Tag Archives: Proper 8 Year B

2 Samuel 1:1, 17-27 – Preparing the high and mighty for their fall

After the death of Saul, when David had returned from defeating the Amalekites, David remained two days in Ziklag.

David intoned this lamentation over Saul and his son Jonathan. (He ordered that The Song of the Bow be taught to the people of Judah; it is written in the Book of Jashar.) He said:

Your glory, O Israel, lies slain upon your high places!
How the mighty have fallen!

Tell it not in Gath,
proclaim it not in the streets of Ashkelon;

or the daughters of the Philistines will rejoice,
the daughters of the uncircumcised will exult.

You mountains of Gilboa,
let there be no dew or rain upon you,
nor bounteous fields!

For there the shield of the mighty was defiled,
the shield of Saul, anointed with oil no more.

From the blood of the slain,
from the fat of the mighty,

the bow of Jonathan did not turn back,
nor the sword of Saul return empty.

Saul and Jonathan, beloved and lovely!
In life and in death they were not divided;

they were swifter than eagles,
they were stronger than lions.

O daughters of Israel, weep over Saul,
who clothed you with crimson, in luxury,
who put ornaments of gold on your apparel.

How the mighty have fallen
in the midst of the battle!

Jonathan lies slain upon your high places.
I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan;

greatly beloved were you to me;
your love to me was wonderful,
passing the love of women.

How the mighty have fallen,
and the weapons of war perished!

——————————————————————————–

This is an optional Old Testament selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for the Sixth Sunday after Pentecost, Year B 2018. In the numbering system that lists each Sunday in an ordinal fashion, this Sunday is referred to as Proper 8. If chosen, this will next be read aloud in church by a reader on Sunday, July 1, 2018. It is important because it tells how it does not matter how great one is or how great the strength of a nation is, the mighty who are without God will fall.

This is a song written by David after he has learned of the deaths of Saul and his three sons, including his beloved “brother” Jonathan. When this is read in the vacuum, without the story that leads up to this song realized, it can become misleading as to why David would write such a memorial.

It must be realized that Saul had unsuccessfully tried to kill David, letting him flee in hopes that Israel’s enemies would kill him. Rather than that happen, the promise made by Goliath in his challenge that was eventually taken up by young David, “Choose a man and have him come down to me. If he is able to fight and kill me, we will become your subjects,” (1 Samuel 17:8-9) was kept by Achish king of Gath, who feared David. David (in verse 1 here) was returning to Ziklag (a Philistine city given to him by Achish son of King Maok of Gath), but while away the Amalekites (the equivalent of modern day Bedouin Arabians) had burned the city down and taken all the wives as their spoil. Two of David’s wives were in the number of those taken, so David found them, and then defeated the Amalekites with his 600 soldiers that had followed him from Israel.

In this map, one can see how far apart David was from Saul when that happened.  Saul was killed, along with his sons, in the battle of Mount Gilboa. The Philistines, including warriors from Gath, had surrounded Saul’s army; and Saul sought out a medium, who put him in touch with the recently deceased Samuel.  The ghost of Samuel said Saul would be with him soon.  Thus, after Saul received word that all of his sons had fallen in battle, he committed suicide.

Supposedly, suicide would prevent the Philistines from desecrating his body, but the bodies of Saul and his three sons were beheaded and mutilated, then hung on the wall of a holy building in Beth Shan. Citizens of Jabesh Gilead, who were long supporters of Saul, heard of this desecration and traveled to remove the bodies so they could be burned and their bones given a proper burial.

News of this event reached David while he was in Ziklag, a Philistine town. Twice prior David had been sent by God to rescue Saul from battles, and Saul had given his word that he would not try to kill David. Still, David acted under the orders of the Philistine King of Gath, where David lived in exile for 16 months. The news of Saul and Jonathan’s deaths came via an escaped Amalekite who came upon Saul, after he had “fallen on his sword,” but had lived. Saul was then leaning on his spear, knowing he would die, so he asked the Amalekite to kill him, which he did. The Amalekite then took Saul’s crown and a band from his arm to give to David in Ziklag. Because the Amalekite admitted killing Saul, David ordered him be put to death.

This history is important to realize, as it plays a role in understanding this song. By naming it Song of the Bow, the bow was the weapon of the archer, thus it was a weapon of war. Jonathan was known for his abilities with a bow, so the song must be seen as an ode to the man David loved, who had been lost in war. The song was to be taught to the people of Judah as a way of teaching the children, those who would grow into soldiers.  The lesson of the song was for them not to ever become overconfident in their own personal strengths and talents, as war has a way of humbling even the greatest warriors.

The repeated refrain is “How the mighty have fallen!” That translation omits the Hebrew word “ḥā·lāl,” which says, “is killed” of “is slain,” and removes any question as if “fallen” can mean a simple fall that can be recovered from. The mighty have been slain, thus they have fallen.

This message would be one sung by new army recruits as they exercised their muscles, as a reminder that war should always be a last resort and always with God on one’s side. If one then falls in battle, one’s soul will be better treated.

We also read that this poem of David was written into the Book of Jasher, where “jasher” means “upright,” while also having translations as “conscientious” and “proposal of peace.” In a way that is not intended, but applies to the meaning of “upright” as “being in a vertical position,” the dead are horizontal, while the living are “upright.” In this regard, the Book of Jasher would be a collection of songs and writings of memorable events in the history of war that told of the joys of victory and the agonies of defeat, written by those who were left standing after the battles were over.

The book then acts as a way to teach the lesson that history repeats, telling the stories of the ups and downs of life. It tells the lesson of just and unjust war.  As such, it echoed what Jesus spoke to Peter, after he cut an arresting guard’s ear off: “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.” (Matthew 26:52)

This song takes the memory of Saul, who was no longer loved by the Israelite people, and paints him as strong and courageous, which was the truth in part. Still, even the strongest kings stand trembling in the face of a giant that is obviously undefeatable or insurmountable. Only those who know God has sent them to war have the confidence to overcome great odds.

The desecration of Saul’s body in defeat was erased from the record of David’s psalm. Jonathan was also seen in the glory of his past victories, not the desecration of his and his brothers’ bodies and the humiliation of their public display. David erased that image from the minds of all who would sing this song as a reminder that some wars must be fought.  Those call upon the soldiers who are “swifter than eagles,” and “stronger than lions.”  However, that alone is not enough.

