makes it seem to be an ordinary meal.  As such, Christians do not fully understand the “bread” is unleavened matzah.

The Seder ritual calls for three matzah squares be placed on a central plate, from which the middle matzah is broken into two pieces … by the father of a family, who presides over the ritual meal.  The Passover is not an official requirement that is led by a rabbi, done in a synagogue.  This is what Jesus did in the upstairs room, as noted when Mark wrote, “While they were eating, he took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to them, and said, “Take; this is my body.”’ (Mark 14:22)

Some priests break the wafer and then raise the two halves high, held together. No priest hides half for the children to find later.

The Greek word written that translates as “bread” is “arton.” According to Thayer’s Greek Lexicon, “arton” is primarily referenced as meaning this:

1. food composed of flour mixed with water and baked; the Israelites made it in the form of an oblong or round cake, as thick as one’s thumb, and as large as a plate or platter; hence, it was not cut, but broken.

The website My Jewish Learning has posted this about how much matzah one is supposed to eat:

“During the seder, one makes two different blessings over the matzah. The first blessing is hamotzi (“…who brings forth bread from the earth”), which is recited whenever one eats bread, and which is obligatory at any festival meal. The second blessing recalls the particular obligation to eat matzah (“…who has sanctified us with the commandments and commanded us concerning the eating of matzah”).”

You will notice that Mark made reference to a very standard element of the Jewish Seder ritual, when he matter of fact stated: “Took the bread, blessed it, and broke it.” Prior to that, one washes one’s hand, and after the breaking of the middle matzah, the largest piece is hidden, as a teaching game to keep the children’s interest.

The hidden half of a matzah is later to be eaten as dessert (called  afikoman). That symbolism is Jesus Christ, who is broken away and hidden, causing the devoted to seek his reward.  Finding Jesus Christ is the sweet dessert that comes after sacrificing one’s self ego to allow Christ to lead one’s mind.

Likewise, the washing of hands ritual, which occurs several times during the Seder ritual, was modified by Jesus as the act of washing feet (which Mark did not write about).  Jesus said to Peter, who rejected his feet being washed (not a recognized ritual), “What I do you do not realize now, but you will understand hereafter.”  The feet symbolize the hidden sins that are only known by God, just as washing hands before eating symbolizes not taking in anything unclean.  What only an Apostle can understand if no sins are overlooked by God, so all must be washed clean before entrance into eternal life with God can occur.

Simply from reading the Last Supper accounts of Matthew and Mark, one can easily get the impression that Jesus stood, blessed and broke bread, passed it out and then raised a toast with wine, all at the same time. That is not the case, as there are four ceremonial glasses of wine consumed during the Seder ritual, drank in an orderly and purposeful manner. Therefore, when Mark immediately followed verse 22 with, “Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, and all of them drank from it. He said to them, “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many,”’ (Mark 14:23-24) it can seem like it took place shortly in time. However, thirty minutes to an hour could have elapsed in between the two – matzah followed by wine.

Each of the four cups of wine has a specific symbolic meaning and name. Jesus raised the third cup, such that he was the Redeemer that Christians must remember.

Mark then wrote, “When they had sung the hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives.”  That reference to a hymn meant an ending psalm in a lengthy “after dinner” ritual of singing. Many songs are sung in the Songs of the Nirtzah, with songs sung before the meal as well as after. The singing of songs can last for a couple of hours, with this accompanied by freely drinking more wine. Many Jewish children say their first experience of being drunk was from being allowed to drink wine during the Seder ritual (parents do not condone this, but aunts and uncles look the other way).

Thus, Mark’s reference was to it being late in the evening, after much drinking and singing, when Jesus led his disciples to the Mount of Olives. That exit officially ended the Passover Seder meal (first version, as the next evening the same ritual is repeated), and Mark writing, “He came and found them sleeping” (Mark 14:27a) means Jewish adult males drink themselves into sleep on that evening. The disciples were asleep because they were drunk and it was late at night (around 1:00 AM.).

That ended the eve that began the Holy Week of Passover. There were still eight days before the festival would end (Sabbath to Sabbath). However, as an aside, I will point out that when Mark wrote (and he is the only one who wrote this), “A certain young man was following him, wearing nothing but a linen cloth,” (Mark 14:51) it was improper for a Jewish male to name a woman or child in writing (unless a significant woman, such as Mary the mother or Mary Magdalene).  It was proper to generally identify such people.

That reference to “A certain young man” means Mark (via Simon-Peter) knew who that someone was (“certain”), yet he was too “young” to name. The same lack of naming can be seen in the feeding of five thousand, where a “boy” was referenced, who had five loaves and two fish.  The “boy” was not just someone passing by, it was a known (“certain”) “boy” who was holding the lunch for Jesus and the gang.  Thus, it was communal property, not that of the boy holding the basket.

John, my beloved son, watch what can be done with our meager lunch when we share it with others.

Both that “boy” and this “young man” referenced by Mark was John the Beloved, the child who reclined his head in Jesus’ lap and asked, “Lord, who is it?” (John 13:25b) John also wrote four chapters (John 14, 15, 16 & 17) about what Jesus taught after the Seder meal, as the child present who was eager to learn, while the adults were busy singing and getting drunk, thus not paying close attention, as was “young” John. Mark did, however, remember John was still awake, but in night clothes, as he tagged along with the adults to Gethsemane; and John was termed “a certain young man” who ran after his close relative, when Jesus was taken away, under arrest.

As the Passover Seder began on the technical Sabbath (after 6:00 PM on actual Friday), Jesus was arrested and held prisoner by the Temple Priests on the night of the Sabbath. By sunrise on the actual Sabbath, Peter had already denied knowing Jesus three times … before the cock’s crow (which is a watch that ends at 3:00 AM, followed by the Morning watch between 3:00 AM and 6:00 AM).

When Mark wrote, “As soon as it was morning, the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council,” it is worthwhile seeing this as the morning of Sunday, the first day of the week, and not the Sabbath. Keep in mind the chief priests, Pharisees and other elders had previously condemned Jesus for healing and doing miracles on the Sabbath.  That alone would state how they could not do the work of processing a prisoner on the Sabbath. Sending a prisoner they want condemned to death to the Roman governor would be clearly against their own laws if done then AND with it being the beginning of the Passover festival, there would be plenty of witnesses that would see them breaking the law that limited work on a Saturday, had they done that. Therefore, day one of this Holy Passover Week is like Rejection Saturday, when Judas turned Jesus in with a kiss, Peter denied him three times to strangers, and the high priest spit on him.

A Sad Sabbath? Not when it is one’s own ego that is denied.

Sunday, the first day of the week, is when the “whole council” would meet to discuss Jesus’s death by Roman decree. This means Pilate would see Jesus and question him then; but Pilate would get no response from Jesus. While Mark does not write of this, Pilate ordered Jesus be sent to Herod Antipas (who was in Jerusalem for the Passover festival), because Jesus was from Nazareth of Galilee (Herod’s area of rule). Therefore, with Sunday finished, Jesus would not be moved to Herod’s palace, until Monday. This makes the second day of Holy Passover Week be Silent Jesus Sunday.

Shhhhh. Don’t tell anyone the old you needs to be saved and returned, when you already know changes are best.

Once one has reached the second day of Holy Passover Week, one must begin counting the number of days in will take for Jesus to come down from his Ascension with the New Covenant – THE HOLY SPIRIT. That would take place in fifty days, just exactly the same as Moses came down from the mountain with the First Covenant after so much time. Keep in mind that none of these comparisons are happenstance or haphazardly took place, by chance. God commanded the timing of the events of Moses, and God commanded the timing of the events of Jesus. If you cannot believe that, then you are not yet ready to be a Christian.

The Jews do what is called “the Counting of the Omer,” where an “omer” is a dry measure, which acts as an amount of grains harvested from the first fruits of spring. That omer of first fruits would be placed in the Temple on the second day of the Passover festival. When the count reaches “Pentecost” (the fiftieth day), then the holiday known as Shavuot (a two day festival) takes place. Pentecost is the first day of Shavuot, with “Shavuot” meaning “Weeks.” There are seven weeks between the second day of Passover and Pentecost. This timing is then attached to Silent Jesus Sunday, making it be the First Day of the Jesus Return Counting.

Monday, Jesus would have waited his turn to see Herod Antipas, just a small person in a line with all the dignitaries and the others who sought his judgment or decree, as Herod Antipas was an important man during his time on earth. Regardless of how important Jesus is to Christians today, he was seen as a lowly Jew. He was the king of a couple of Roman provinces, Galilee being one.  Because it was the leaders from the Temple of Jerusalem who argued against Jesus, and with Jesus not being a legally wanted man in Galilee, Antipas ordered Jesus back to Pilate for judgment. This would have taken up all Monday, with Tuesday being the big day Pilate had scheduled to free a criminal for festival time. This makes the third day of Holy Passover Week be You’re Not My Problem Monday. This is then the Second Day of the Jesus Return Counting.

Break no laws and I’ll serve you no sentences.

Tuesday is the big day. It makes the fourth day that Jesus appeared before important people. This is not to be overlooked, as Jesus was the Paschal Lamb that had to be inspected for four days and be found without blemish. No one told the truth about Jesus being a blasphemer to the chief priest, and Pilate saw no crime, and Herod did not either. Still, once back before Pilate and the crowd cheering for Barabbas to be freed and Jesus crucified, Pilate washed his hands of the mess and ordered Jesus flogged that evening, and crucified the next day. On Tuesday his jailers mocked Jesus with a crown of thorns, a purple robe, and spit upon his face as they called him King of the Jews. Jesus laid in that jail, beaten by a whip, until Wednesday morning. This makes the fourth day of Holy Passover Week be Flog an Innocent Son of Man Tuesday. This is then the Third Day of the Jesus Return Counting.

Only you know the troubles you have caused. Repentance does not come by others whipping the sin out of you.

By the time Wednesday morning came around (it begins at 6:00 AM), Jesus was too beaten to carry his cross from the jail to the place of execution.  This symbolism says that Jesus never asked his disciples to carry their own crosses to their own executions, when he said, “Take up your cross and follow me” (Matthew 16:24; Mark 8:34; Luke 9:23). That was a reference to raising one’s state of existence and becoming a reproduction of Jesus Christ.  A beaten Jesus struggling to carry a heavy crucifix of death had no bearing on his having lived a most pious life.

It was then with help (a pilgrim in Jerusalem for the Passover – Simon from Cyrene, Libya) that Jesus and his cross reached the Place of the Skull (Golgotha).  The cross was able to be in position, in time for him to be crucified (a raised cross) by 9:00 AM. For three hours Jesus was taunted and ridiculed by Pharisees, chief priests and scribes, as those were the Jews who hated Jesus. Meanwhile, Jesus’ family gathered and followed him the whole way, to mourn this punishment until the end. At noon the sun stopped giving its light, which was not a natural phenomenon such as an eclipse. At 3:00 PM on Wednesday Jesus physically died. This makes the fifth day of Holy Passover Week be Death of Jesus Wednesday. This is then the Fourth Day of the Jesus Return Counting.

Death of the body is only the end of that which imprisons a soul.

Now, I have no idea why a Seder meal ritual of handwashing, which Jesus adjusted to be a symbolic foot-washing at his last Seder officiation; but it had nothing to do with a Thursday.  It is laughable (in my mind) to name a day in Holy Passover Week Maundy Thursday, as Thursday was when the dead body of Jesus had hung suspended on a cross, publicly for twenty-four hours. The only indirect mention of Thursday was when Mark wrote, “When evening had come, and since it was the day of Preparation … Joseph of Arimathea … went boldly to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus.” Because it was evening, it makes sense that the spear pierced into the side of Jesus took place on Friday morning. However, the order might have been given on technical Friday, which is actual Thursday after 6:00 PM. This makes the sixth day of Holy Passover Week be Jesus Dead on the Cross One Full Day Thursday. This is then the Fifth Day of the Jesus Return Counting.

Having a full day (24 hours) for everyone to see just how small one is makes day two become representative of when one totally commits to serve God through death (repentance) or resolves to get revenge if given another shot at life (reincarnation).

Friday is called by the Jews “the day of preparation.” This is because there can be no work done on a Sabbath, so all cooking for the Sabbath is done on Friday (before 6:00 PM). Pause for a moment and think about the significant that Jesus’ dead body was prepared for burial on the day of preparation, so Jesus would be ready to rise on the day of the LORD. After the guard pierced Jesus’ side (rather than break his legs to hasten suffocation, if he had still been alive) and reported the confirmation of death to Pilate, then his body was taken down.  It was then moved to an appropriate place for washing and wrapping with his rabbinical prayer shawl (provided by family), a shroud to wrap the body (the shroud of Turin), and a face linen. By 3:00 PM on Friday, Jesus would have been dead for two full days; and at 3:00 PM is about when his body was placed in the tomb. This makes the seventh day of Holy Passover Week be Two Full Days Dead Jesus Entombed Friday. This is then the Sixth Day of the Jesus Return Counting.

Baptism from repentance is followed by baptism for reception by God, which comes before baptism of the Holy Spirit. It is a Trinity of baptisms.

In the traditional Church, there is recognition of Saturday (the Sabbath) before Easter Sunday.  This recognition is known as the day of the Easter (or Paschal) Vigil. This element of a “vigil,” which means “an overnight watch,” is more than the women of Jesus going early Sunday morning to further dress the body with nard and possibly other adornments of ritual, knowing that Jesus was only temporarily placed in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea. The element of a vigil is a Jewish custom, keeping in mind the Temple authorities and the Roman guards kept a vigil overnight on technical Saturday, but were frightened away by angels and the stone being rolled away (Saturday while it was still night).  Of this, Matthew wrote, “The guards shook for fear of him [Jesus appearing from the tomb bright and white as snow] and became like dead men.” (Matthew 28:4)

The Jewish word “shemira” means “watching” or “guarding.” The word becomes a noun when someone is employed as a shemira (males and females have gender modified variations of this word).  A shemira is typically someone Jewish who is paid to stay with a deceased body from death to burial, rather than a close family member volunteering to stay awake with the deceased’ body overnight, at a time when funeral planning must be done.

A male shemira is a Shomin.

This night watch is for three days, which is why Jesus foretelling he would be dead for three days was significant. The belief was based on knowledge that some dead people had come back to life, when thought dead, needing assistance when that happened.  Because of this having happened, and not wanting to entomb a body that might return to life naturally, a watcher was made part of the necessary funeral process. Still, as we read with Lazarus, the heat of the Middle East caused his body to begin decomposing, which brought about the stench of death. Less than three days “dead” meant a body that was possibly comatose, showing no sign of life but not dead, could awaken and make sounds for assistance. However, it was a belief that after three days no soul could come back into a dead body and return it to life (Lazarus was a true miracle, and that was why the chief priests plotted his death too).

As such, someone from Jesus’ family stayed near his body on the cross Wednesday night and Thursday night, as a vigil. On Friday night, when in the tomb, the Temple paid a shemira, who stayed with a Roman guard, in case a thief came to steal the body.