When David sang to the Israelites, telling them to weep, and saying to remember how Saul had “clothed you with crimson, in luxury,” and had “put ornaments of gold on your apparel,” his death meant all that glory was lost.  His greatness alone had brought the spoils of victory, but his defeat meant other victors would reap that reward.  Therefore, “How the mighty have fallen in the midst of the battle!” meant Israel was then without a king and the spoils of the victor … the enemy left upright … would be based on the results of that battle lost.

Scholars say that the Book of Jasher only appears here and in the Book of Joshua. It is not a verifiable Hebrew document, as it has no record that has survived. Its mention here comes when David was in Philistine Ziklag, as an ally to the Philistines. This leads me to see the purpose of such a book was to be one read by the enemies of Israel.  The Israelites had their own record of God’s achievements through great men.

This would mean the Book of Upright Men was a document of Canaanite origin, so the non-Israelite people could remember there were more mighty warriors that had fallen against the Israelite LORD, than there were victories against those whose leaders (like Saul) has forsaken their LORD and depended on their personal might. This makes the Book of Jasher a book of praise and mourning for all who have gone to battle without the LORD on their side.  Victories would only come when the Israelites had turned their backs of Yahweh elohim – the LORD of lords.

David then sang, “Jonathan lies slain upon your high places. I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan; greatly beloved were you to me; your love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.” This is a tribute to Jonathan by David, where he expressed in words the soul connection the two young men felt between each other. In today’s perverse world, some would see this love between David and Jonathan as evidence of their sharing their bodies with one another in homosexual activity. This must not be read into this.

David was the youngest of Jesse’s sons, and his older brothers probably never spent quality time with David. They loved each other as family, but David might have been given responsibilities that kept him away from social contacts with other boys that were his age. When David first met Jonathan, he had just killed Goliath and was not yet a man. Jonathan and David connected as brothers who cared deeply for one another in normal, natural, and typical ways. Their friendship was purely platonic and the epitome of “best friends forever.” Each had wives who met their sexual needs.

Another comparison is to blood brothers, those not related by swear an oath with the exchange of blood.

In this regard, one has to realize that David is pure in his actions to all people and totally led by God within. David was chosen by God and anointed by Samuel to be the replacement for Saul.  That made David God’s chosen child, with God knowing the heart and mind of all His servants.  Because Moses commanded laws be memorized and obeyed, the law that says a priest of the LORD cannot be homosexual eliminates that possibility from David. The law states, “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.” (Leviticus 20:13)

Let me address this law, in terms of accepting that there is, has always been, and will always be homosexual human beings on earth. It is no different than any other sin that eliminates one from serving God.  To serve God, one must show one’s devotion by abstaining from all sins, including all of a sexual nature.  Therefore, homosexuality falls into the category that includes all sins forbidden by law: murder, stealing, coveting, and anything else that sets a priest of the LORD apart from the common riffraff of the world.

God chose the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as His children who would become His priests, because they had a religion that prepared them for fulfilling that holy purpose. The Egyptians were not chosen, for example. That was not a condemnation of Egyptians, but a statement that they were not prepared to serve only the One God.

In effect, by not choosing the Egyptians, God allowed them to be like everyone else in the world and do whatever they deemed good. The Laws of Moses are not for a government to order upon their citizens.  The Israelites were chosen because they rejected the laws allowed under Egyptian rule, because those laws were against the laws of a priest to the One God.  One can only voluntarily become a priest to the LORD, but that requires a marriage commitment – till death do you part.

Homosexuality might be deemed good by some cultures (even some subcultures in this culture we live in today), but that disqualifies one from being a priest of the LORD. One cannot serve God when one has been put to death by the sin of male homosexuality, having the blood of that death upon the ego that would not bend to meet the needs of the LORD.  In effect, sin is a state of selfishness and homosexuality is pure selfish desires.

Many are sent, but only one is granted entry.

As a potential reading for the sixth Sunday after Pentecost, when one’s personal ministry should be underway the call is to not to think that oneself is almighty and thy will must be done. As David’s wish is to forever remember those who have fallen from the heights of rulership, this song is named “the bow” or “the bowman, archer.” The lesson to be learned is how not to shoot arrows in defense of a nation that has become wayward, because without God’s blessing then the arrows sent flying will come back upon one.

The story behind this song of lament needs to be known so it can become a comparison to today. Israel had asked Samuel to arrange a king of their choice to lead them. Saul became the Israelite’s surrogate god. He became a mighty man and his sons became princes. The same national setting surrounds every nation in the world today. God is leading no one, because everyone stands and salutes a mighty man that is only as mighty as his body allows him to avoid the bullets and swords of his enemies. To be an Israelite who is devoted to the One God (Yahweh), one has to see how the government of our nation is trying to kill the religious, just as Saul tried to kill David.

Oklahoma here, Alabama and others led the way.

To be in ministry today, in this setting of turmoil, where one nation is a house divided against itself, one needs to find safety by understanding the enemy. David found safety in Gath, one of the five Philistine cities, living among those who warred with Israel (just as the Palestinians do today in Gaza). The enemy is not the issue, as we are told:

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” (Matthew 5:43-48)

The issue is those who say they believe in Jesus Christ and say they love God, but then they become so high and mighty that they cannot live up to those words of promise. They shoot out Biblical arrows that condemn the world, but then fall on their own swords in fear of what the enemy will do to them, once the battle is lost and there are no more quotes to be thrown. America and Western Europe have set themselves up for defeat by kneeling before technology and the weaponry that makes a minimal size militaries seem adequate enough to appease their lesser gods. Borders are slack or non-existent, to the point that foreigners of all kinds regularly stream into the nations of the West. Meanwhile, the enemy has dressed themselves as Christian lambs that quote Jesus, turning his focus on love so it seems to the weak-minded that Jesus meant trusting evil ways in one’s midst can be good. Thus, the Western world is poised on Mount Gilboa for another surprising defeat.

“How the mighty have fallen!”

Ministry understands the messages of Jesus Christ and tells others the truth, which most do not want to hear. Jesus never said to live amongst your enemies. He never said to surrender the philosophy of the One God for the equal rights of all gods, good and bad. One loves an enemy by accepting that the world is full of enemies. One loves an enemy by not getting in an enemy’s face and calling the enemy evil. One loves an enemy by not living amongst one’s enemies, so the enemy has the freedom to hate you in abstentia.

As the saying goes, “Out of sight, out of mind,” one loves an enemy by not focusing on hating an enemy, which is the natural emotion held between enemies. America has fallen in love with its Saul (the Constitution), to a degree that it thinks one must prove it loves its enemy by letting its enemy inside the walls of the nation, even letting the enemy govern the land. A nation cannot serve two masters – Christianity, Capitalism, Socialism, Atheism, Science, Military Technology, et al (choose two?).  the reason is, paraphrasing as Jesus stated, “for either the nation will hate the one master, and love the other; or else the nation will hold to the one master, and despise the other. America cannot serve God and all the wealth from which it has risen to great heights.

Who can pick only one to bow before?

“O daughters of Christianity, weep over the Constitution, whose words clothed you with crimson, in luxury, whose promises put ornaments of gold on your apparel.”  The illusion of freedom brought low-wage slaves to your shores, willing to live in squalor for the American Dream, while fighting its wars against all who would oppose that independence.  America has been a nation of immigrants willing to kill or be killed in the name of good versus evil.  God has rewarded Americans with the spoils of war.  Now, we have seen the enemy and he is us.

Ministry today sees the hatred that permeates this nation. The enemy has been allowed to be among us and that presence causes hatred to spew out. If only we had a safe place to not be faced with our enemies, but there is none. Our neighbors have become our enemies, making it difficult to walk down a street without glares and whispers of contempt being made.

The nebulosity of the Law, which are akin to those brought in by Jezebel, now chokes the life out of the West’s love of God. We trusted in human leaders and elected official to guide us the right way; but they failed us as we failed ourselves.  Our governors are incapable of straightening out the mess they have made.

Ministry does not add fuel to the fire, but it does not ignore the fire that is already burning. People sense a grave danger ahead and they are seeking knowledge and reason to proceed. The answer can be seen in this song of lament. There is only one master one can serve, and few have chosen the One God.

Ministry should be teaching the children this song of the bow, so they can prepare for the deaths that come to hero worship; but the lesson is long lost. It seems too lost for anyone to turn and face God at this late juncture, sacrificing all the things that freedom and equality bring.

The cry has gone out: “Make America great again!”

The enemies cry back: “Death to America!”

If it cannot be us, then to hell with unity!

“How the mighty have fallen in the midst of the battle!”

“How the mighty have fallen, and the weapons of war perished!”

And the ministers in pulpits sing their political songs of self-righteousness and the people all gladly sing along. “Everyone we hate is our enemy!” they sing. “If you do not think like us, then you are one of them!”

“Onward Christian soldiers, marching as to war.”  The bowmen have quivers filled with barbs of condemnation, poisoned-dipped with lines of Scripture, to be aimed at friend or foe alike.  The lesson is it has happened before.  We are to know it will happen again, unless we remember this Song of the Bow.

Lamentations 3:21-33 – It is good to wait for Yahweh

This I call to mind,

and therefore I have hope:

The steadfast love of Yahweh never ceases,

his mercies never come to an end;

they are new every morning;

great is your faithfulness.

Yahweh is my portion,” says my soul,

“therefore I will hope in him.”

Yahweh is good to those who wait for him,

to the soul that seeks him.

It is good that one should wait quietly

for the salvation of Yahweh.

It is good for one to bear

the yoke in youth,

to sit alone in silence

when [Yahweh] has imposed it,

to put one’s mouth to the dust

(there may yet be hope),

to give one’s cheek to the smiter,

and be filled with insults.

For adonay will not

reject forever.

Although he causes grief, he will have compassion

according to the abundance of his steadfast love;

for he does not willingly afflict

or grieve anyone.

——————–

This reading selection from Jeremiah’s Lamentations is the first optional “Response” that will accompany the Track 2 Old Testament option from the Wisdom of Solomon.  There it is written, “God did not make death, And he does not delight in the death of the living.”  If chosen, these readings will precede a reading from Paul’s second letter to the Christians of Corinth, where he wrote: “I do not mean that there should be relief for others and pressure on you, but it is a question of a fair balance between your present abundance and their need, so that their abundance may be for your need, in order that there may be a fair balance.”  All will accompany a reading from Mark’s Gospel, where the Spirit passed through Jesus, healing a woman, prompting him to say, “Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace, and be healed of your disease.”

In this song of sorrow, there are sets of three verses for each letter of the Hebrew alphabet.  Verses 19 and 20 [not included] fall under the heading of Zayin [ז], the seventh letter.  The verses 31-33 then fall under the heading of Kaf [כ], the eleventh letter.  In these thirteen verses, the NRSV [and thereby the Episcopal Church] has presented a capitalized “Lord” six times.  In reality [as there are no capital letters in Hebrew] this assumption is based on Jeremiah having written different certain words, where that difference is not recognized as such, generalizing everything as “Lord.”  One of those times is pure manufacturing, as a third person form of a verb is assumed to be “Lord,” when nothing so specific was written.  The first four words written by Jeremiah can be capitalized as the proper name for God, which is “Yahweh.”  The last reference [verse 31, but all verse numbers have been erased by the Episcopal Church] had Jeremiah write “adonay,” which could be translated as a lower-case “lord.” 

Because it has been presented as “Lord,” I have restored the original Hebrew.  It must be understood that the naming of Yahweh is a statement of a direct, personal relationship with Him.  To call Him “Lord” is a statement that one believes in God, but has never known Him.  When Yahweh becomes one’s “lord,” then one will cal that inner presence one’s “lord.”

Because this song of lament is sixty-six verses long, which is twenty-two sets of three verses, each set associated with a letter of the Hebrew alphabet, the missing two verses that lead to verse 21 need to be seen.  They are translated by the NRSV as such:

          19  The thought of my affliction and my homelessness is wormwood and gall!

20  My soul continually thinks of it and is bowed down within me.

In the Hebrew text, the word translated as “my soul” is written last in verse 20, rather than first, as the translation shows.  The literal translation of this verse says, “remember remember, to sink down low within my soul,” where “zā·ḵō·wr tiz·kō·wr” is repeating the word “zakar,” meaning “remember.”  This double statement reflects back on the use of “zə·ḵār-‘ā·nə·yî” in verse 19, which literally translates as “remember my poverty.”  Those memories are of “roaming, restlessness, straying” [from “ū·mə·rū·ḏî”], such that the “wormwood and gall” are the bad experiences of past sins remembered. 