Now, if you have been keeping up with the timing of Holy Passover Week, Jesus was dead a full three days at 3:00 PM on the Sabbath, while in the tomb. The guard and shemira would not have to be there until 6:00 PM, but due to limits on walking distances on a Sabbath the shemira might have waited until 6:00 PM to leave home.  The change to technical Sunday would have allowed him to walk any distance, however far away the tomb was from that home. Jesus could have been removed by angels before the watchers arrived, during the day of the Sabbath. However, Matthew indicated the guards confessed sleeping while on watch, as they only woke up when the women made a commotion and they saw the tomb opened and were questioned: “Where have you taken him?”

This means the eighth day of Holy Passover Week must be called Our Lord is Risen on the Day of the LORD Saturday. This is then the Seventh Day of the Jesus Return Counting.

Knowing God has called one His bride is a great awakening within.

Note: It is not insignificant that Jesus rose on the seventh day, which (besides being the Sabbath day – Seventh day) means the day God deemed holy.  It is a day of rest, so one can contemplate God and His marvelous powers.  Therefore, it is a day when the devoted spend time alone with the Father … as Jesus did inside the tomb.  Plus, Jesus had time to neatly fold his shroud and face linen, as he talked with the Father.

It is important to realize that God planned for His Son to be offered up as the Paschal Lamb on a Sabbath and God planned for His Son’s soul to rise after three days dead on a Sabbath. With the day that soul rose again in the same flesh being on a Saturday AND the counting of Weeks being seven (one week passed), then one can see how seven Sabbaths later, on the eve of Pentecost, God planned for His Son to Ascend to his throne, next to God’s, on a Sabbath. On Pentecost (which then was on a Sunday, fifty days after Jesus was realized risen), Jesus Christ returned (his Spirit as the Christ) in eleven disciples, transforming them into Apostles, beginning the onset and spread of Christianity, from Judaic customs and commitments.  They then realized the return of Christ, as Jesus risen within them … Jesus Returned.

When you love explaining holy words, you have been given the gift of the Holy Spirit to speak in the tongue of the LORD. You begin Prophesying the truth when that resurrection comes.

It is important to see the forty days that the risen Lord spent with his followers, teaching them in Spiritual matters, stretched from the tenth day of the Jesus Return Counting, until the 49th day. Sunday, when Jesus first appeared to the women who loved him and relatives on the road to Emmaus, and his disciples in the upstairs room (twice), was the eighth day of the counting to Jesus’ Return. When Jesus appeared in unrecognizable form on the shore of the Sea of Galilee (a dream of John’s), that was on Monday, the ninth day of the Jesus Return Counting. Thus, when one reads in Acts, “To these [Jesus] also presented himself alive after his suffering, by many convincing proofs, appearing to them over a period of forty days and speaking of the things concerning the kingdom of God” (Acts 1:3), those forty days began on Tuesday, the tenth day in the Jesus Return Counting.

Hopefully, this article will become a seed for thought.  Analyze what I have presented.  Demonstrate your devotion by deeply pondering the possibilities, which have not been clearly seen since the lost sheep of Israel ceased relying on ritual training.  I firmly believe what I have written, but each Christian must be able to see what I see for him or herself.  Feel free to comment or ask questions.  Again, the Passion Play is largely left up to movie directors to interpret, since priests like to let the words speak for themselves, without explanation.  Each Christian must be in touch with the real meaning of this holy week of Passover.

Mark 11:1-11 – Understanding Bethphage, a donkey colt, and palm branches

When they were approaching Jerusalem, at Bethphage and Bethany, near the Mount of Olives, Jesus sent two of his disciples and said to them, “Go into the village ahead of you, and immediately as you enter it, you will find tied there a colt that has never been ridden; untie it and bring it. If anyone says to you, ‘Why are you doing this?’ just say this, ‘The Lord needs it and will send it back here immediately.’” They went away and found a colt tied near a door, outside in the street. As they were untying it, some of the bystanders said to them, “What are you doing, untying the colt?” They told them what Jesus had said; and they allowed them to take it. Then they brought the colt to Jesus and threw their cloaks on it; and he sat on it. Many people spread their cloaks on the road, and others spread leafy branches that they had cut in the fields. Then those who went ahead and those who followed were shouting,

“Hosanna!

Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord!

Blessed is the coming kingdom of our ancestor David!

Hosanna in the highest heaven!”

Then he entered Jerusalem and went into the temple; and when he had looked around at everything, as it was already late, he went out to Bethany with the twelve.

——————–

This is the outdoor [usually] reading selection [considered Track 1] for Palm Sunday [also called Passion Sunday], Year B, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. This is the only time in the lectionary cycle that this selection will be read aloud. As a reading where the congregation gathers outside the nave, this is considered to be the Liturgy of the Palms.

It marks the triumphal entrance of Jesus into Jerusalem, riding a donkey colt, arriving for his final Passover. Because this outside reading is partnered with the usual indoor readings [Old Testament, Psalm, Epistle and Gospel], with the Gospel reading being a quite lengthy reading from Mark’s Gospel [either his chapters 14 & 15, or just chapter 15], so much will be presented of Scripture to the congregation, nothing of merit will be preached. With the Episcopal Church the organization that appreciates short sermons, most priests will simply say little more than, “I’ll let the emotion speak for itself.”

This attitude [biting off much more than one is willing to chew on … in 15 minutes] makes the theatrics of Palm Sunday become a major attraction for church members who rarely attend other services during the church year [Easter and Christmas being other times when people flood into the churches]. Perhaps, the lack of a sermon makes it easier for some to sit through this service. Therefore, for those who seriously seek education and guidance from a church, I feel it becomes important to understand what is divinely stated in this reading; otherwise, people will blindly believe that God wants dried palm branches to symbolize His Son in the flesh.

Because this reading is never deeply discussed, I myself have just now [as I prepared to write this] realized that the place named “Bethphage” is only listed three times in all the Holy Bible (according to Strong’s). The three are all relative to the same story told here in Mark 11, found in Matthew 21, and in Luke 19. In addition to that, when looking up a map to depict the locations of this reading and the others (done previously), I had seen notations that the place known as Bethphage was not clearly known. The map noted Bethphage as “possible site.” Now, as I look things up, I am led to have a better understanding of what is written.

I added some insight to the map I found.

The word “Bethphage” is actually two words in Jewish Palestinian Aramaic, which mean “House of Unripe figs” [“Bēth Paggē”]. (Wikipedia) This says to me now that “Bethphage” was not a town by that name, but a “house” that was located in Bethany. It was there that fruitful fig trees were numerous, possible even a fig farm, so to speak.

One of the things I have been led to realize about divine Scripture is it is perfection and cannot be changed by human brains. This means the order of the words is essential to read as ways to find deeper insight. In the order found here in Mark 11: Jerusalem is listed first, as the place the group would go to, for the Passover; Then, Jesus drew near to Bethphage; and third, The place Bethany is named. This order is telling a story that leaps over time and is not simply one instance.

With three Gospels telling of Bethphage, John’s Gospel is the only one not making this mention. In two of the three Gospels (Matthew and Mark), this story begins the chapter that follows that which tells of Jesus having stayed the night in Jericho, healing blind beggars. In Luke’s Gospel the same order exists, with chapter 19 beginning with Jesus meeting Zacchaeus in Jericho and then, while staying at his house overnight, Jesus told the parable of the ten minas. After that, Luke wrote of the triumphal entrance.

John, on the other hand tells of Jesus having been told of Lazarus’ illness, while he was on the other side of the Jordan, where he waited two days before going to Jericho, then spending the night there. John is the only Gospel writer who tells of Jesus going to Bethany and healing Lazarus, after he had been dead four days. John tells of the triumphal entrance [the Track 2 choice, instead of this reading from Mark 11], but begins his twelfth chapter telling: “six days before the Passover, came Jesus to Bethany,” where his feet were anointed by Mary Magdalene. John then wrote of a plot to kill Lazarus, before he wrote of the entrance into Jerusalem. All of this order adds depth to the whole of four Gospels, when they are dovetailed together as one history.

The Greek text of Mark 11 begins with this order of wording:

Kai hote engizousin eis Hierosolyma , eis Bēthphagē kai Bēthanian ,

In this, there are two segments of words, denoted by the presence of one comma mark. Beginning the first segment is the capitalized word “Kai,” which denotes major importance is made in the following words. That shines importance on the statement that says, “when they drew near to Jerusalem.” In that, the third person plural [“they”] refers to the whole group of disciples and followers of Jesus, all having come from the other side of the Jordan.

Following that important statement is then a comma mark that pauses that approach to Jerusalem, such that they had neared as far as “Bethphage.” This says Bethphage is a place of rest, before actually going into Jerusalem. It is here that another “kai” is found [lower-case], which then makes the important announcement that clarifies “Bethphage” as being in “Bethany,” as a “House” [“Beth”] there, known for its figs.

The importance of Bethany (from “kai“) can then be seen as where Jesus stayed without his disciples. The segment of words that say, “into Bethphage and Bethany” says “they” [the third person plural of the group from the other side of the Jordan] divided up, “into” two separate places, with both (importantly from “kai“) being in Bethany. The use of “kai” then speaks as a divine indication that Jesus stayed in Bethany at the house of Mary, Martha and Lazarus, while the other disciples and followers stayed on the fig orchard on another side of town.

This not only explains how no one but John wrote about the most remarkable miracle of Jesus raising Lazarus from death, but it also adds a clue that is relative to the Passover timing. While the news of Lazarus having died and been raised by Jesus certainly would have reached the group staying at the fig farm, God did not have anyone but John recall this miracle, because he was the only eyewitness to that event. As the only eyewitness to that astounding miracle says two things: 1.) Jesus’ disciples did not go with him to Bethany, where Mary, Martha, and Lazarus had a home; and, 2.) John was not a disciple of Jesus and had not been with Jesus on the other side of the Jordan, instead living with Mary, Martha, and Lazarus.

As far as Bethphage being a word that states importantly (through capitalization) “House of Unripe Figs,” that name for a place would become perfect symbolism for all the followers of Jesus, who at that point in time were the fruit of his vine, who were still in need of maturing to turn into good fruit. This name then says the group separated from Jesus and stayed at a place known for unripe fruit, which was metaphor for their spiritual state of being at that time.

This then also becomes an important statement (due to capitalization) that Bethphage was known for delivering to the Temple the first fruits of figs for the Passover, an omer amount [dry weight] picked in an unripe state. This gathering of unripe fruit would then sit in the Temple, along with other first fruits [including grains], which would be blessed on Shavuot, after a counting of fifty days [the meaning of Pentecost]. The first day of that counting takes place on the second day of the Passover festival [16 Nisan]. This symbolism says the disciples and other followers were the first fruits of Jesus, who would be delivered to the temple as unripe figs with his arrest, who would ripen as Apostles on Pentecost Sunday.

In the map that I have modified, one can see the Jericho road as tracking from Bethany due west, until it reaches the Mount of Olives and then tracks north. The place thought to be a possible location of Bethphage is then not the House of Unripe Figs, but the “village” Jesus sent two disciples to, so they could get a donkey colt that would be found tied up. By sending two disciples there, this says Jesus and the rest of his group went a different route. The only possible place for a village to be [with only two roads out of town] is then the one mistakenly thought to be Bethphage. That acts to confirm this theory, in my mind.

When Jesus told two of his disciples to go and untie a donkey colt that has never before been ridden, one can assume [just as when he told them to go prepare an upper room] that Jesus had a larger network of associates than just his disciples, followers and family. I believe Jesus was an Essene and other Essenes in and around Jerusalem, Judea and Galilee knew Jesus and discretely communicated with him, through messenger or by Jesus meeting with them, with nothing ever recorded and placed in a divine text of those meetings. As such [just like with an available upstairs room], Jesus and others were aware of what was soon to happen and prepared for that event, just as Jesus told them to be prepared.

In the written word of Mark, Jesus prepared his disciples to say, if asked why they were taking a donkey colt, the words “Hoti Ho Kyrios autou chreian echei,” or “Because This Lord has need of it.” While the voice of the spoken word does not denote capitalization by sound, “Because This Lord” is written as important via capitalization. The capitalization in text then explains how those words were designated signal words of preparation. It means Jesus told them precisely what to say if asked why they were taking a colt they did not own; so, “Because This Lord” becomes secret code that allows acceptance of what was taking place.

It says, with the capitalization of “Ho” (typically the article “the”), Jesus instructed them to say slowly, “Because … This … Lord,” where emphasis is placed on themselves (“This”) being “the Lord” in body, and in need of the colt, which would be returned. This becomes comparable to Jesus sending his disciples out into ministry [internship] with specific words to say [“Peace to this house” or “Has come near the kingdom of God”]. This means the two disciples spoke as “This Lord,” not just some stranger walking up.

By seeing how the map shows two routes merging at Gethsemane that would be the prearranged meet up point. That would be where the two disciples with a donkey colt joined to become one whole group again. This becomes symbolism that the entrance of Jesus into Jerusalem as a prophesied savior would begin at the same place that Jesus would be returned to Jerusalem as the sacrificial lamb that would become the truth of the savior prophesied. Jesus had prepared to enter Jerusalem just as the prophet Zechariah had foretold:

“Rejoice greatly, O daughter Zion! Shout aloud, O daughter Jerusalem! Lo, your king comes to you; triumphant and victorious is he, humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.” (Zechariah 9:9)

By riding on a donkey colt that had never been ridden before, Jesus was demonstrating how weak the rulers of Jerusalem were. They had no power over the Romans, just as the Judah of Zechariah had no way to defeat the Babylonians, who could not defeat the Persians. It means Jesus riding upon a donkey colt, parading before the leaders who overlooked from the Temple of Jerusalem, Jesus mimicked the weakness of the leaders of the Jews [those in the flesh]. As a dismal display of weakness, Jesus (in the flesh) was riding a donkey colt with no battle experience, with him wearing no armor. Still, the gall of doing that meant Jesus was more powerful than anything the Temple rulers could ever be.

This then fulfils the insult of Zechariah, who was divinely inspired to write:

“As for you also, because of the blood of my covenant with you, I will set your prisoners free from the waterless pit. Return to your stronghold, O prisoners of hope; today I declare that I will restore to you double.” (Zechariah 9:10-11)

That says the rulers of Jerusalem were justified to rule only by being blood relations to Yahweh’s ex-wife Israel. Following divorce from Yahweh [and subsequent losses of their lands], Jerusalem had become a cistern without any waters of emotion for Yahweh, as seen in the returning Jews fighting over control of a city and people related by blood. The Jews had become “prisoners of hope,” which was the prophecy of a coming Messiah. The hope was a warrior prince with magical abilities. However, that hope was dashed when the prophesied Messiah was said to be fulfilled by a single man riding a young donkey colt, without armor, nothing like the images their hopes relied upon.

The promise to “restore to you double” becomes metaphor for a double share of spirit [Elisha asking Elijah], where the king would be Yahweh, married to the souls of the hopeful. That tells the truth about the Messiah. He was prophesied to come in the frailty that is human flesh, while also being a prophecy that the Messiah can only return in the frailty of your human flesh [individually], after God marries one’s soul. The return will not be a one-to-one exchange [a lost David for a new David-like king] but a one-for-many exchange [one temple of stone for many temples of flesh].