By realizing that the three verses of the Zayin set all speak of memories of when a “soul strayed” away from Yahweh, one can see how verse 21 then sets up the following triplets, by saying, “This I call to mind, and therefore I have hope.”  The colon mark is not part of the text, as all triplets end with the Hebrew letter samech [ס], which is “used to mark the end of a setumah” – a closed section [“parashah”].  Thus, “I have hope” has to be seen as Jeremiah having his soul given a promise of a future beyond the material realm, where “hope” equates with “salvation,” where “salvation” is dependent on fulfilling a promise made by a soul in return.  That “hope” then comes from a soul marrying Yahweh and rising from “poverty” and “affliction” to the ability to withstand the present pains, because of the faith found in a promise.

The essence of a colon can be seen as why the Episcopal Church cut off the two verses that talk of the necessity of having sunk as low as a soul can sink, which is what leads a soul to beg for mercy and find the hand of Yahweh offering salvation, in exchange for becoming His wife and subject.  They only want to focus on the ‘rebound’ that comes from “hope,” without placing focus on the sin that must be forever sacrificed, in order to gain “hope.”  As the next triplet delves into that “mercy,” they are simply using one verse to set that up, rather than three.

Verse twenty-two then begins the triplet under the letter Chet [ח].  The NRSV translation shows, “The steadfast love of Yahweh never ceases, his mercies never come to an end,” where I have replaced their use of “the Lord” with the truth written.  The translation shown is not what is stated, as the literal translation says, “the mercies Yahweh that not finished  that not accomplished his compassions  .”  There is nothing written about “love,” although “compassions” can lead one to think that is the intent.  The Hebrew words “ṯā·mə·nū” and “ḵā·lū” are similar, as both can mean “completion” or “finished.”  The word “kalah” expands that to “at an end, accomplished, or spent.”  This then says the “goodness” or “kindness” of Yahweh are not “finished,” after those “mercies” have been extended to a soul that has been redeemed through divine marriage.  Likewise, that “goodness” and “kindness” will continue, as they will not reach “an end,” because Yahweh’s “compassions” will forever remain with a soul in marriage.  Therefore, to intuit “love” from this means the shared “love” of a Husband and a wife.

The middle verse of this threesome then is translated by the NRSV to say, “they are new every morning; great is your faithfulness.”  While this gives the impression that “his mercies never come to an end,” such that “they” infers a soul can sin and sin some more, with Yahweh always extending “new” forgivenesses” every morning,” this is an absurdity.  The omitted verse that tell of how low a soul went, before Yahweh was begged to save it, says the “endlessness” is the commitment a soul makes to receive the “goodness” of Yahweh.  The word “goodness” is the opposite of “sinful,” so that which is “new” is the life led by a soul.  The element of “morning” is when a new light of truth has come, removing a soul from darkness.  The aspect of “faithfulness” says the soul and Yahweh both keep their commitments in marriage, with the intimate presence of a soul merged with the Spirit of Yahweh brings true faith to a soul, which is “steadfast, firm, and true.”

The final verse of the Chet segment is then said by the NRSV to say, “Yahweh is my portion,” says my soul, “therefore I will hope in him.”  Here the word “hope” is found, which matches the usage in verse twenty-one [“’ō·w·ḥîl”].  The literal translation has this verse begin with “my portion,” which is a statement about a soul’s “share” of the commitment that reflects “faithfulness.”  That “portion” then says “Yahweh speaks my soul,” which says one’s commitment is then to do what Yahweh says to do, in order for that soul to remain saved.  This is not unwilling force, but desires actions, where the “hope” of one’s “soul” is to be told what to do, to please Yahweh.  With “hope” explained, this triplet is ended by a “ס.”

Verse twenty-five then begins the triplet under the letter Tet [ט].  The NRSV translation shows, “Yahweh is good to those who wait for him, to the soul that seeks him.”  Again, I have made the necessary change to state that Jeremiah addressed “Yahweh,” not some unknown “Lord.”  Here, the first word places focus on “good, pleasant, agreeable,” which is then attributed to “Yahweh to those who wait for him.”  After verse twenty-four spoke of one’s “hope” to do one’s “share,” the aspect of waiting now says one does not act independently of Yahweh.  Simply from having been graced with a desire to do “good,” one only does what Yahweh leads one to do.  In that regard there is the element of “patience” that one learns as a wife of Yahweh, whereas impatience was the impetus to sin before divine marriage.  Again, this is “soul” motivated, whereas before it was the flesh leading the soul into slavery to self.  One learns what would please Yahweh – one’s holy Husband – so one “seeks” to do “pleasing” acts in the name of Yahweh [as a wife].

The middle verse in this set is then translated by the NRSV to say, “It is good that one should wait quietly for the salvation of Yahweh.”  Once again, the name Yahweh is written, but bastardized by translation.  In two consecutive verses Jeremiah began with the word “towb,” where the focus in on “good, agreeable, pleasant.”  Here, the element of “waiting” is translated, but that missing from the translation is the “anxious longing” that comes, when “hoping” to receive a direct command from Yahweh.  The Hebrew word written, “chuwl,” implies a desire to ‘dance, writhe, or whirl,” because one’s soul wants so much to please the Holy Husband.  It is this inner sensation that is the delight held by a soul, not the flesh, so it is “silent” and “quiet.”  It comes from the promise of “salvation” to come, so the soul feels much like a child as Christmas or a birthday nears and there is a sensation of delight that cannot be made to come faster by speaking of it.

The third verse is this set is then said to say, “It is good for one to bear the yoke in youth,” where one more time Jeremiah began with the word “towb.” 

Here, it is “good, pleasant, agreeable” for an adult use self-restraint.  The Hebrew word “geber” means “man,” but it becomes asexual as “warrior.”  Because “men” and “women” struggle with self-restraints ordinarily, as wife of Yahweh becomes a “warrior” that is in a constant war against the lures of the world.  In the silence of patient time, it is easy to become distracted; and when the inner urges are feeling like one is anxious, it demands one who is trained to wear the “yoke” of responsibility and “carry” or “bear” the commitment that is the Law [one’s marriage vows to Yahweh].  Thus, the anticipation of a “youth” or one’s “early life” before divine marriage, must be set aside and managed, because of the promise of salvation.  This set is then ended by the Samech letter [ס].