To get the full scope of this picture of Jesus sitting atop a small donkey colt, never before forced to hold up the weight of an adult human male, Jesus is probably riding side-saddle too (so to speak), because he is wearing the robes of a rabbi (kinda like wearing a dress). That effeminate appearance is clearly designed to display the insult intended by Yahweh speaking through his prophet Zechariah, fully known by Jesus. Additionally, Jerusalem was filled with early-arriving Jews, so there were many outside the walls of Jerusalem, along the road overlooking the Kidron Valley. They would have all be educated to memorize Zechariah’s song, so they all burst out laughing at this miserable sight coming before their eyes. None of them [for the most part] had a clue who Jesus was; but one look at him meant sarcastic humor was readily being mimicked in real life, as if Don Quixote would suddenly appear to those having read Man of La Mancha.

While every Jew in Jerusalem that saw that scene knew the meaning of that prophecy, all had mostly given up hope of a Messiah ever truly coming to free them from their prison of emotionless Judaism, much less the domination of one world power after another who had taken over the land once known as Israel. The zealots of Judaism’s frustration created attempts that always ended up being paper warriors pretending to fight for Israel’s land back. All those “Messiahs” only found themselves charging figments of their imagination. All were as disgraced as was this image of Jesus on a small animal that was placed before them. Therefore, as a joke they began singing praises for their new king having finally arrived, after such a long wait.

This is where the symbolism of branches placed upon the road must be understood properly. They were laid before the donkey colt’s path, with Jesus also being fanned by them, like he was indeed a king. He was shaded by them, so he would not get too hot in the sun. All this mockery is missed by modern Christians, those never taught one iota about Judaism.

Where Mark wrote, “Many people spread their cloaks on the road, and others spread leafy branches that they had cut in the fields,” Matthew wrote, “A very large crowd spread their cloaks on the road, and others cut branches from the trees and spread them on the road.” Luke wrote, “As he rode along, people kept spreading their cloaks on the road,” with John writing, “So they took branches of palm trees and went out to meet him.” All are saying the same thing, with three telling of the symbolic act of spreading a cloak before a rider on a horse, and three telling about branches cut from [most likely] date palm trees. Christians ignore the element of cloaks [a statement of laziness] and place great value on dead palms [this reading is called “The Liturgy of the Palms”].

The element of cloaks, spread both on a donkey colt and then the ground before the donkey colt, has to be seen as symbolic of one saying, “I do not want you to get dirty.” In the case of Sir Walter Raleigh spreading his cloak over a mud puddle for Queen Elizabeth I [a myth], it was to keep her royal clothing from becoming soiled [as well as her tootsies in royal shoes]. The same prevention would be to keep Jesus from getting animal hairs or parasites on the beast from getting on him. As for cloaks and branches on the road, those would be to keep the animal from creating a cloud of dust that would dirty Jesus’ feet and robe. Thus, cloaks (and palm leaves to some extent) would keep a king from becoming dirtied, like were the common people. Certainly, none of them saw Jesus as a true king, so the cloaks placed in the dirt were already dirty from a pilgrim having travelled in dust for a day or more.

The symbolism that must be seen from both cloaks and palm branches being used is this: It kept Jesus from coming in contact with the earth. That says the Jewish pilgrims believed their Messiah, promised to them by Yahweh [supposedly their God], would be so holy that he should never be seen as human. Just as Caesar had told everyone he was a god and should be worshipped as such, the Jews were expecting the same kind of deity in a physical body. Simply from that point of view, a palm branch had the same effect as being a way to shield the common people from the glory of God on earth, becoming like the Israelites demanding Moses wear a veil to cover his glowing face, after having met with Yahweh.

A palm branch becomes akin to some form of a fan used by fan dancers, where the nudity of a deity must never be seen, only glimpsed from time to time. That symbolism becomes an admission that says, “Great! Our Messiah has come! Now, I can go back to doing what I was doing before, without worrying any more because our Messiah will do everything for us.” Many a Christian today has this attitude, and many a Christian leader has promoted that lackadaisical view that says, “All I have to do is say I believe. So what if I have never seen anything but palm branches. As long as I think Jesus is behind them, everything is going to be okay.”

As easy as it might be to see that symbolism, the deeper symbolism of Mark writing, “others spread leafy branches that they had cut in the fields” speaks of dead branches. Here, the Greek text actually states, “stibadas kopsantes ek tōn agrōn,” or “branches having been cut down from the fields.” This does not state that the Jewish pilgrims carried knives with them for the purpose of pruning trees. It says the farmers who owned the trees had done the cutting, with dead branches piled along the side of the road as trash, to be burned. The reason the branches would be cut from the field is as Jesus had said: “Whoever does not abide in me is thrown away like a branch and withers; such branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned.” By realizing this, the use of palm branches to set on the path of Jesus says, “Wherever you are going, I am like a dead branch for your mighty donkey colt to walk over, because I certainly will be of no other use to you.”

Finally, skipping past the adulations of the Jewish expectations for a Saint of God [“Blessed in the name of the Lord”], a Saint in the line of David [“Blessed king like David”], the last verse begins by saying, “Kai he entered into Jerusalem , into the temple”.

Jesus entered Jerusalem through the gate of the lower city, the City of David, which had a long series of steps that led up Mount Zion, to the Temple atop Mount Moriah. Jesus entering the City of David would be symbolic that he indeed was of the lineage of David, also born in Bethlehem (although few realized that truth). That is the importance of the capitalized “Kai.” His going into the temple was not just to see if anyone wanted to pick a fight with him [like a pretend warrior prince would do]. It was to drop off the omer of unripe figs that had been gathered. In the temple Jesus placed first fruits of the field in Bethany with all the other first fruits dropped off at the temple. [There might have actually been a precession of Jesus’ disciples, each carrying an omer of unripe figs. This would satisfy the capitalization as an important House of Unripe figs – because so many were offered from that fig farm in Bethany.]

When verse 11 then states, “kai periblepsamenos panta , opse ēdē ousēs tēs horas” or (importantly) “having looked around at everything , late already being the hour,” this says Jesus looked at all the other first fruits offered, as well as looking to see if the vendors were still allowed inside the temple. He would have also inspected the processing of donations made to the treasury and looked at the cleanliness of that holy building. When the comma mark then leaps forward in time, “late” is a statement of it being after the three o’clock hour, therefore in the evening of day. The Jewish evening prayer would be at six, so Jesus probably preferred to pray then on the mount of Olives. Therefore the time would have indicated to Jesus (and the disciples, with other followers) that it was time to return to where they were staying in Bethany. That included those staying at Bethphage.

Because no sermon will ever be preached outside an Episcopal church on Palm Sunday, there is no need to associate this reading with a day that somehow falls in the season of Lent, with Sundays not counting, so it is of no consequence worth discussing. The travesty of Palm Sunday is it promotes worship of a system that refuses to become reborn as Jesus, with the Christ Mind being the result of marriage of one’s soul to Yahweh. Instead of being a church lead by individuals who have experienced that rebirth and know the joy in their souls to be servants of God, seeking the lost and showing them how to be found [the original reality of “Christianity”], all churches of Christianity now pander to raking in the cash and handing out trinkets that act as if they have the right to promise any soul other than their own is saved. Christianity has become the Temple and its Sanhedrin, all seeking to kill Jesus, because he is bad for business.

The act of handing out palm branches on Palm Sunday says, as presented here in Mark: refuse to commit to God, because you think He is too aloof to ever be close to. The act of saving those palm “used” branches, to be burned [as a normal act done to trash, not a holy act of sacrifice – see Cain for that lesson], so the ashes that burning creates can then be smudged on someone’s forehead [along with some oil added] means the church promotes its members walking around marked as dead to God. Handing out dead branches and marking members by the ashes of burnt rubbish, all symbols of someone who bears no fruit, is a bad sign

If it were children pretending to be priests, simply because they went to church and liked the activities of children’s church, without having a clue why the adults go to church, all the ignorance of children could be smiled upon. “Look at them playing church. Isn’t that sweet and cute!” However, to see adults taking the same ignorance of children and promoting it as the meaning of a religion is absurd and an insult to Yahweh.

It is in that vein of ignorance that this reading from Mark [et al] has to be read: as an insult back to organized religion [Judaic then, all Judeo-Christian today]. An insult was prophesied because God did not send a little-g god in the flesh to be some external king that all can spread cloaks and palm branches out to keep him away. God sent His Son to show all humanity how important it is to become another Son of Yahweh [regardless of one’s human gender].

Note:

I wrote this in another article about this Palm Sunday liturgy and it is necessary to grasp that no tree (no plant that produces fruit) only produces green (unripe) fruit. All fruit is initially unripe; but, given time, it will not only ripen and be the tastiest it can be, it will rot if not eaten, falling off the tree to the ground where seeds will take root. Thus, Bethphage – the House of Unripe Figs – is a statement about gathering green, unripe figs. It is impossible for a fig farm to only produce green figs that never ripen.

Isaiah 50:4-9a – The liturgy of adonai Yahweh – God is my lord

The Lord God has given me

the tongue of a teacher,

that I may know how to sustain

the weary with a word.

Morning by morning he wakens–

wakens my ear

to listen as those who are taught.

The Lord God has opened my ear,

and I was not rebellious,

I did not turn backward.

I gave my back to those who struck me,

and my cheeks to those who pulled out the beard;

I did not hide my face

from insult and spitting.

The Lord God helps me;

therefore I have not been disgraced;

therefore I have set my face like flint,

and I know that I shall not be put to shame;

he who vindicates me is near.

Who will contend with me?

Let us stand up together.

Who are my adversaries?

Let them confront me.

It is the Lord God who helps me;

who will declare me guilty?

——————–

This is the Old Testament selection for the indoor service on Palm Sunday, Year B, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. With an outdoor service held first, when palm leaves are passed out to all in attendance (called the Liturgy of the Palm), the congregation is then solemnly led inside, where the regular service is called Liturgy of the Word. This particular selection from Isaiah will be read in all three years of the lectionary cycle (A,B, and C). Due to the length of the Palm Sunday service [aka Passion Sunday] (outdoor and indoor) means nothing will be said about these words from Isaiah at those times. However, these verses will also be read on two other occasions in the church calendar, with it being possible they will be then be explained in a sermon. the best chance for that happening will be during the Ordinary time after Pentecost, Proper 19-B service.

The name of the book this reading comes from is “Isaiah,” but as is the case with religious scholars (it appears), teaching doubt at every turn is best to keep educators employed, always needing someone to teach “church history” and other tricks of dogma. Doubt weakens the faith of seekers. Here, the ones with the larger brains have figured out that this chapter [number 50] falls under the heading “Deutero-Isaiah” The scuttlebutt says Isaiah chapters 40–55 are “the work of an anonymous 6th-century BCE author writing during the Exile.” (Wikipedia) That says, it is the educated guess that should be taken as “gospel” is some prophet [of unknown nomenclature] put his name on a document that preexisted, under the name “Isaiah.” Presumably, he just added more to a book that the real Isaiah had begun.

To move beyond the doubt, where the same source says, “Isaiah was one of the most popular works among Jews in the Second Temple period (c. 515 BCE – 70 CE). In Christian circles, it was held in such high regard as to be called “the Fifth Gospel” (also Wikipedia), I feel the author of all divine Scripture is the same – Yahweh. Because bodies of flesh and bone are temporal and are bound to die, Yahweh uses multiple bodies of His faithful – His prophets – to write His Word.

I also firmly believe that anyone who professes to be a “Christian” must either begin with that belief – God is the author of all within the Holy Bible, thus all are words of truth – or one needs to admit one is not a Christian. If one sees a church as a place to be educated so one can enter ministry, that boat is not longer sailing. Being a prophet like Isaiah [who was trained in the school of prophets, but not well enough to write a book] is no longer a “tag, you’re it” process – the one that made Christianity great. If you think the only way to be a priest for Yahweh is to attend a school offering diplomas, then you put your faith is in scholars, not the One God.

Verse 4 in this reading selection makes a clear statement of one being divinely possessed by Yahweh. The first words that have been translated as “The Lord God” are written in Hebrew as “adonay Yahweh” [no capital letters in Hebrew]. This means “The Lord God” actually states “lord [of me] Yahweh.” [I allow that capitalization.]

The use of “lord” [“adonay”] has to be understood as being a statement about self, where the spiritual self of a body of flesh is the soul. Regardless of external motivations and enticements, the soul is the lord of the body, operating through the human brain. The body does as the soul commands, although the body can become like a crying child, so the soul ends up pampering the body, just to shut it up. This means the word “adonay” alone means a soul as lord over a body.

When the word “adonay leads to “Yahweh,” that then becomes a statement of marriage between Yahweh and a soul in a body of flesh. It is that union that causes the body of flesh’s lord to be Yahweh – His Holy Spirit. Thus, verse 4 is a proclamation that whoever it was going by the name Isaiah [maybe there were several Isaiahs who were prophets?] was filled with the Holy Spirit of Yahweh and led to speak the truth, in Yahweh’s name.

When we read, “given me the tongue of a teacher,” the element of possessing a “gift” of speech is important to realize. Without the presence of Yahweh controlling a body of flesh, then that ability to speak God’s Word would not be possible. That talent is given by one becoming a wife of Yahweh.

The Hebrew word translated as “teacher” is “limmud,” which means “taught.” Of course, we all know that the title “rabbi” means “teacher” [Aramaic “rabbonni”]; but in order to become a “teacher,” one must first be “taught.” Because of possessing the ability to speak [“tongue”] as a “teacher,” that means one has been “given” wisdom, which one received. That is what has been freely given by Yahweh; still, the prophet [Isaiah] was thereby being “taught” while he spoke words that teach others. This verse should then be seen as one foretelling of the “speaking in tongues” that occurred on Pentecost, when disciples became Apostles.

The word “limmund” also implies one is a disciple or student, such that one is “accustomed” to being led to understanding. (Brown-Driver-Briggs) When one enrolls in a school, one expects to go there and willingly accept instructions. The same expectations apply when Yahweh becomes like a school, with only one student in His class.

This then reflects on how an Apostle is not suddenly someone who has learned everything necessary to be learned, in order to go into the business of ministry by oneself. As a priest who presumes to know a lot after graduation from some education institution, the reality of a student of Yahweh is there is a continuation of the learning process. One always remains a disciple, one who has willingly been transformed into a mouthpiece for Yahweh. This means the “tongue” (“lashon”) is not a power coming from an educated brain, but the Word of God coming from the “speech” of a body of flesh, whose “lord” is “Yahweh.” This is why the student Ezekiel answered God’s question, “Can these dry bones live?” by saying, “Lord, you know.”