The Yod [י] triplet is begun by verse twenty-eight said to say, “to sit alone in silence when he has imposed it.”  Here, the insertion of “the Lord” has been removed and replaced with the third person pronoun “he,” as Jeremiah did not specifically name Yahweh.  Rather than simply read this verse as saying, “to sit along in silence,” the literal translation can equate to an intent that says, “let him dwell isolated without external influence.”  This becomes typical of the Jewish isolation from Gentiles, not from seeing Gentiles as inferior human beings [they all are souls inhabiting flesh], but from seeing an incompatibility in beliefs keeps one adhering to Mosaic Law less likely to stray from that law, if one “dwells” amid others of like mind.  In that, the inference coming from “nā·ṭal,” as “has imposed” or “has lifted” or “has born” by God, that ‘higher bar set’ is the Law brought down by Moses, which must be followed [“born”] without fail.

Verse twenty-nine than adds a second verse that begins with the condition saying, “let him.”  From “let him dwell” we are led to “let him put” or “let him give.”  The NRSV translates this verse as, “to put one’s mouth to the dust (there may yet be hope),” where there is nothing written that would place words in parentheses.  To read “let him set in the earth” the inference is to be planted, where the addition of “his mouth” is less about ‘eating dust and more about a soul married to Yahweh becoming His voice place into the world.  It is from planting apostles and prophets into the land that others can be led to also marry Yahweh.  This extends the “hope” of one soul to “hope” for many souls.

The thirtieth and third verse in this set is then translated to say, “to give one’s cheek to the smiter, and be filled with insults.”  In this, there is a repeating of “yit·tên” as the initial focus, such that “let him put” or “let him give” is again the lead to the word translated simply as “smiter.”  The Hebrew word “lə·mak·kê·hū” stems from “nakah,” which translates as “to the one who strikes him.”  This becomes a reflection of an “attacker,” who must then be seen as either a Gentile [enemy of the Judeans, such as the Babylonians] or another Judean [friend or neighbor that disapproved with one’s refusal to be influenced to sin].  Thus, Jeremiah said the same as Jesus, as far as turning the other “cheek.”  In effect, Jeremiah adding “be satisfied with disgrace” means the same as Jesus said. 

When one is the “mouth” of Yahweh “on earth,” then persecution is an expectation.  This releases one to try and isolate oneself from direct confrontations with enemies and neighbors.  However, to correct a neighbor who has disgraced himself or herself by letting him or her know he or she has broken a Law, might cause him or her strike back in anger.  Jeremiah wrote before the system of Judaism that return to Jerusalem after the exile; so, the ordinary Jew was less likely to strike back without legal repercussions.  Still, the “full disgrace speaks as a double-edge sword.  If one has indeed erred and someone slaps a cheek, then one must offer the other cheek as thanks for having been corrected.  On the other hand, if one is slapped wrongly, then offer the “full disgrace” of a sinner, so he or she will strike in anger again, making the error of their ways more known to their souls later.

After verse 30 ended with a ס letter, verse thirty-one begins the last triplet of this reading.  The NRSV translates it to say, “ For adonay will not reject forever.”  Here, the mistranslation of “’ă·ḏō·nāy” as “the Lord” has been totally misunderstood [by Jews and Gentiles – Christians – alike].  When verse thirty is realized to work two ways, the use of “adonay” likewise works two ways.  As “lord” of one’s soul-flesh being, the one who strikes in anger is “lorded” by self-will or [worse] evil demons.  One whose soul has married Yahweh has Him as one’s “lord,” thorough the Spirit of Yahweh [which is not Yahweh directly].  Christians have the resurrection of Jesus’ soul with a host soul as this “lord,” which in Greek can be called “Lord,” but only as a title for that Jesus name within.  Therefore, verse thirty-one says that even sins will not forbid a soul from being “rejected forever” or “cast off forever.”  One casts oneself away from Yahweh, such that the freedom to strike twice will make that evil deed [sin] sink in and turn one back to Yahweh for salvation.

Verse thirty-two then says, “ Although he causes grief, he will have compassion     according to the abundance of his steadfast love” [NRSV].  Here, again, the use of “compassion” is mistaken as some human sense of “love,” like a mother forgiving her child’s sin, without punishment and calling that “love.”  This verse literally begins by saying, “for though he causes grief,” such that “suffering” is a clear statement about punishment, it is that punishment that Jeremiah knew was the depths a soul could sink from having sinned.  Without the ‘suffering” and “grief,” then no soul would ever turn away from sin.  This, again, is relative to letting a sinner strike the other cheek, in “full disgrace.”  That disgrace will bring about a complete lack of “love” from Yahweh – the Father.  Therefore, the “compassion shown” by Yahweh will be to always welcome back a lost soul into His fold.  That “compassion” comes with an agreement that cannot ever be broken.

The translation of “abundance” is misleading, as it again misleads one to think that the same soul can be forgiven countless times.  The better translation says “multitude,” which is relative to the Judeans in exile, the reason for Jeremiah’s lament to Yahweh.  Each and every repentant sinner, all of whom were severely punished for their sins, will be welcomed back by Yahweh, “according to” how the “multitude” agrees to divine marriage.  This led Jeremiah to bracket “his mercies,” which actually means “his goodness,” such that the “abundance of compassion” is based on who decides to receive “goodness” into their souls.

The final verse in this reading is then said to state, “for he does not willingly afflict  or grieve anyone.”  Each of these last three verses has begun with the Hebrew word “,” which means “for.”  In this, “for” is followed by “not he does afflict the soul.”  The Hebrew word “mil·lib·bōw” stems from “leb,” which means “inner man, mind, will, heart,” such that “willingly” is a statement about the Spirit of Yahweh not taking delight or pleasure from punishing the wicked.  No matter how bad a human body might feel pain and agony [the story of Job], a soul is never harmed or hurt in any way.  A lifetime of physical pain is nothing more than a fleeting memory to a soul.  Therefore, all punishment seen as Yahweh bringing pain to a sinner is an illusion, because all physical pain and suffering is one’s own soul’s damage done to its body of flesh [unless one is Job, the exception to this rule]; so, Yahweh repairs the damage a soul has done to itself, when one realizes the error of sinful ways.

As an optional reading that is the Track 2 response to the Wisdom of Solomon reading, it is clear to see that Yahweh did not Create in order to destroy.  Jeremiah agrees with that insight by saying the only source for destruction comes from a soul that reject Yahweh in marriage.  The omitted verses that tell of the depths of despair a soul can fall into, due to self-caused punishments, is why Yahweh is so compassionate and forgiving.   A soul have been given life in the material world for the purpose of hearing the whispers that call it to return and be one with God.  Religion has been Yahweh’s gift to the world; but Satan has distorted that gift by using trick of deceit to make those whispers harder to listen to,  The message of Jeremiah’s lament says “hope” for salvation is the key to finding Yahweh, after becoming lost.

Wisdom of Solomon 1:13-15; 2:23-24 – Righteousness is immortal

God did not make death,

And he does not delight in the death of the living.

For he created all things so that they might exist;

the generative forces of the world are wholesome,

and there is no destructive poison in them,

and the dominion of Hades is not on earth.

For righteousness is immortal.

God created us for incorruption,

and made us in the image of his own eternity,

but through the devil’s envy death entered the world,

and those who belong to his company experience it.

——————————————————————————–

This is an optional Old Testament selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for the Sixth Sunday after Pentecost, Year B 2018. In the numbering system that lists each Sunday in an ordinal fashion, this Sunday is referred to as Proper 8. If chosen, this will next be read aloud in church by a reader on Sunday, July 1, 2018. It is important because it states the wisdom that human beings – souls in bodies – are born for eternal life. If not for the lures of sin, everyone on earth would personally know God.

It should be recognized that this reading selection comes from an Apocryphal book, which means it is a “Hidden” text that is not officially part of the Christian Bible. As a work that has been denied free access with those deemed most holy, without doubt, it has been scrutinized by scholars “after the fact,” searching for clues of authorship. As such, it has been determined that this is not a work written by King Solomon, and is not thought to have been written by only one human being. This focus on perceived flaws is not how one should address this book, and thus this reading.

The assumption that must be made is that Solomon, who as a child asked God for the gift of wisdom, was granted that wish by God; but Solomon was never the author of any wisdom he spoke.

All wisdom comes from God, flowing through one who is committed in their hearts to receive God’s thoughts. Therefore, the “Wisdom of Solomon” is from the same source, whether it flowed through a king of Israel, or a Prophet of the LORD before or after the fall of Israel and Judah, or an Apostle of Jesus Christ while being tested in the wilderness.

Wisdom exceeds the bounds of knowledge that humans can master, as it accepts the unknown readily, understanding what had been hidden from sight. Experience become the foresight of the future, from a clarity generated by hindsight.

When this view is understood, God is known to be the author.   With God accepted as the author, the test of that authorship is the truth. Each line of prose or poetry must pass this test. Regardless of who wrote the words down on parchment, the truth they expose is the proof that God is the source of all wisdom and knowledge.

This selected reading consists of five verses, three from chapter one and two from chapter two. From two arcs on a circle one circuit of thought is connected.  The first verse (verse 13) states (according to the King James Version): “For God made not death: neither hath he pleasure in the destruction of the living.” The presence of a colon (rather than a comma) makes the second half of this statement be supporting details to the initial statement that “God made not death.”

This points out that God is the Creator, not a destroyer.

Samael – Poison of God, the destroyer.

God brought forth life into nothingness. Death is not an intention of Creation.

Transition is a state of change in life. The scientific-philosophical mind believes that since Creation there has been no new matter created and no original matter lost. All that was then is now and will be forever, with everything in between merely the natural states of change and transition. Therefore, the “death of the living” has nothing to do with the material universe, as it refers to souls.

In verse 14 we read, “For he created all things so that they might exist; the generative forces of the world are wholesome, and there is no destructive poison in them, and the dominion of Hades is not on earth.” This states that all things are designed to go through changes.

There are seasonal fluctuations, where growth and recession are natural. There are the global transitions, where tectonic plates move, volcanoes eject the inner earth onto the surface and sedimentary formations are from natural growth and rebirth cycles over ages. The temperature changes brings ice ages and global warming, where oceans rise and fall, and rivers, lakes, and streams go from dry to overflowing. All of this is normal life. What appears to be destructive is natural transformation.

The souls of human beings are given creation amid this flux, where changes from one body to the next are as natural as flowers blooming and then wilting away. Hell, which destroys souls, is not part of this world created by God.

When verse 15 then states, “For righteousness is immortal,” the purpose of life is to find righteousness. Righteousness is beyond wholesome. Righteousness is the creation of God within one who rejects the destructive poisons planted by Satan. Righteousness is the human soul’s choice to make, by choosing God over Satan. The reward of righteousness is everlasting life with God.

In the leap to the last two verses of chapter two, the King James Version shows “immortal” being the translation, rather than “incorruption.” As such, it is written in verse 23: “God created man to be immortal, and made him (man) to be an image of his own eternity.”

“Us” is “man,” such that it is written in Genesis, “Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness,” (Genesis 1:26) where the LORD of lords (YHWH elohim), the God who made the gods (“In the beginning [YHWH] created gods [elohim] – Genesis 1:1) is the One God from which all Creation of souls (immortal souls and mortal with immortal souls) come.

More than being in the image of God by having a head, two arms and two legs – all attached to a trunk – the image of God (and gods) is that of the immortality of a soul. A soul cannot be corrupted by death. However, a body with a soul can be corrupted, leading the soul pay for that corruption.

In the final verse of chapter two, which says, “but through the devil’s envy death entered the world, and those who belong to his company experience it,” the corruption of a body with a soul is due to Satan’s envy of mankind. This verse tells of the division in Heaven between the “elohim” of the “gods.” Those of “his company” are the angels that rebelled against God’s command to serve mankind. These were cast within the earth, which makes them like Man, as eternal souls trapped in bodies. However, there is no release from those bodies as those souls are death.

Throw upon him hurled and pointed stones, covering him with darkness;
There shall he remain for ever; cover his face, that he may not see the light.
And in the great day of judgment let him be cast into the fire.
(1 Enoch 7-9)

As an optional reading for the sixth Sunday after Pentecost, when one’s personal ministry should be underway, this wisdom speaks of the lure away from eternal life and towards the trapping of the devil. It is the envy of Satan, brought on because God made Man as wholesome and immortal, that makes Satan thrive on misleading humankind away from its promise.  As long as Man’s soul remains uncorrupted, Satan will continue to whisper, “God will still take you in Heaven if you only do this sin. God is forgiving.”

That lure is heard because one has not sacrificed the self for the protection of Jesus Christ within one’s soul. A human soul is too wholesome to not be tricked without that care from the Holy Spirit, which can only come from a total commitment to God (marriage).  This is the lesson from Genesis of Eve being deceived by the serpent and Adam following along.  Their human forms with eternal souls were separate from God’s presence.