When verse 4 then continues by stating, “that I may know how to sustain the weary with a word,” this is Yahweh lording over someone named Isaiah – willingly and longingly, through marriage. That says the only reason God speaks through a prophet is so those seeking God’s help can be comforted. Someone who needs assistance, who is weary spiritually, is one who is simply a soul lording over its body of flesh, and going nowhere positive. The weary then cry out in laments to God, so God answers their prayers through His prophets. The prophets are then the messengers who say, “I heard your cry for help.”

Here, it is important to grasp that the educated are not the ones who routinely give comfort to the spiritually weary. If anything, they are the ones who add to the misery, placing blame on their souls for inabilities not to sin anymore. This condition existed after Israel and Judah had been lost, which is when the scholars now are saying this chapter was written after that. They conclude Isaiah 50 (with other chapters) was written after the return from exile in Babylon, back to Jerusalem, inside the new second temple. Thus, the spiritually weary were those misled [already back then] by teachers who did not have Yahweh as their lord.

Then, verse 4 says, “Morning by morning he wakens — wakens my ear to listen as those who are taught.” This mistranslation can give the impression that a prophet of Yahweh wakes up and goes to school to listen to his teachers. The actual Hebrew says, “he awakens my ear to hear as the learned.” This means Yahweh constantly speaks His truth to the disciple wife, so the prophet is always filled with deep faith, trust, and love of that guidance. He [or she] delights in ‘school time’ never ending. Most Episcopalians can barely stand an hour a week being orated to by a priest [which says something about what little is being said too].

At this point, it is worthwhile to realize that verses 5, 7, and 9 all repeat the presence of God, as “adonay Yahweh.” Repetition in divine Scripture is always a signal of a theme that needs to be understood. Thus, it was Isaiah who had once been weary, like so many other Jews [Judeans], but his ear was opened when Yahweh answered his prayers.

Isaiah wrote, “I was not rebellious, I did not turn backward.” This is a statement of wanting to hear the proposal of Yahweh. It says Isaiah heard the call to sacrifice self-control, of his soul over his flesh, and he did not resist that sacrifice. The spiritually weary are often those who rebel and turn their backs on Yahweh, especially if they have made the world their surrogate for Yahweh. Spiritual weariness can be assuaged by material illusions, of power, wealth, and influence over others. People with a lot to sacrifice will quickly rebel.

Because this reading is chosen to accompany the sacrifices Jesus made, at the hand of the Romans, prompted by the Jews of the temple, the words of Isaiah say this abuse is to be expected. The leaders of the second temple likewise did not appreciate prophets telling the educated just how wrong they were. Some things always remain the same. The leaders of the churches today do not like being told they are wrong.

Those words coming from the mouths of the prophets are the voice of God in many bodies of human flesh; but because the educated have never been educated by sacrificing their brains to serve Yahweh, they lash out at the prophet. As Isaiah wrote and as will be read from Mark [Year B], the pretend holy act violently against those speaking as Yahweh: whipping backs, pulling beards, insulting and spitting on them [add purple robes and crowns of thorns]. This mistreatment is to be expected by all wives of Yahweh – those who marry His Holy Spirit and lovingly allow Him to become one’s lord.

Jesus was not the only one. Isaiah was another. There have been many and there [hopefully] will be many more to come. With Yahweh speaking through a prophet’s words, they all become prophetic of Jesus. However, it is the scholars who only see Jesus as the point of Isaiah’s words that are wrong. They mislead from that narrow view of Yahweh. They punish Isaiah further by not giving someone who was married to God the credit of being “the real Isaiah” [a name that means “Yah[weh] Is Salvation]. They spit on that name still to this day, trying to defame him as being “Deutero-Isaiah,” which is akin to calling him a false prophet, someone unknown acting like a prophet.

When Isaiah wrote, “The Lord God helps me,” that says his allowing Yahweh to be the lord of his soul-body was how Isaiah could withstand all the punishment. The same condition within Jesus gave him the same ability to withstand undue punishment. All who make the sacrifice of self in marriage to Yahweh have the same help afforded them, just as did Isaiah and Jesus.

When we then read Isaiah state: “I have not been disgraced; I have set my face like flint, and I shall not be put to shame; he who vindicates me is near,” that says, “no matter how hard one tries to destroy me, my Yahweh is always with me.”

A wife of Yahweh will never be humiliated, because [like the children’s taunt says – “I am rubber, you are glue”] whatever assaults are made on a prophet of Yahweh only damages the soul of the one making the assaults. When a face is set like flint, whoever strikes that face will draw sparks that will set the abuser on fire – the kind eternal hell is made of. No one can shame a wife of Yahweh, because to cast insults and damnations on the saintly brings that shame back upon oneself.

In the questions posed by Isaiah, one must hear the voice of Yahweh speaking:

“Who will contend with me? Let us stand up together.”

“Who are my adversaries? Let them confront me.”

Yahweh is speaking those words, not the prophet himself. It is God Almighty who wants to know who it is that thinks he or she can defeat Yahweh. Those are welcomed to “stand up together” and become wives of Yahweh [Saul did that and changed his name to Paul] or challenge Yahweh himself.

The problem with abusers is they willingly cast stones to kill those who are projections of themselves; but few are willing to use the stone to kill self-ego and submit to the Will of God. A confrontation with Yahweh becomes a desire to know what makes Isaiah tick. In that process of conversation [rather than acts of killing], God will win every heart who hears the truth. The problem there is the educated fear being exposed as idiots, so they avoid direct confrontation [see how the Jews used the Romans to do their dirty work].

This reading ends with Isaiah saying, “It is the Lord God who helps me; who will declare me guilty?” That repeats the theme of “adonay Yahweh” being Yahweh asking all who will be like Isaiah and Jesus and become souls married to Yahweh, a union of soul with Holy Spirit. All who are the wives of Yahweh will receive His blessings. That divine assistance means one’s soul is granted eternal life. Thus, a question of judgment of guilt can only be truthful if one is charged with being holy, sacred, saintly and divinely inspired. Anything short of that simply becomes the judgment of a soul alone projecting one’s own failures onto others, where all true guilt becomes their own burden to bear.

On a day when churches put on pageantry to show the distresses Jesus suffered, at the hands of the unjust, to say nothing about this reading from Isaiah is to act as Jews taking silent delight watching Jesus suffer. A priest who says nothing about the Passion of Jesus [“passion” meaning “suffering”] says one is a soul alone, having no words from Yahweh to share. Imagine how well Pentecost Sunday would have gone, had Peter and the eleven received tongues of fire and then just sat down in some papal chair, letting the events of the previous Passover “speak for themselves.”

Yahweh is a Big Boy. He is much bigger than any educated human brain that has ever been known to mankind. Yahweh knows all and wants to share that knowledge with seekers … those spiritually weary and seeking divine help. The churches of today have become modern models of the Temple of Jerusalem, all fighting against anyone who claims to be the Messiah, always killing the messenger rather than listen. Yet, they demand attention, when one who has never been taught by Yahweh can never teach anything of value about spiritual matters [ask Nicodemus].

The beauty of this message is it does not matter how bad things get, if one has surrendered oneself to Yahweh. Yahweh is big enough to marry every soul in the world and provide loving care for them all. The problem is that open proposal is assaulted and confronted by those who think they have too much to lose if God ever ran the world. They reject the concept of “adonay Yahweh” black-heartedly.

Philippians 2:5-11 – Paul’s song of self-sacrifice

Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus,

who, though he was in the form of God,

did not regard equality with God

as something to be exploited,

but emptied himself,

taking the form of a slave,

being born in human likeness.

And being found in human form,

he humbled himself

and became obedient to the point of death–

even death on a cross.

Therefore God also highly exalted him

and gave him the name

that is above every name,

so that at the name of Jesus

every knee should bend,

in heaven and on earth and under the earth,

and every tongue should confess

that Jesus Christ is Lord,

to the glory of God the Father.

——————–

This is the Epistle selection for reading aloud on Palm Sunday, Year B, according to the lectionary of the Episcopal Church. With an outdoor service held first, when palm leaves are passed out to all in attendance and readings spoken, called the Liturgy of the Palm, the congregation is then solemnly led inside, where the regular service is called Liturgy of the Word. This particular selection from Philippians will be read in all three years of the lectionary cycle (A,B, and C), but due to the length of the Palm Sunday service [aka Passion Sunday] nothing will be said about these words at those times. However, these verses will also be read on two other occasions in the church calendar [neither during a set Sunday service], with it being possible little will ever be said about these verses and less heard.

It becomes important to point out that the letter to the Christians of Philippi is only four chapters in length. In that whole, it is only here in these verses found in chapter 2 that the text changes from prose to song. Just as David wrote psalms and many of the prophets would write lyrics of psalms, all inspired by Yahweh, it is worthwhile to see God’s voice singing from the pen of Paul. This makes this selection a good match for the song presented in Isaiah 50, as well as Psalm 31.

These seven verses begin by singing, “Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus.” The NRSV and the NIV list a heading for these verses [plus the prior four] that says, “Imitating Christ’s Humility.” The NASB has a heading that says, “Be like Christ.” The BibleHub Interlinear heads these specific verses as “The Attitude of Christ,” which they list similar verbiage can be found in Isaiah 52:13-15. All of this “imitating,” being “like” and an “attitude of” says one person – one soul – one spirit – known as “Jesus Christ” – is worthy of mimicry. That is a false message to receive.

All of these ‘titles’ are missing the truth of what Paul was, himself, as a writer of divine Scripture. He was reborn “in the name of Christ Jesus,” such that Paul was a soul married to Yahweh who had become the resurrection of Jesus, because Paul had received the Christ Mind. Paul was not imitation. Paul was not being like Christ; and, Paul had not developed an “attitude” of mimicry. Paul sang as Saul, who had been transformed from a selfish Christian hater into a Son of man, doing exactly as Yahweh guided him to do. Paul then exemplified a continuation of what Jesus had done, as another Jesus reborn.

In this regard, I find it worthwhile to know what the first four verses of this chapter in Paul’s letter to the Christians of Philippi say, keeping in mind that Paul wrote letters of support to others he had come in contact with, those who had been transformed just as he had been. Paul was not promoting Christians pretend being like Jesus, while secretly sinning as they always had done before. Paul wrote his letters so those who had been reborn as Christ, in the name of Jesus, encouraging them to stay in that state of being, never to fall prey to the world’s attacks. Thus, here are the first four verses that lead to this song:

“Therefore if there is any encouragement in Christ, if any consolation of love, if any fellowship of the Spirit, if any affection and compassion, make my joy complete by being of the same mind, maintaining the same love, united in spirit, intent on one purpose. Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility consider one another as more important than yourselves; do not merely look out for your own personal interests, but also for the interests of others.”

In that, Paul began by listing the conditions for being “in Christ” [“en Christō”], where the preposition “en” means one’s soul has entered into Yahweh’s Holy Spirit, so one is “with” the presence of God Almighty. That state of being is called “Christ,” which means being an “Anointed one.” When Paul wrote the word “Christ” alone, that was not him naming the human flesh known as “Jesus.” Paul was writing to true Christians, telling them the conditions (the “if”) for that most divine presence “within,” was realized by becoming God’s “Christ.”

That is then repeated in verse 5, by Paul writing, “Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus” [“en Christō Iēsou”]. By adding “Jesus” [“Iēsou”], after “Christ,” that separate word then identifies all who have been reborn as a “Son of man” [regardless of human gender]. Just as Saul changed his name to Paul [a name that means “Small”], all who become “Anointed ones” bring on the name “Jesus.”

The conditions for being “in Christ” are: love, fellowship of the Spirit, affection and compassion … intent on one purpose. The “fellowship of the Spirit,” where “Spirit” [“Pneumatos”] is capitalized, thus bearing the importance of the “Holy Spirit,” says the “if” is all souls in Philippi have married Yahweh, thereby made “in Christ.” As a collection of true Christians, they would all share a fellowship is translated from “koinōnia,” meaning “sharing in that commonly held.” That held in common was the Holy “Spirit.” The “affection and compassion” is then towards one another, so all stay together “intent on one purpose.” That purpose is to bring other seekers to also be “in Christ.”

The state of being that is “in Christ” is then said to be “selfless,” meaning a soul surrendered in submission to God’s Will [marriage to Yahweh]. By not making this sacrifice, one remains a flawed human being, one which is filled with “empty conceit [“kenodoxian” – “vanity or empty pride”], not filled with God’s Holy Spirit. The unity of Christians [“fellowship”] means never attempting to rise above the others, which was the flaw of the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Temple elite, all of whom had no humility and saw other Jews as beings of lesser material value. They cared nothing for others, meaning the sole intent of Christianity was as a unified presence of God, as His Sons of man [all reproductions of Jesus, not pretenders] for the purpose of saving souls and bringing those souls to join with them, as all “in Christ.”

If one does not know this is why Paul wrote so many letters, then one will not be able to understand much of what Paul wrote. Being “in Christ” becomes like his verse 5 says, “Let the same mind be in you.” That “mind” [“phroneite”] means one must not try to think like Jesus thought, from imaginations of what Jesus must have thought, because thinking is a function of a human brain, which all humans have.

The word translated as “the same mind” means, “to have understanding” and to “judge” (Strong’s), from an “inner perspective (insight) that shows itself in corresponding, outward behavior.” (HELPS Word-studies) This is the Christ Mind and being in possession of that [only possible as a gift of Yahweh to a wife – a soul merged with His Holy Spirit] means one will become “in the name of Jesus,” just as Jesus lived for Yahweh through the Christ [“Anointed”] “mind.”

It is also worthwhile to note the footnote that appears in the NRSV translation online [BibleGateway]. Next to the translation “was” [“that was in Christ”] is a footnote that states, “that you have in Christ.” This, in reality, is focusing on the translation of the Greek word “kai.”

The Greek of verse 5 states, “Touto phroneite en hymin ho kai en ChristōIēsou.” The use of “kai,” as I have pointed out many times before [in other writings] is as a marker word that shows importance to follow. Rather than be translated as a simple conjunction, kai acts to separate a segment of words for emphasis. As such, the literal translation here says, “This [that stated in verses 1-4, the conditions “if”] let mind be in you this kai in Christ Jesus.” Therefore, Paul said let the same mind that makes one Christ Jesus be in you, making you [importantly marked] be “in Christ Jesus” also.

When Paul then sang the words of verse 6, “who, though he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God,” this then becomes a statement that oneself, also “in Christ” as “Jesus” reborn,” not think being Anointed makes one a god on earth. Paul [who never knew Jesus personally] said Jesus not once claimed to be God incarnate. That is a powerful verse to understand.

It is a common misconception for Christian churches today, all denominations, to believe that Jesus was God incarnate. Seeing Jesus as a deity makes Jesus unobtainable by mere human beings. Thinking Jesus of Nazareth bore the name “Jesus Christ,” such that the name “Christ” can only refer to the god Jesus, makes Jesus as lofty as was Julius Caesar, a so-called divine ruler in the flesh. However, Jesus never claimed to be God, as he always said he was a “Son of man.” That recognition is what Paul is pointing out here; so, one reborn as Jesus does not equate to being God incarnate, but only another Son of man, led by the Father.

To expand on that, Paul then sang in verse 7: “but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness.” The exception [“alla” = “but, however”] is then “himself emptied” [as written “heauton ekenōsen”]. When “self” is understood to mean one’s “soul” [lower-p pneuma], then an “emptied soul” means the sacrifice of the soul unto Yahweh. A “self” is then the breath of life that animates human flesh. The aspect of “emptied” means Jesus “deprived himself” or “rendered void himself,” which does not mean Jesus killed his life in the flesh. It means his soul submitted, willingly and lovingly, to Yahweh, as His wife, making his flesh no longer serve the will of the soul [which can become inverted to the flesh controlling the soul – Big Brain Syndrome].

The flesh of Jesus, void of self-ego and self-will, was alive still, but under the control of Yahweh. It was through this self-sacrifice that Yahweh was able to be “born into a human,” making that human become the likeness of God [not God in flesh]. This condition of Jesus is then the condition Yahweh sets for all who will “follow Jesus,” in his name. None will ever be gods on earth; all will serve God totally: with all their hearts, all their souls, and all their minds.

It was this self-sacrifice and servitude that then led Paul to sing in verse 8, “And being found in human form, he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death — even death on a cross.”

This begins with the word “kai,” so it is important that one understands how Yahweh was “found in human form.” It was then that presence within the flesh of Jesus [his soul merged with the Holy Spirit] that forced Jesus to humble himself, meaning Jesus the man was nothing, because Yahweh was everything about his being. That sacrifice of self-will says that Jesus’ submission to the Will of Yahweh led him to be so obedient that he completely died of self – “death” [“thanatou”]. Still, that spiritual death of self-ego would lead to his physical death upon a Roman cross.

In that last statement, about the “cross,” the Greek needs further examination to grasp the full meaning that is intended to come from those words. Paul wrote, “thanatou de staurou,” which can literally translate as “death now a raised stake.” The repeating of the word “death,” with a comma mark in between [“thanatou , thanatou”] means the spiritual death of self [self-will, self-ego, self-importance] was then being explained as not being physical “death,” because the meaning of “death” then took on the meaning of [from “de” meaning, “moreover, indeed now . . . , on top of this . . . , next . .] becoming spiritually “a raised stake” [the common meaning of “staurou”].

A raised stake is what vineyard owners place in the ground for their grapevines, as a strong upright pole that will support vine grown and heavy clusters of grapes hanging from them. The growers make the stakes they post be strong, so the vine will not fall to the ground and produce bad fruit. Jesus’ sacrifice [spiritual death as a Son of man] made him become spiritually a raised stake in the ground [a Son of man]. As such, the good fruit of the vine can come from his ‘blood’ and kept in a state of worthiness, until ripe to be picked.

In verse 9, Paul then sang these words: “Therefore God also highly exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name”. This begins with the capitalized word “Dio,” meaning “wherefore, on which account, therefore” (Strong’s Usage), so the importance is as a connection of this “death now a raised stake.” That state of being is then pointed towards this verse, with “Dio” followed by a comma mark of separation and the word “kai,” denoting that death now a raised stake is importantly “this God him highly exalted.”

The importance that must be gained is “death now a raised stake” means “Yahweh” having been raised, where the spiritual elevation of a soul is due to the presence of God (“Theos”). It is that elevated state of being, brought about by the death of self, that a body of flesh becomes “highly exalted” (“hyperypsōsen”). This means Jesus was a Son of man, because of self-sacrifice unto God.

The second half of this verse is begun with the word “kai,” which says it is important to realize that “Jesus” was “given” to this model of self-sacrifice. Because God had Gabriel tell Mary his Son’s name was to be Jesus, that says it is a God-given name. The meaning of the name “Jesus” says, “Yah[weh] Will Save” or “Yah[weh] Saves.” That becomes “the name that is above every name,” such that whether one’s parents gave one a name like “Tom,” “Dick,” or “Harriett,” those names apply to a soul alone in the flesh, one that has yet to be Saved By Yahweh. As such, once one has become just like was Jesus, so one’s soul has married Yahweh and one has become His Anointed, then one will also assume the name that is above all other names – “Yahweh Saves.”

With this truth stated, Paul then sang in verse 10: “so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, in heaven and on earth and under the earth”. Here, another common mistake is made by churches, who then teach their congregations to worship Jesus Christ, as if “Christ” was the last name of “Jesus.” Preachers teach members of their churches to expect Jesus to come and save them in the “Rapture.” They worship Jesus as a god, which is not what his name states.

The name “Jesus” states that “Yahweh Will Save,” which means the man named Jesus was Saved By Yahweh, not some demigod. Jesus certainly did not save himself, as he was not an equal to God. Therefore, every knee shall bend in worship to Yahweh [not Jesus].

When Paul wrote, “in heaven and on earth and under the earth,” this is the realm of the Universe, which is the Creation of Yahweh. Jesus was not the one who created the Universe. Jesus was the model for all whose knees shall bend to Yahweh – the Creator. Jesus was, from day one, totally committed to serving Yahweh, as his soul was married to God’s Holy Spirit at birth in the flesh.

Finally, in this song of Paul to the Christians in Philippi, his verse 11 sings, “and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” This too begins with the word “kai,” indicating importance in realizing that “every tongue should confess that,” where “that” refers to the previous statement: “every knee should bend” to God the Creator.

In the use of the Greek word “ glossa,” which translates a “tongue,” this becomes a multi-leveled intention, which goes beyond the physical, meaning more than advice to believers that they should profess faith in God. The word expands to mean “language,” such that everyone on earth “should confess” to Yahweh – those of all tongues. That speaks of the spread of Christianity around the globe. Still, on a most divine level, “tongue” means everyone should sacrifice his or her self-will, so each holy wife’s “tongue” will then speak the Word of God.

At this point, it is important to notice the multiple uses of the conditional, which has been translated as what one “should” do. Verses 10 and 11 each tell what one “should” do: “should bow” [“kampsē”] and “should confess” [“exomologēsētai”]. This condition relates back to the beginning, when Paul set up the “ifs” of being “in Christ.” All of this means it is based on the condition of self-surrender to the Will of God.

Yahweh is not going to come demanding someone become His wife. Jesus is not going to fly down from heaven on a white horse, lopping the heads off of people who do not bow down and take his name. Everything becomes the responsibility of the seeker. When one is not seeking salvation from Yahweh, one will not bend a knee to God, nor will one confess surrender of one’s soul to Yahweh.

When verse 11 ends with the presentation as shown above: “Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father,” the reality of what appears in the written text is absolutely missed. The Greek, according to the BibleHub Interlinear presentation, shows all-capital letters spelling out “LORD JESUS CHRIST” [“KYRIOS IĒSOUS CHRISTOS”], followed by a comma mark and the words “eis doxan Theou Patros.” Clearly, for all who have ever been in some Internet chat room, all-caps should be read as yelling or speaking loudly. Capitalization in Scripture means importance. Therefore, all-caps must be understood as most definitely read this as having divine meaning.

Those last words say, “to glory God Father.” In that word “doxan” [“glory”] is intended to read as “the unspoken manifestation of God.” (HELPS Word-studies) By reading that into that word, the repetition of “god” (via implication of meaning) makes “God” (written) be then stated to be the “Father.” By the capitalization of “Patros,” this conclusion to verse 11 says [MOST IMPORTANTLY], all confession of truth can only come when one’s soul has allowed Yahweh to be one’s “LORD.” Upon that transformation does one become reborn as “JESUS.” This is then the model offspring that is allowed one, having become the “ANOINTED ONE.”

It is then from that conditional transformation that one has become “the unspoken manifestation of God,” the Son of man, and the child of Yahweh. From that lineage, one assumes a name that is above whatever one the flesh is known by [for Paul it was Saul]. In that transition to being “in the name of Jesus Christ,” one becomes related by spiritual “blood” to Jesus, another “Son” of the “Father” [regardless of human gender].

This reading from Paul will never be interpreted in a church for seekers to realize. No priest or pastor will stand before a flock of paying customers and tell them about a condition that makes it up to them to choose: sit in a pew and be judged for doing nothing about becoming Jesus reborn [wasting spirit]; or, get up and go some place where Scripture can unfold as deeply meaningful. The former means reject Yahweh, with the later meaning says one is willing to do the necessary work … alone … in order to find a deep spiritual uplifting that will convince one’s soul that one self-sacrifice is the only way to salvation.

I am writing this interpretation as one who has left the pew. I write as one led by the Holy Spirit to assist any readers seeking the truth. I put it out as the tongue of Yahweh having been placed in the world for your benefit.

This reading will be read aloud in Episcopal Churches along with so much else that the vast majority of Episcopalians – priests and lay people alike – will not have any time to ponder the meaning of any of the words heard read aloud. They only have a pittance of time set aside for such things as going to church and pretending to be Christians. Bible study has become something only the elderly attend, if at all. That becomes a reflection of truth, being a statement of selfishness, which Paul warned about in a verse not read aloud today.

Paul wrote in his third verse, “Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility regard others as better than yourselves.” The “selfish ambition” of today’s false Christians have is the pretense of being saved by Jesus. This “conceit” is thinking the quickie way to religion is the best way, making them ridicule other religions that put more time into explaining the meaning of the Word [even if they do so wrongly], because they believe the less said the better [fewer mistakes].

It is this lack of teaching that leads a spiritual movement, begun by Jesus and expanded by Saints reborn in the name of Jesus Christ, to become degraded to the point of being a perfect reflection of what not to be – the system of the Temples of Jerusalem. What Paul wrote is so poorly misunderstood that it appears the only message that got through is “Do nothing.”

Psalm 31:9-16 – Submission of one’s soul to Yahweh

9 Have mercy on me, O Lord, for I am in trouble; *

my eye is consumed with sorrow,

and also my throat and my belly.

10 For my life is wasted with grief,

and my years with sighing; *

my strength fails me because of affliction,

and my bones are consumed.

11 I have become a reproach to all my enemies and even to my neighbors,

a dismay to those of my acquaintance; *

when they see me in the street they avoid me.

12 I am forgotten like a dead man, out of mind; *

I am as useless as a broken pot.

13 For I have heard the whispering of the crowd;

fear is all around; *

they put their heads together against me;

they plot to take my life.

14 But as for me, I have trusted in you, O Lord. *

I have said, “You are my God.

15 My times are in your hand; *

rescue me from the hand of my enemies,

and from those who persecute me.

16 Make your face to shine upon your servant, *

and in your loving-kindness save me.”

——————–

This is the Psalm selection that will be read aloud in unison or sung by a cantor on Passion Sunday, Year B, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. With an outdoor service held first, when palm leaves are passed out to all in attendance, other readings are presented, called the Liturgy of the Palm [thereby “Palm Sunday”]. Afterwards, the congregation is then solemnly led inside, where the regular service is called Liturgy of the Word. This particular selection from David’s songs will be read in indoors, in all three years of the lectionary cycle (A,B, and C); but due to the length of the Palm Sunday service [aka Passion Sunday] nothing will be said about these words at those times. However, these verses will also be presented (partially – two verses) on two other occasions in the church calendar [one a set Sunday service], with it being possible something will be said about verses 15 and 16, but even that is doubtful to leave lasting value.

The NRSV title for this song of David is “Prayer and Praise for Deliverance from Enemies.” The NASB calls it “A Psalm of Complaint and of Praise,” while the BibleHub Interlinear heads it as “Into Your Hands I Commit My Spirit.” When these verses of this psalm are read on Passion Sunday (from the Greek word “paschó,” meaning “to suffer, to be acted upon, to experience ill will”), they become heard as prophetic of Jesus’s arrest, trials, punishment, ridicule, and execution. It is from the fifth verse in the Psalm 31 that Jesus was heard to recite, before he breathed his last breath of life on the cross. (Luke 23:46) Still, this is a song from the heart of David.

To hear this song sung and only think it is prophetic of the punishment that Jesus would go through, thus no longer applicable to anyone else, is wrong. David felt this need to pray for deliverance from enemies, because Israel was land given to the followers of Moses – a promise by God for the marriage between their souls and Yahweh – and the people who had lived on the land of Canaan before (and after) knew nothing of Yahweh; and, they always saw the Israelites as thieves. Thus, David led Israel as a warrior king, one who led his troops out and back in, always doing battle with the enemies that held only hatred for Israelites. Thus, this psalm is written for everyone who has ever lived and who will ever live, because everyone has and will always have enemies; and, successfully dealing with enemies is why souls need to find God and marry Yahweh.

Again, where the translation says “O Lord,” “Yahweh” is written. The name “Yahweh” is written ten times in the Psalm 31, with two of those times found in these parsed verses read aloud. In verse 14, where the second usage of Yahweh is found, David is shown to state, “You are my God.” In reality, what David wrote (thus intended to be understood) is “’ĕ·lō·hay ’āt·tāh,” which literally translates to say, “gods of you.” The word “elohim” (which is plural for “gods,” not “God”) has to be read as a claim that David’s soul (an eternal spirit, like a “god”) was married to Yahweh, thus becoming one of His “elohay.”

To translate it as if David was making some statement of possession, as “You are my God,” this is the opposite meaning intended. Its intent becomes why David prays to Yahweh for help. Rather than be seen as possessing God, so God acts to save the flesh of David (at his beck and call), David knows his flesh is meaningless; it is his soul that begs Yahweh for salvation. Therefore, David would put up with any punishments his enemies could bring upon his body, because his soul was entrusted to Yahweh.

By realizing that error of translation, which is even present in the King James Version (KJV), thereby a longstanding problem for English-speaking Christians, it becomes worthwhile to review all that is translated in this selection. Verse 9 is another that has embellishments that miss the point of what God spoke through the words of David.

The Hebrew written by David in verse 9 states: “ḥān·nê·nî Yah·weh , kî ṣar-lî ‘ā·šə·šāh ḇə·ḵa·‘as ‘ê·nî , nap̄·šî ū·ḇiṭ·nî .” That is divided into three segments that are rooted in “chanan Yahweh , ki sarar ashesh ka’ac ayin , nephesh beten .” Literally those segments state: “show favor on me Yahweh , for bound am I to waste away with anger in my eye , my soul my body .

This becomes a prayer to God for the strength of Yahweh to withstand the constant barrage of anger and wrath that is always before one to see. It admits one’s own mortality, as a confession that a body of flesh will always be in need. The prayer is then for the soul of David to be strengthened, so then can be the body able to withstand punishments, undue or naturally caused. When David is seen as a wife to Yahweh [a “soul,” a “nephesh”], who has trust in Yahweh – and will forever – this statement to “show favor” becomes a known blessing given to all His wives. In that, David becomes a reflection of Jesus, as well as a reflection of all who are born again as a wife of God.

Verse 10 is then translated so the points of focus are the same. It continues this prayer for divine strength, more closely related to the needs for a “body” of flesh [not a womb or belly]. Rather than David’s “life” being “spent with grief or sorrow,” the word “life” is found in the second segment of words. By removing it from the first segment, the statement recognizes the world is a place where grief and sorrow can find need for Yahweh as its husband.