Ministry means having made that sacrifice, so one speaks from knowledge of faith and can guide others to the same protection and reward of eternal life with God. Ministry means opening the eyes and the ears of human bodies holding souls, so they can know the truth. Ministry means speaking the Wisdom of Solomon. Otherwise, the lies of Satan will lead soul after soul to corruption.

2 Corinthians 8:7-15 – Eagerness to serve God

As you excel in everything– in faith, in speech, in knowledge, in utmost eagerness, and in our love for you– so we want you to excel also in this generous undertaking.

I do not say this as a command, but I am testing the genuineness of your love against the earnestness of others. For you know the generous act of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, so that by his poverty you might become rich. And in this matter I am giving my advice: it is appropriate for you who began last year not only to do something but even to desire to do something– now finish doing it, so that your eagerness may be matched by completing it according to your means. For if the eagerness is there, the gift is acceptable according to what one has– not according to what one does not have. I do not mean that there should be relief for others and pressure on you, but it is a question of a fair balance between your present abundance and their need, so that their abundance may be for your need, in order that there may be a fair balance. As it is written,

“The one who had much did not have too much,
and the one who had little did not have too little.”

——————————————————————————–

This is the Epistle selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for the Sixth Sunday after Pentecost, Year B 2018. In the numbering system that lists each Sunday in an ordinal fashion, this Sunday is referred to as Proper 8. This will next be read aloud in church by a reader on Sunday, July 1, 2018. It is important because Paul delves into the benefits of having received the Holy Spirit and become one with Jesus Christ.

In verse 7, the Greek word translated as “you excel” is “perisseuete.” The root verb, “perisseuó,” more readily states, “I exceed the ordinary (the necessary), abound, overflow; am left over,” which makes “excel” an acceptable substitute. However, “excel” can be read as a form of personal achievement, brought about by natural talents and a devotion to perfect one’s mastering of some desired action; but this personal achievement cannot be read into this word penned by Paul.

To read the intent as Paul stating to the Christians of Corinth as him stating, “You exceed the ordinary in everything,” the explanation is then the gifts that have been allowed them all by God. The level of “excellence” Paul knew the Corinthians displayed was the same as that coming from the talents that God gives to all His Apostles. Therefore, he could list them specifically as 1.) Faith; 2.) Speech; 3.) Knowledge; and 4.) Eagerness (as far as this translation allows one to see).

In the Greek written, the end of this list states, “and in the (ones)  from us to you  love  that also  in this the grace  you should abound.” The presence of marks of pause and reflection (commas) then makes it possible to add to the list: 5.) A brotherhood of Saints; 6.) God’s love; and 7.) The gift of the presence of Jesus Christ.

The Greek word written, “chariti” (like “charity”), means “grace, favor, kindness,” where its use in the New Testament implied such “grace” “as a gift or blessing brought to man by Jesus Christ, (b) favor, (c) gratitude, thanks, (d) a favor, kindness.” It is this “grace” or “favor” that binds one Apostle to all Apostles in the brotherhood of Jesus Christ, where all Apostles (males and females He made them) are reborn Sons of God. The unity that binds is God’slove, and this union is not from practice, desire, or aptitude that is achieved through personal will, as it is only possible as a gift of God. This list of Paul is, therefore, the rewards of one’s soul being married to God through the cleansing of the Holy Spirit, all of which is gained after the dowry of marriage has been paid in full –the sacrifice of one’s self will in obedience and submission to God’s Will.

The next verse does not state that Paul was “testing the genuineness of your love against the eagerness of others,” but instead Paul wrote from afar, with the personal experience of a true Christian. This means he admitted he was not commanding anything of the Corinthians, but simply stating some facts that become apparent through the Mind of Christ. This Mind knew the “eagerness” of all Apostles to please God.  As such, Paul was stating how he knew this love of God within the Christians of Corinth would prove itself as genuine, through their acceptance of new disciples, just as Paul had accepted them. Less than a “testing” by Paul, the presence of Jesus Christ within the Corinthians would be “proving the genuineness of their love” to others.

Paul then stated, “You know indeed the grace of the Lord of us Jesus Christ,” which stated the Christians of Corinth, just like the Christian Paul and his Apostle companions, knew the presence of Jesus Christ was one with their beings, due to “the grace” (“charin”) Jesus Christ brought them as their personal “Lord.” That presence is sent upon all of God’s lovers in marriage, because God will accept no less than perfection in His brides (males and females He marries His brides). That presence of Jesus Christ as the Lord of an Apostle is “for the sake of them,” due to their human actions of devotion and commitment to God.

When we read the translation above that says, “That though [Jesus Christ] was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor,” the meaning is an Apostle, as a human being, is impoverished by sin. To cleanse a soul of sin, one must sacrifice the self-ego, which then leaves a human body with only a soul. The riches of the world have been turned aside, placing one into a vow of poverty. This is the dowry a human being must make in order to accept the proposal of marriage with God. Therefore, when one has become poor, then Jesus Christ comes from the richness of Heaven, entering the soul of the cleansed.

When Paul then finished this thought by writing, “so that by [Jesus Christ’s] poverty you might become rich,” this says that the coming of Jesus Christ within one’s being is so one can “become rich.” These riches are not measured in material means, but in Spiritual gifts: faith, speech, knowledge, eagerness, brotherhood, love, and the presence of Jesus Christ as one’s identity.

Still, Paul added his advice to the Corinthians, about this presence of Jesus Christ within, and how their vows of poverty could be “profitable for you” (“hymin sympherei”). The translation above – “for you who began last year not only to do something but even to desire to do something” – misses the point Paul made about “thelein,” which is a direct statement about the sacrifice made a year ago, which was that of personal “will, wish, desire, intend, and design.” Instead of Paul referencing the Corinthians’ “desire to do something,” as if he made a suggestion to rekindle their personal egos, but he instead advised they “now finish doing it.” The Greek word written, “epitelesate,” means Paul recommended the Corinthians “complete, accomplish, and/or perfect” their submission to God’s Will.

Paul then explained this “completion” by writing, “so even as there was readiness to the will [of God to submit to], so also the [readiness] to complete.” He then continued by saying, “if indeed the readiness is present, as if he might have acceptable, not as not he does not have.” The translation above says this as, “For if the eagerness is there, the gift is acceptable according to what one has– not according to what one does not have.” The meaning is to submit completely to the Will of God, without question and without any personal desire for more gifts of God, seemingly brought on by the eagerness to serve God, but in reality as a personal quest to be ranking higher among the men of God. A total commitment does not keep up with what other talents other Apostles possess. A total commitment to God releases all personal desires and accepts what God allows.