The focus placed on “my life” [the life of David] is then all “the years” of marriage between his soul and God. The concept of “life” can only come from that union, where marriage to Yahweh allows one to escape the death a soul faces from a body limited by mortality. This means the “sighing” present is that sorrow and grief a soul-body is always confronted with in the state of death that is mortality. All “failures” found in human beings are the “iniquities” that come from being unmarried to Yahweh. Thus, human strength, that found in bones and muscles, always wastes away over the years, with age, when the soul is not strengthened by marriage to Yahweh.

In verse 11, David points out how being married to Yahweh makes one an outcast in a world where so many souls stand alone in their bodies of flesh, unable to find the strength of Yahweh to assist them. The use of “enemies” means those who bind one in the world (from the meaning of “tsarar”), which relates to verse 9 saying, “for bound am I.” This makes “enemies” those who entwine a soul-flesh with expectations of worldliness, not righteousness.

By following that with the word “neighbors” [“shaken”], David said he lived among those who were not married to Yahweh. That was not only Gentiles who submitted to the will of Israel, but also included Israelites who followed rules set by Moses, without marriage to Yahweh. The translation of “acquaintances” [“lim·yud·dā·‘āy,” rooted in “yada”] means others will be known not to be true wives of Yahweh (by their deeds), causing them to run away (an act of a cowardly enemy). They flee a responsibility of commitment to Yahweh, so their actions are not those of a friend and neighbor, not as another of Yahweh’s wives.

In verse 12, David should be heard as Yahweh speaking through his body, as the first person singular “I” having been “forgotten.” For the Israelites to have forgotten the God of their forefathers, that was a present time recall of David. It was his fathers [the elders of Israel] who went to Samuel and demanded a king, to be like other nations. They had forgotten that Yahweh was their King, their Lord.

This forgetfulness then means their “minds” [“mil·lêḇ,” meaning their “inner man, mind, will, heart”] had lost divine insight and guidance, having become solely dependent on the size of their brains. David certainly was not useless and neither was Yahweh; but to those Israelites who were working against being wives of Yahweh, Yahweh was a useless to them as a broken clay pot. Likewise, Yahweh was discarded by many, just as a broken clay pot was tossed into a heap of waste.

In verse 13, David again is speaking the words of Yahweh as the first person singular “I.” The “whispering heard [from “dibbah,” which means “whispering, defamation, evil report”], God hears all minds and all talk, being omniscient. David could then become knowing of those secret plans as a king with aides who reported the scuttlebutt to him.

When “fear” is about, that becomes a signal that many have not accepted the proposal of Yahweh to be married with their souls. Without His presence, the world becomes a place that readily generates fears. Here, again, the element of “life” means a soul granted eternal life, due to a divine merger with His Holy Spirit. Therefore, the plots and schemes are to weaken the aspect of religious education, fearing its call for commitment. That plot would be so others would soon forget all about the delivery of land and protection coming with the promise [marriage vows] of complete servitude, as a holy wife.

With this train of thought realized, it is then that verse 14 proclaims David to be such a wife, one that is thoroughly devoted to serving Yahweh. The “trust” [“batach”] put in Yahweh goes well beyond belief, as “trust” comes from personal experience. It is meant as a statement of true faith. That trust comes from marriage and the experience of the Holy Spirit leading one’s body of flesh, so it only serves God. Therefore, David says he (like all like him) is one of Yahweh’s “elohim,” or souls granted eternal life from servitude in a body of flesh.

Verse 15 then follows this statement of commitment to Yahweh by David singing, “My times are in your hand.” Here, the Hebrew begins with one word – “bə·yā·ḏə·ḵā” – where the root importance is laser focused on “in your hand” [rooted in “yad,” or “hand”]. David sings out that everything about his being – soul-flesh – is in the hands of Yahweh. It is then that power of God that gives David the ability to withstand the “times” when his enemies come down on him. It is that “hand” of God that delivers David’s soul and body the strength to overcome any and all persecutions his enemies can ever bring to him.

Finally, in verse 16, David sings praisingly about having lowered his face in submission to Yahweh, by “Let[ing] your face shine upon your servant.” This is a confirmation of the First Commandment, where one must not wear one’s own face before Yahweh, as that acts as if oneself is a “god,” equal to God. Those who love Yahweh and seek to marry Him will never try to act as equals to Him, by showing one’s face [or any number of other faces of gods] before His. David was married to Yahweh, thereby he wore the face of Yahweh to the world. That means the soul of David had achieved the comfort of knowing salvation was his [“hō·wō·šî·‘ê·nî” as “I am saved” or I have been delivered”].

As a psalm sung aloud on Passion Sunday [the Liturgy of the Word, not the Palm] and easily attributed to Jesus and the enemies that had brought him pain and suffering, the lack of focus on educating the seekers about the deeper meaning become an example of what David’s song sang. If this message from God being in David’s heart goes without explanation, it cannot be applied to all who seek to become wives of Yahweh. As some misguided extension of the forty days of Lent, where somehow Sundays do not count, making Lent extend all the way to “Holy Saturday” [six days from Passion Sunday], the message of marriage to Yahweh is foregone through ignorance.

Jesus was able to withstand the sufferings, read aloud about his suffering, because he was one with Yahweh’s Holy Spirit. David was equally filled with that divine husband, as were all the Apostles. To listen to these selected verses of David and then simply be left go, sent home to let them sink into some subconscious state, simmering under a plethora of other words, all telling of injustice and human enemies of the flesh, means our ‘teachers’ [rabbis, priests, pastors, ministers, etc.] never allow their flocks to be fed the truth. Yahweh expects all seekers to submit their selves to Him and become His servants. Without that alliance of marriage, then one’s soul is only filled with fears brought on by a world of sin.

Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29 – Singing praise as a living temple whose cornerstone is the Holy Spirit

1 Give thanks to the Lord, for he is good; *

his mercy endures for ever.

2 Let Israel now proclaim, *

“His mercy endures for ever.”

19 Open for me the gates of righteousness; *

I will enter them;

I will offer thanks to the Lord.

20 “This is the gate of the Lord; *

he who is righteous may enter.”

21 I will give thanks to you, for you answered me *

and have become my salvation.

22 The same stone which the builders rejected *

has become the chief cornerstone.

23 This is the Lord’s doing, *

and it is marvelous in our eyes.

24 On this day the Lord has acted; *

we will rejoice and be glad in it.

25 Hosannah, Lord, hosannah! *

Lord, send us now success.

26 Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord; *

we bless you from the house of the Lord.

27 God is the Lord; he has shined upon us; *

form a procession with branches up to the horns of the altar.

28 “You are my God, and I will thank you; *

you are my God, and I will exalt you.”

29 Give thanks to the Lord, for he is good; *

his mercy endures for ever.

——————–

This is the Psalm selection that will be read aloud in unison or sung by a cantor on Palm Sunday, Year B, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. The same psalm of praise will be scheduled for presentation in Years A and C. Each year the Liturgy of the Palm will include a Gospel reading that tells of Jesus’ “Triumphal Entrance into Jerusalem” [Mark 11:1-11 and Matthew 21:1-11]. All will be performed in an outdoor service that is held first, when palm leaves are passed out to all in attendance, this and another reading are presented, called the Liturgy of the Palm [thereby “Palm Sunday”]. Afterwards, the congregation is then solemnly led inside, where the regular service is called Liturgy of the Word [thereby “Passion Sunday”]. This particular selection from David’s songs will be read in all three years of the lectionary cycle (A,B, and C), but due to the length of the Palm Sunday service [aka Passion Sunday] nothing will be said about these words at those times. However, these verses will also be presented on two other occasions in the church calendar (partially on Easter Sunday [A,B, and C] and entirely, with additional verses on Easter 2-C), with it being possible something will be said about the meaning of these verses from David’s Psalm 118.

In this collection of verses, the translations of “Lord” are written as “Yahweh,” ten times. In verse 28, twice is translated “my God.” The first of these is written “el,” and the second is written “elohay.” Neither of those, nor the appearance of “God” in verse 27 [“God is the Lord”], where “el” is again written, should be capitalized. Capitalization is only allowed for words of divinely elevated meaning, as Hebrew has no capital letters in it usage. Still, the repetition of “Yahweh” has to be known and recognized as the specific God to whom David sang praise.

Because these parsed verses begin with verses 19 and 20 using the word “gate” and “gates,” this seems to be an appropriate choice to partner with the story of Jesus’ triumphal entrance into Jerusalem. He entered Jerusalem’s City of David, at the gate known as Zion, with Mount Zion being the hill [the steps formed upon that hill] he climbed to get to the Temple of Jerusalem, atop Mount Moriah. That Temple of stone and mortar did not include the cornerstone that had the name “Jesus” inscribed on it. Thus, this is another song of David that is easily heard as a prophecy of Jesus; but it is God speaking through David, because David was devoted to Yahweh, like Jesus, which means these words are prophetic for all who become Spiritually born as a Son of man.

Because verses 1 and 2 can be seen simply as David expressing his faith in Yahweh, from having surrendered his self-ego to serve God completely, these verses must apply to all who will be able to truthfully sing these words of praise. It can only be from that surrender of self to Yahweh that Yahweh is good and that goodness endures forever. That speaks of having received the gift of eternal life to one’s soul. Only a soul can know Yahweh. Therefore, when David sang to all Israel, verses 1 and 2 speak to all who proclaim belief in Yahweh as their Lord and Master. One must submit in that way for receipt of God’s Holy Spirit, through a marriage to one’s soul, in order to know God personally.

In verse 19 it is most important to see the “gates of righteousness” [“ša·‘ă·rê-ṣe·ḏeq,” from “shaar tsedeq”] are metaphor for the opening of one’s soul to receive the Holy Spirit. The “gates” are then reflections of all the inhibitions of a physical world, where the body has become the fortress in which the soul is imprisoned. In Jerusalem, all gates are entrances within high and imposing walls of defense from attack. The gates were opened at sunrise and closed at sunset, and always manned with guards. This is a projection of the way a human body of flesh defends against the unwanted; but for most sinners, Yahweh is unwanted, thereby the gates are closed to His presence. God will never force His Will to smash down any gates of resistance. It is up to one to lower one’s guard, as a bride must do for her husband to enter her body.

The thanks given to Yahweh represents praise to His presence. That becomes the willing receipt of the Holy Spirit and the birth of a righteous way of being. Because Jesus is the model of righteousness, the Holy Spirit’s penetration into one’s body, upon willing submission by marriage, means David became like Jesus [a name that means “Yah Will Save]. After that birth of righteousness, the gates of one’s body will forevermore refuse entrance of sin. The body of flesh becomes a fortress of righteousness, which is the freedom granted a soul, from a prison representing a body of flesh, so one wholly is granted eternal life. Verse 21 then sings of this salvation [“lî·šū·‘āh” or “yeshuah”].

When it is recognized how verse 22 sings, “The stone that the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone,” that cornerstone is eternal life, which comes from salvation. The Hebrew word for “salvation” is (in essence) the name “Yeshuah,” which translates into a name as “Joshua” or “Jesus.” The main building block for one’s body to become a temple unto Yahweh is righteousness. Righteousness can only come from the presence of the Holy Spirit; and, the Holy Spirit can only become the ruler over a body of flesh through willing sacrifice of the soul to Yahweh.

When David then sang, “This is the Lord’s doing; it is marvelous in our eyes,” that says no soul-body alone can transform one’s temple of flesh into a palace of righteousness. All the beautifications Herod the Great began to remodel the Second Temple, meaning decades of hard physical labor, was all thrown down in a sudden act of violence. That speaks against human will-power being enough to will oneself to resist sins of the flesh. Only the presence of Yahweh can bring about “marvelous” [from “nip̄·lāṯ,” from “pala,” meaning “to be surpassing or extraordinary”] acts of self to behold. The eyes of self cannot believe its own acts of body; and, the eyes of others find it miraculous that the human being they knew before has now been so remarkably transformed.

When David then followed that verse by singing, “This is the day that the Lord has made; let us rejoice and be glad in it,” that “day” is the Sabbath day, which was made holy. It is also the “day” when one’s soul was forever transformed through a spiritual marriage of one’s soul to Yahweh. It is as one’s wedding day. It is also when the “daylight” of truth entered into one’s being, never to leave. That “day” is when the rejoicing of a freed soul becomes glad it sacrificed self to God, a day never forgotten.

In verse 25, confusion can come from thinking the presence of Yahweh will bring about wealth, influence and power over others. The translation that says, “Hosannah, Lord, hosannah! Lord, send us now success,” actually states the power of prayer overtaking one’s body and soul. “Hosannah” means “I pray.” One prays as Yahweh allowing one to freely talk to Him. The meaning of “send us now” is separated by comma mark from “success.” That becomes a prayer to God to be sent out to do His Will. Therefore, the successes prayed for are to find other lost souls and deliver them a marriage proposal, just like the one they said “Yes” to. Successes are measured by souls saved, not by material gains received from prayers.

Verse 26 is then a most popular verse for Christians to sing aloud. It says, “Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord. We bless you from the house of the Lord.” Verses 25 and 26 become those sung by the people along the road Jesus travelled into Jerusalem. While they sang those praises in mockery, as disbelief in the words’ meanings, David sang them as a statement of truth about all who are filled with God’s Holy Spirit and made righteous. Those wives will truly be “blessed,” having taken on His Holy name [which would later be known to be “Jesus”], as a “Son” of the Father [regardless of human gender]. The “house of Yahweh” is one’s body of flesh, which God’s Holy Spirit then controls fully.

Verse 27 begins by saying, “el Yahweh,” which is more than the translation “The Lord is God” states. The word ‘el” means a little-g “god,” which is one’s soul. Because a soul is eternal and never dies, it is godlike, as a god. David was then saying “My soul is Yahweh’s” or “Yahweh owns my soul.” That is important to grasp, when David then added, “he has given us light.” The “light” given [from “or”] is the truth that leads one to a life of righteousness.

This then had David sing the words that are vital to know, relative to a Palm Sunday outdoor psalm being sung: “Bind the festal procession with branches, up to the horns of the altar.”

The word “festal” comes from the Hebrew “chag,” which is a “festival gathering, feast, pilgrim feast,” one where “sacrifice” has been made to Yahweh. This means the sacrifice is the sacrifice of living “branches,” not cut date palm leaves [where no Hebrew is written that states “branches”]. The Israelites were those who Yahweh had commanded recognition of sacrifice of pure lambs, whose flesh would be burned upon the altar. Therefore, “a procession with branches, up to the horns of the altar” is a call for wives to submit to Yahweh forevermore, so Israel would eternally be filled with the light of truth, as servants to Yahweh. Only living branches can supply that need, not dead ones.

Verse 28 is then where two uses of lower-case spelling of “el” and “elohim” are used, both of which must be seen as David speaking about the souls called to be sacrifice upon Yahweh’s holy altar. The translation by the NRSV says, “You are my God, and I will thank you; you are my God, and I will exalt you.” In reality, the way this verse should be understood is as: “I am a god , and I will confess you , to other gods , I will be exalted because of you.” This becomes a confession [from “wə·’ō·w·ḏe·kā” rooted in “yadah,” meaning “to throw, cast,” as “confessing”] of s soul’s weakness without the presence of Yahweh within. The mission of a wife to God, as David proved in his psalms, is to bring other lost souls into the light of truth, and marriage to Yahweh.

Finally, verse 29 sings, “Give thanks to the Lord, for he is good; his mercy endures for ever.” This is a return to the very beginning of this song of praise, so it can end as a cycle completed, with a new cycle to begin. From a wife of Yahweh having confessed the blessings of becoming one with Yahweh, then others will receive the Holy Spirit and renew this cycle of eternal life.

As a psalm that is sung outside of churches in a ceremony that passes out dead palm leaves for all in attendance to hold, it is important to take it upon oneself and contemplate the words of this song written by David [at least the verses selected to be presented]. No one will take the time to do that for you. The words sing of David being in a loving relationship of commitment to Yahweh. The truth of that relationship – that marriage between a soul and God’s Holy Spirit – is it is not limited to just David.

While David was a king over Israel, it was when he was a boy that God had Samuel anoint David. It was that Anointing that made David the Christ, as a wife of God. Jesus was born with his soul married to Yahweh, so he too was the Anointed One. Still, this song sings praises that all can be just as was David and just as was the man Jesus, because marriage to Yahweh makes one a Son of man, as the Christ. That makes Jesus be reborn time and again in the “elohay” who sacrifice those little-g gods to service to the Lord.

Luke 19:28-40 – Liturgy of the Palm, Year C

After telling a parable to the crowd at Jericho, Jesus went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem. When he had come near Bethphage and Bethany, at the place called the Mount of Olives, he sent two of the disciples, saying, “Go into the village ahead of you, and as you enter it you will find tied there a colt that has never been ridden. Untie it and bring it here. If anyone asks you, ‘Why are you untying it?’ just say this, ‘The Lord needs it.'” So those who were sent departed and found it as he had told them. As they were untying the colt, its owners asked them, “Why are you untying the colt?” They said, “The Lord needs it.” Then they brought it to Jesus; and after throwing their cloaks on the colt, they set Jesus on it. As he rode along, people kept spreading their cloaks on the road. As he was now approaching the path down from the Mount of Olives, the whole multitude of the disciples began to praise God joyfully with a loud voice for all the deeds of power that they had seen, saying,

“Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord!

Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest heaven!”

Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to him, “Teacher, order your disciples to stop.” He answered, “I tell you, if these were silent, the stones would shout out.”

——————–

This is the Gospel selection that will be read by a priest (usually outdoors), prior to the main service inside the nave on Palm Sunday, Year C, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. This begins the “Liturgy of the Palms,” which will precede a singing aloud in unison of Psalm 118 verses, as there is a precession into the nave. In that song of praise David wrote, “I will give thanks to you, for you answered me and have become my salvation. The same stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone.”

In Year A the Gospel reading outside comes from Matthew 21:1-11. In Year B it comes from Mark 11:1-11. This reading from Luke offers some confusion, as to the timing of this event. That confusion can breed doubts of truth being told; so, it is important to explain away all doubts.

It is important to see that Luke tells the story of Mary the mother of Jesus, not the eyewitness accounts of the physician named Luke. The story told in Luke then shows that Mary the mother of Jesus was with him when he stayed in the safety zone that was Beyond the Jordan. Because Jesus was not safe returning to Capernaum, where his mother could be with him there, when Jesus and his disciples went in Perea, Mary went along. Thus, her story tells of the return from there, after Jesus was told of Lazarus being ill (which Mary did not witness, not tell about). That included the story of the blind man healed and the stay with Zacchaeus in Jericho. So, when verse twenty-eight says, “After telling a parable to the crowd at Jericho, Jesus went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem,” that one verse becomes a separation from those verses that follow.

Because Jesus returned with his disciples for the purpose of the Passover coming soon, he came back well prior to his entrance into Jerusalem. His disciples stayed in Bethphage (a house, not a town), while Jesus went into Bethany (a town, as well as a the house of Mary, Martha, and Lazarus), where he raised Lazarus from death. The disciples did not witness that event, so neither Matthew nor Mark wrote about that miracle. Luke also does not write about it; so, that means Mary must have met her brother-in-law Clopas (or Cleopas, brother of Joseph) and his wife Mary, who escorted Mother Mary from Jesus being with the disciples in Bethphage, to Emmaus. Jesus then left Bethphage to raise Lazarus; and, following that was a dinner given in Jesus’ honor at Simon the leper’s house, where Matthew, Mark and John told of Mary Magdalene pouring nard on Jesus’ feet, rubbing the perfume in with her hair. Mother Mary was not a witness to that event; so, Luke did not write about it.

This means that when Luke wrote in verse twenty-nine: “When he had come near Bethphage and Bethany, at the place called the Mount of Olives, he sent two of the disciples,” this is telling of a subsequent time, when Mother Mary (along with Cleopas and wife Mary had returned to meet up with Jesus again, in order to all enter Jerusalem as one large group (with a large group meaning it was safer for Jesus). It is imperative to realize that separation of time, supported by the other Gospel stories, so there is no confusion here, thinking Luke is telling contradictions to the other Gospels.

A while back, most likely when Palm Sunday was in Year B, where the entrance into Jerusalem story is told in Mark 11, I was not writing regular commentaries then; but I read the Liturgy of the Palms then and was moved to investigate that reading. I wrote and published on my WordPress blog this report on Mark 11:1-11. That report has been moved onto my Katrina Pearls website (R. T. Tippett), so it can be found only there. In it, I had a dawning of understanding, as to why archeologists cannot determine where a settlement named Bethphage was located. I realized it was not a town, but a house.

The Hebrew word “bayith,” which becomes transliterated as “bet” or “beth,” when combined with another word. As such, “Bethany” means “House Of Answer, Business, Affliction, Singing,” while “Bethphage” means “House Of Unripe Figs.” Because Bethany is known to be a town (and still is today, called Al-Eizariya – “Place of Lazarus”), but Bethphage is a mystery location, the name explains that it was one of the houses of the vicinity that was the town Bethany, but it was owned by a family who grew figs. This becomes a name of a place that becomes explanatory as to why the disciples would stay there (camp or lodge) and why Mother Mary, Cleopas and Mary would join other family there, before entering Jerusalem.

The dawning came to me that all fruit initially appears in an unripe state. No fruit stays in that state, as all fruit on trees ripens and falls to the ground, where it rots and turns to seed, unless the fruit is picked. Because the Passover festival begins a commanded counting of the gathered produce of the land, fifty days these offerings would be placed in a designated area of the Temple in Jerusalem, where a priest would oversee their maturity (fruits, grains, oils and wines), until declared fit for consumption on Pentecost. All “first fruits” would be gathered in an unripe state; so, there was one estate in Bethany that was known for its fig trees and being where unripe figs would be gathered in omer baskets and ceremoniously taken to the Temple in offering. That harvesting of the unripe figs would be what the disciples did for the time Mother Mary was in Emmaus; but she and her relatives would come to carry baskets of unripe figs to the Temple. Therefore, that explains why this entrance into Jerusalem was not unusual, other than the fact that Jesus knew this would be his final entrance there, before his death; meaning he was the sacrificial lamb being offered, with his disciples being the unripe fruit that would mature on Pentecost.

As for the other detail that Luke writes of, which are mirrored in the accounts of Matthew and Mark, I beg you to read the linked commentary of Mark 11, which is entitled “Understanding Bethphage, a donkey colt, and palm branches.” It is an informative read, one which I will not repeat, knowing this Gospel selection will only be read outside on Palm Sunday, where priests are known to do no sermons of explanation. Instead, I will make a couple of observations that have come to me since I posted my prior commentary.

The first new insight that comes to me is relative to Jesus sending two disciples to a village (on the other side of the peak of Mount Olivet from Bethany), where the Jericho Road split, going to both that village and to Bethany, before joining together again, going down the mount to the Kidron Valley crossing below Solomon’s Temple (the Portico above). Jesus told them to say, if asked why they were untying a colt (and they were asked, so they said what Jesus told them to say), “The Lord needs it.” [NRSV translation] That needs further discussion.

Because Luke’s Gospel (like the other three) is in Greek, there is a disconnect between the Hebrew statement of “Yahweh” and the English translation as “the Lord.” In Greek the word for “Lord” is “Kyrios,” where a slave would call his “master” the lower-case spelling: “kyrios.” This means the capitalization in the Greek scriptures always denotes a divine elevation in meaning, such that “Lord” [“Kyrios”] becomes confused. One is forced to hear Jesus give his disciples a command to say “the Lord needs it,” so it is easy to think “Lord” means Jesus was identifying himself as who needs the colt. Readers think Jesus told his disciples to tell some prearranged friends of Jesus – those who worked for him or followed his commands – “Jesus needs it.” That works until we reach the point of the reading where the people begin singing from Psalm 118 (the accompanying Psalm for this reading).

In an idyllic Christian world, where everyone lazes about on pillows, being fed grapes by cherubs, every word of Scripture is spoken by the Biblical characters in English paraphrases. Christians love how ancient Israelites sang songs in a yet invented language – the only one American Christians know. American Christians walk in precession from an outdoors setting, where pieces of palm leaves are passed out and everyone begins reciting Psalm 118 in English. In verse 26 they all recite: “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord; we bless you from the house of the Lord.” American Christians then imagine themselves reenacting that scene in ancient Jerusalem, where everyone said “Lord.”

The reality is Jesus spoke Aramaic, as did all his disciples and family members. When they went down the hill and crossed over to the road that went along the eastern wall, a boundary for the City of David, the words sung by the Jews were in Hebrew, so “Yahweh” was sung, not “Kyrios.” The people all knew Psalm 118 and sang loudly, “bā·rūḵ hab·bā bə·šêm Yah·weh.” When that realization is made, Jesus then told his two disciples to go into the village and untie a colt that had never been ridden, and if anyone asked (and they did), tell them, “Yahweh needs it.” After all, that is the truth. Yahweh had spoken through the prophet Zechariah, which prophesied “your king comes to you … humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.” So, Jesus had nothing to do with needing a donkey colt. His Father needed it, so Jesus could fulfill prophesy.

In both Matthew and Mark (not Luke or John), after Jesus had entered Jerusalem and left to return home (to Bethany), we are told of Jesus going to a barren fig tree, cursing it, causing it to wither and die. It should bot be seen as disconnected from the meaning of Bethphage. The fig tree must be seen as one of that “House of Unripe Figs.” In the botany of fig trees, those which bear fruit only do so for thirty-five years. Before they mature so they can begin to bear fruit (those species that are fruit bearing), it usually takes five years before a new fig tree gives forth fruit. Knowing this, it should be seen that: a.) the fig tree was not one owned by anyone other than a family who knew Jesus well; b.) the fig tree was not new and should have produced at least one unripe fig that had not been picked for offering; and, 3.) the fig tree was barren, so it was wasting good soil that could be where a new fig tree would be planted.

As a Gospel reading given ‘air time’ in a limited capacity as the liturgy of the palm, it should be realized to bear the fruit of meaning that is still of Lenten value. That value is to realize Lent is not only a testing of self, because other selves are likewise being equally tested at the same time. The test of Lent is to understand passing does not make one king of the world. Instead, it makes one willingly display how humble and lowly one is, in service to Yahweh. When “some Pharisees asked Jesus to make the people stop singing,” it was because everyone knew Jesus was making a mockery of those who ruled over the people. The test of Lent is about one’s commitment to serve Yahweh; so, when comes and says, “Yahweh needs it,” you are tested to believe that is the truth.

Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29 – A round stone and flesh going up in smoke

1 Give thanks to Yahweh, for he is good; *

his mercy endures forever.

2 Let Israel now proclaim, *

“His mercy endures forever.”

—–

19 Open for me the gates of righteousness; *

I will enter them; I will offer thanks to Yah.

20 “This is the gate of Yahweh; *

he who is righteous may enter.”

21 I will give thanks to you, for you answered me *

and have become my salvation.

22 The same stone which the builders rejected *

has become the chief cornerstone.

23 This is Yahweh doing, *

and it is marvelous in our eyes.

24 On this day Yahweh has acted; *

we will rejoice and be glad in it.

25 Hosannah, Yahweh, hosannah! *

Yahweh, send us now success.

26 Blessed is he who comes in the name of Yahweh; *

we bless you from the house of Yahweh.

27 el is Yahweh; he has shined upon us; *

form a procession with branches up to the horns of the altar.

28 “You are eli, and I will thank you; *

you are my elohay, and I will exalt you.”

29 Give thanks to Yahweh, for he is good; *

his mercy endures forever.

——————–

On March 31, 2021 I posted an interpretation of this Psalm, which is read each Palm Sunday, in Years A, B, and C. I recommend reading that analysis by following this link here. I am reposting this with adjustments in the NRSV text, which I was not making in my earlier commentary. You will note that there are ten places where David wrote the proper name “Yahweh,” only to have some modern English translation service change that proper name to a generic “Lord.” Also, in verse nineteen, the word written by David is “Yah,” which is an abbreviated form of “Yahweh.” I have restored that written by David in bold type.

In verse twenty-seven is a use of the Hebrew word “el,” which is misleading to translate it as a capitalized “God.” It and the two forms of “el” that are “eli” and “elohay” (both translated as “my God”) are misleading in the way they were translated; so, I have restored the Hebrew text [transliterations] in italics. I will explain my reasons for this soon.

This song of praise is closely associated with the entrance of Jesus into Jerusalem, prior to his final Passover festival there. The whole of the theatrics of that “triumphal entrance” is anything but. In Zechariah’s prophecy, where verse nine says, “your king is coming to you , righteous and having salvation he , lowly and riding on a donkey , and upon a colt foal of a donkey .” That prophecy, which Jesus fulfilled, says everyone who thinks Yahweh is going to send some human hero to become another temporal David reborn is a fool. The prophecy say celebrate the fact there will never be anyone other than Jesus. Thus, that needs to be understood in this song of David.

In verses nineteen and twenty, David wrote of “the gates of righteousness” and “the gate of Yahweh.” This needs to be merged with Zechariah’s prophecy of “the king is coming to you.” Prior to Zechariah writing that, he called to the “daughters of Zion [meaning Dryness]” and the “daughters of Jerusalem [meaning “Teaching Peace],” with “daughters” needing to be seen as every soul living in a body of flesh. A body of flesh is a “daughter,” who is then the bridesmaid of Yahweh. The ”gate” is then the marriage pathway to a soul, penetrated by the divine. The “king” is then the new Lord over one’s flesh, which is the “righteousness” of “Yahweh.” The symbolism of Jesus riding a donkey colt into Jerusalem, through the Dung Gate, says one is sacrificing one’s soul to a most divine possession. Nothing in the material world will catch one’s eye, as all heads are bowed in total submission to Yahweh, because salvation is one’s only prayer being answered in holy matrimony.

In the past several months (or so), I have come to an entirely new view of the meaning of verse twenty-two, which sings, “The same stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone.” When writing about the stone that sealed the tomb where Jesus’ body had been laid (the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea), it dawned on me how such a round stone was symbolic of how being reborn as Jesus places a movable stone, which allows a soul to escape a sealed in death, gaining eternal life. It makes no logical sense that any builder of merit would reject a solidly fashioned cube of stone as a cornerstone for a permanent building. However, they would reject a round stone all day long; and, that means one is not building materially (where mortals have no permanence), but spiritually.

The death one avoid by the round stone as one’s cornerstone is that of being a soul born into mortal flesh. Flesh is “mortal” because it will die. When the flesh dies, then the soul is released for Judgment. To be found sealed in a tomb with a squared stone sealing the entrance-exit, then death means coming back again into a body of flesh that is bound to die (repeated death). Only when one’s soul has been married to Yahweh and merged with the soul of His Son can one die of self, without physical dying. One becomes a changed person, as a Saint.

Verses twenty-three through twenty-six sing repeatedly (six times) about “Yahweh.” When we hear the song say, “This is Yahweh’s doing,” that is creating a Son that will be the stone rolled away after death, so one resurrects spiritual as Jesus did. We become Jesus because of Yahweh. This is divine marriage; so, when verse twenty-six sings, “Blessed is he who comes in the name of Yahweh,” the ”name of Yahweh” says one’s soul has taken on His name in marriage AND one has been born in the name of Jesus, as a Christ.

In verse twenty-seven, where David sang, “form a procession with branches up to the horns of the altar,” this sings of a wedding “procession.” The “horns of the altar” are features of the Temple (Tabernacle for David) altar of sacrifice. Thus, marriage to Yahweh means the sacrifice of one’s soul, so it no longer claims control over one’s born flesh. Self goes up in smoke, which is a delight to Yahweh.

When verses twenty-seven and twenty-eight then mention “el” and then “eli” and “elohay,” this sings of the ministry in the name of Jesus that comes. An “el” is an eternal presence, like an angel is. A soul is an eternal entity, but it is not an “el,” per se. An “el” is a spiritual possession within one’s soul-flesh. This can be a demonic spirit that possesses a soul, making it do evil deeds. However, when “el is Yahweh” is stated, that becomes a statement of a divine possession, by Yahweh’s Spirit. That then leads to David singing “my god” (“eli” and “elohay”), these come in quotation marks, as said to a soul by Yahweh. That means Yahweh has heard one’s cries of “thanks” and told those souls “You are mine, as Yahweh elohim.”

As a Psalm that will be sung outside a church, in a precession into a nave for the reading of so much scripture that none of it can be preached (in a twelve minute timeframe), that means the test of Lent is to do your own contemplation about what scripture means to your own soul. Everything in Scripture is valuable insight towards deep faith. Going to a church to have priests do nothing that teaches the meaning of the Word says the blind are leading the blind to a huge pit. One must have more than twelve minutes to devote to Yahweh a week; or, one must plan on repeating life all over again (if lucky).

Isaiah 50:4-9a – A Passion prerequisite that requires a Teacher of Yahweh to explain

[4] adonay Yahweh has given me

the tongue of a teacher,

that I may know how to sustain

the weary with a word.

Morning by morning he wakens–

wakens my ear

to listen as those who are taught.

[5] adonay Yahweh has opened my ear,

and I was not rebellious,

I did not turn backward.

[6] I gave my back to those who struck me,

and my cheeks to those who pulled out the beard;

I did not hide my face

from insult and spitting.

[7] wadonay Yahweh helps me;

therefore I have not been disgraced;

therefore I have set my face like flint,

and I know that I shall not be put to shame;

he who vindicates me is near.

[8] Who will contend with me?

Let us stand up together.

Who are my adversaries?

Let them confront me.

[9a] It is adonay Yahweh who helps me;

who will declare me guilty?

——————–

This song of Isaiah is read on every Passion Sunday (a.k.a. Palm Sunday), in Years A, B, and C.

September 2018 can be searched here. This is what my observations were, when this reading was part of the Proper 19 readings, for the seventeenth Sunday after Pentecost lessons.

March 2021 can also be searched here. This was what I wrote when this was part of the Passion Sunday Year B service.

August 2021 also in here to be searched. This was when the same reading is presented on the sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost [Proper 19], during Year B.

In my last commentary, I adjusted the text to show “adonay,” “wadonay,” and “Yahweh.” I pointed out how that does not mean “the Lord God.” The word “adon” is the singular number Hebrew word that says “lord” (not capitalized), with the two variations of “adonay” being the plural version, clearly saying “lords.” To then pair that with the fools who translate Hebrew into paraphrased English (besides their changing a plural word into the singular and capitalizing that as a singular “Lord”), they all of a sudden stop translating “Yahweh” as “the Lord,” making Him be a “God.” Of course, they could explain that by saying, “Oh! Our paraphrase switched the order of the words written, so we translated “Yahweh” as “the Lord,” making “adonay” become “God.”’ Still, that ignores the plural number and their lie needing to be translated as “the Lord of lords.” That would actually be more in line with the true meaning of “adonay.”

In the time that has passed since August of 2021 (six months), I have come to realize more clearly that “adonay” is similar to the Hebrew word “elohim,” but with a slightly higher connotation. One of the “elohim” (an “el”) is an ‘angel in the flesh,’ which means a soul in a body of flesh has become married to Yahweh, with His Son’s soul (that of Adam-Jesus) resurrected within that soul hosting flesh, becoming divinely possessed. That divine possession is an “elohim” (one being an “el”). One has to reach that state of existence to become a Saint, one in the name of Jesus, as a Christ. That is the basic statement of divine possession. However, becoming one of the “adonay” (or “adonai,” as an “adon”) is the purpose for Yahweh divinely possessing a soul animating flesh; and, that is to teach.

In verse four, this aspect of teaching (as a Saint) is explained as Isaiah singing, “adonay Yahweh has given me the tongue of a teacher, that I may know how to sustain the weary with a word. Morning by morning he wakens — wakens my ear to listen as those who are taught.” This becomes why the disciples called Jesus their “Teacher, Master, or Lord.” In John 13:13 (when Jesus had washed the feet of his disciples at the Seder meal in the upper room), he said, “you call me This Teacher kai this Lord , kai honorably you say , I am indeed .” This is the truth spoken by Jesus, because his soul in his flesh was not only as a Yahweh elohim (the Son of Yahweh reborn – Adam’s soul returning as one whose name says, “Yah[weh] Saves”), but also as the epitome of an “adon” or “lord,” as a “teacher” of those who sought the truth of Yahweh. Isaiah was another soul in human flesh that was an “elohim,” who was sent out to others, for the purpose of being “a teacher” of Yahweh’s truth.

Verse four states that clearly.

In the rest of these verses, which I have commented on prior (multiple times), it is important to see that an “adonay Yahweh” is a divine “teacher” of truth, where he listens to that told to his possessing soul (Adam-Jesus) by Yahweh [as Jesus said, “For I myself have not spoken, but this having sent me Father the same, me a commandment gave what I should say kai what I should speak.” – (John 12:49)]. These verses from Isaiah 50 reflect that same obedience, as a soul divinely possessed by the Father – Yahweh. Thus, it is important to see how the persecution of others, who direct their anger at anyone who acts righteously, to force them to stop pretending to be ‘holier than thus,’ because they do not believe such righteousness is truly possible. It is not only possible; but Isaiah (and Jesus too) sang how he could withstand the punishment, because he knew his ego had already been sacrificed for a much higher cause. Isaiah (and Jesus too) knew that punishment resulting in death would only release an “elohim” soul to eternal life, having already died as a lord over one’s flesh.

As an Old Testament song sung inside a nave, prior to the reciting of about two chapters of Luke (in Year C), no priest will have the balls – nor any parishioners have the guts – to spend a whole day explaining and listening to explanations (verse by verse), about everything that has been read aloud on what is called “Passion Sunday.” That is a reflection that no one is an “elohim,” no one is a Saint, no one is an “adon” of Yahweh, and (certainly) no one is Jesus reborn, as a Christ. It says Christianity has been reduced to some form of entertainment that is all about the pageantry of show, with no one ever able to become a teacher like Isaiah or Jesus. The only thing anyone gets out of this day is a blade of palm branch … and that is then given back to the church, so they can form them into crosses that will be passed out at another time, before collecting those to be burned for ashes to be added to oil (used on Ash Wednesday – more pageantry).

Aside Note:

In case this is difficult to grasp, it really is not. A soul in a body of flesh is the “lord” (“adon“) of its flesh … the flesh into which Yahweh breathed a soul at birth. As a child that grows, the fleshy brain (the seat of one’s “lord” or “adon“) is taught many things: from the environment, from parents, from friends, and from school teachers. A fleshy brain absorbs knowledge like a sponge (with not all knowledge the truth). When puberty kicks in, the body of flesh (extensions of the fleshy brain) begins to scream out, “Hey! What about me!” The body of flesh slowly becomes the “lord” over the brain, so the brain begins to justify the desires of the body of flesh. This is regardless of what one has been taught to guard against. Then, it takes an innocent soul and enslaves it to follow the whims of the flesh, which is what religion says are sins. While sins are natural, some become addictions. External things of the world … like drugs, sex, money … become influences (gods or elohim) that take total control over a soul and its body of flesh, making it not only sin, but do heinous acts that are criminal. In the Bible are stories of those demonically possessed; and, such demonic possessions are the presence of an evil soul within one’s birth soul. This becomes the “lord” or “adon” one was naturally born with being enslaved by a Satanic or Devilish soul that joins with one’s soul; and, that demonic presence becomes one’s “Lord.” This capitalized “Lord” is why a true Christian does not want to refer to Yahweh as something so general and non-specific. To have evil demons cast out, one needs to seek Yahweh’s help. That leads to an encounter with a Saint, who is a normal soul possessed by Yahweh’s Spirit, reborn with Jesus as his “Lord.” That presence initiates the Spirit, sent by Yahweh’s Son’s soul to enter one’s natural soul, casting out all bad demons. That is Baptism by the Spirit, which cleanses a natural soul, in the marriage of a soul to the Yahweh Spirit. The presence of Jesus’ soul within one’s soul (a good possession of spirit – the resurrection of Jesus within) makes his soul become one’s “Lord” or “Adon.” Jesus rules as “Lord” over one’s natural soul and its flesh. Rule over the natural soul ensures that soul a return to be one with Yahweh, when it leaves its body of flesh. If you would like to read more on this subject, look up Eudaimonia. The root word there is “daímōn,” which is where the word “demon” comes. It actually refers to a “spirit,” which is like a “soul.” One needs to realize there are bad spirits and there are good spirits. The capitalized “Spirit” (“Pneuma“) is the best Spirit to be possessed by. It is the challenge of a soul’s presence in matter. The soul must find the way back to Yahweh. Matter becomes the tomb, as well as the “Lord” to overcome. The antonym is “Disdemona” (from Greek “δυσ + δαίμων), which means “ill-fated, unfortunate.” Any spirit that takes over a body of flesh, enslaving a natural soul to serve it, is a “Lord.” A natural soul cannot defeat any “Lord.” Thus, a soul must surrender itself to Yahweh in divine union, which means His Son Jesus (“Yahweh Saves”) is one’s “Lord,” who defeats all others “gods” or “elohim.”

Psalm 31:9-16 – Begging for mercy when you don’t really think you need it

9 Have mercy on me, Yahweh, for I am in trouble; *

my eye is consumed with sorrow, and also my throat and my belly.

10 For my life is wasted with grief, and my years with sighing; *

my strength fails me because of affliction, and my bones are consumed.

11 I have become a reproach to all my enemies and even to my neighbors,

a dismay to those of my acquaintance; *

when they see me in the street they avoid me.

12 I am forgotten like a dead man, out of mind; *

I am as useless as a broken pot.

13 For I have heard the whispering of the crowd; fear is all around; *

they put their heads together against me; they plot to take my life.

14 But as for me, I have trusted in you, Yahweh. *

I have said, “You are elohay.

15 My times are in your hand; *

rescue me from the hand of my enemies, and from those who persecute me.

16 Make your face to shine upon your servant, *

and in your loving-kindness save me.”

——————–

This is the Psalm that will be read aloud in unison or sung by a cantor (inside the nave), after a congregation has met outside the inner sanctuary of a church, holding palm spears and reciting in precession verses from Psalm 118. Here is when they begin to go brain-numb from having reached their maximum normal Sunday allowance of readings, with still many more minutes of readings to come, before wondering, “Now I remember why I only go to church a couple of times a year!” They have shown up on Palm-Passion Sunday because there is no sermon; but, they show up having forgotten how dreadfully long the service is.

In March 2021 I posted this commentary on this selection from Psalm 31, which can be searched here by that name and number. That was when this same Psalm selection was part of the Year B schedule of readings. This Psalm selection is read every Passion Sunday, in Years A, B, and C. It is not read at any other time in the lectionary schedule; so, because no sermon will ever be preached on a Sunday when the Episcopalian ‘twelve minute rule’ has already been broken by reading aloud half the New Testament (well, almost two chapters of Luke in Year C), nobody’s brain is capable of focusing on religious thought. Like everything about finding true Salvation for a soul … it is best done alone, without allowing any church to get in the way, mucking everything up.

I have come to the conclusion that the reason Christians allow their English translation service to change “Yahweh” to “the Lord” and “elohay” to “our God” is because they do not want to ever accept a Jewish dedication to scriptural memorization. Christians would much rather learn five sets of verse and chorus from a popular song book: example being Silent Night or Old Time Religion (where scripture has been aborted by some songwriter that never understood any meaning to scripture), than to memorize one hundred fifty psalms, divinely inspired by David (and maybe others) – In Hebrew – because that would take away from so much party time in life (by whatever means one calls ‘partying’). So, even though most modern Jews know some Yiddish and pretend to be closer to God because of extensive early education in religious scripture, Christians want to be known for being dumb as stumps, while superior because the Jews rejected Jesus.

This Psalm selection is chosen to be sung aloud on Passion Sunday, because the Passion (a word meaning “suffering,” not sexual rubbing) never is about Jesus. It is repeated year after year because of all the new souls that need to be “Suffering” like David wrote of them all begging for forgiveness. Those who only show up at some Christian church to be entertained a few times a year will find their souls in this position one day … because ALL MORTALS DIE. Bodies of flesh do not beg for forgiveness. Souls do.

As a song of lament and begging for forgiveness (something David did later in life, but Jesus never did) to be read aloud on Passion Sunday, the point is to foresee your own worthless soul facing your inevitable death and have a ‘come to Jesus’ talk with Yahweh [learn his name you lazy sinner!]. Learn that when David sang, “I have said, “You are my gods,” that truly means Yahweh says to His ‘angels in the flesh’ – His elohim – “You trusted in Me, when you became extensions of Me on earth … as Yahweh elohim. An “elohim” is only going to receive the Salvation of eternal life. Party hardy you fools and find this truth out when you miserable end times come. Then prostrate your souls before Yahweh and explain to Him why you never had time to serve Him in life. Now is the time to practice being sincere with you future answer … in tears … knowing something bleak is going to be your Judgment.