The translation above that states, “I do not mean that there should be relief for others and pressure on you,” the focus is on one feeling pains by not being able to help another, due to the limitations of God’s gifts bestowed. An Apostle is still feeling personal ego pains when they feel such pressure to perform as self, rather than as Jesus Christ reborn. The literal statement coming from the Greek words written by Paul say, “not indeed to others ease, but for you affliction; but of equality,” where “isotētos” means, “equality, equality of treatment, and fairness.” One still bearing the weight of self-ego is equal to the one who has yet to sacrifice his or hers, such that one is attracted to another for the purpose of seeing one’s shortcomings before God, more than being able to see one’s self as God on earth.

This makes the advice of Paul to the Corinthians to be a recommendation to further their commitment to God, rather than as a way to see the inequalities among the Apostles as a measurement of one’s piety before God. One must thank God for all His generosities and see His equal treatment of all His wives (males and females He takes human wives). Anything less than seeing this means more self-sacrifice is required.

This is the purpose behind Paul writing, as translated above, “it is a question of a fair balance between your present abundance and their need, so that their abundance may be for your need, in order that there may be a fair balance.” This is then based on “the present time” (“en tō nyn”) of the epistle’s writing, which is always the “time” of relevance, where one’s personal “abundance” from God, to meet the needs of others, is always relative to the needs of others being to a reflection of one’s own needs, where the equality exposed is in how one retains the sins of the world, rather than release them through completion of sacrifice.

The issue of equality is then found in Paul quoting from Exodus 16:18, stating, “The one who had much did not have too much, and the one who had little did not have too little.” This is relative to the gathering of manna that was sent by God and the instructions given to the Israelites by Moses. This quote by Paul is then reference to the surrounding story in Exodus 16, where we read:

———————————————————————–

“Moses said to them, “It is the bread the Lord has given you to eat. This is what the Lord has commanded: ‘Everyone is to gather as much as they need. Take an omer for each person you have in your tent.’”

The Israelites did as they were told; some gathered much, some little. And when they measured it by the omer, the one who gathered much did not have too much, and the one who gathered little did not have too little. Everyone had gathered just as much as they needed.

Then Moses said to them, “No one is to keep any of it until morning.”

However, some of them paid no attention to Moses; they kept part of it until morning, but it was full of maggots and began to smell. So Moses was angry with them.”  (Exodus 16:15b-20)

———————————————————————-

This then becomes applicable to the talents and gifts of the Holy Spirit, as sent to God’s wives just as God sent manna to the Israelites.

Paul was recommending that the Apostles in Corinth see the value of being given the food of Jesus Christ, which is sent to be gathered in portions and measurements that equate to those who will be fed by it. All that comes through the Holy Spirit is to be used. None can be wasted. The only waste is found in those who still retain self-ego and seek more than needed.

As an epistle selection for the sixth Sunday after Pentecost, when one’s personal ministry for God should be underway, this tells one the talents one should already possess: faith that peaks from personal experience in Jesus Christ; the ability to speak in tongues and explain Scripture; the knowledge that comes from the Christ Mind; the eagerness to serve God as Jesus Christ; the need for a brotherhood of Saints in a true Church of Christ; the love of God that confesses one’s soul has been married to God via the Holy Spirit; and the grace of having become Jesus Christ reborn from above. Those characteristics define all ministers of God, which deems them Apostles and Saints.

Still, this message tells all who have submitted to the Will of God not to retain even the slightest sense of self-worth, as all value one has comes from God. It is not up to oneself to determine what one needs, in order to serve others. One serves God, not others; so God will send you what you need and no more. This means a new minister for God still needs to search one’s soul for how one can give more to serve God.

In a ministry for the LORD, one will attract those who one should feed. The nourishment God gives is the Word of Jesus Christ. The Scriptures then act as the body of Christ and is the manna from Heaven. One gathers what is needed daily, with the day before the Sabbath being the only time more than one’s day’s food is necessary to gather. A minister to the LORD feeds those sent to him or her the meaning of God’s Word, until they are matured and can gather their own manna from Heaven.

A minister sees equality in the sins of the world, not in the talents of the Holy Spirit. This means one cannot pass judgment on sinners, as one is also a sinner without being married to God. Therefore, all who profess to point out sinners in the name of Jesus Christ are those who have gathered too much, with their words full of maggot and stinking to high hell.

A minister for the LORD sees the sins of the world reflected upon his or herself.  That sin is not to be condemned or one condemns one’s marriage to God and the rebirth of Jesus Christ.  One forgives the sins of others by repentance before God and Christ.  This makes ministry for the LORD the service of caring for other Apostles, so they do not mistakenly judge others wrongly.

Mark 5:21-43 – Your faith has saved you

When Jesus had crossed again in the boat to the other side, a great crowd gathered around him; and he was by the sea. Then one of the leaders of the synagogue named Jairus came and, when he saw him, fell at his feet and begged him repeatedly, “My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well, and live.” So he went with him.

And a large crowd followed him and pressed in on him. Now there was a woman who had been suffering from hemorrhages for twelve years. She had endured much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had; and she was no better, but rather grew worse. She had heard about Jesus, and came up behind him in the crowd and touched his cloak, for she said, “If I but touch his clothes, I will be made well.” Immediately her hemorrhage stopped; and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease. Immediately aware that power had gone forth from him, Jesus turned about in the crowd and said, “Who touched my clothes?” And his disciples said to him, “You see the crowd pressing in on you; how can you say, ‘Who touched me?’” He looked all around to see who had done it. But the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came in fear and trembling, fell down before him, and told him the whole truth. He said to her, “Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace, and be healed of your disease.”

While he was still speaking, some people came from the leader’s house to say, “Your daughter is dead. Why trouble the teacher any further?” But overhearing what they said, Jesus said to the leader of the synagogue, “Do not fear, only believe.” He allowed no one to follow him except Peter, James, and John, the brother of James. When they came to the house of the leader of the synagogue, he saw a commotion, people weeping and wailing loudly. When he had entered, he said to them, “Why do you make a commotion and weep? The child is not dead but sleeping.” And they laughed at him. Then he put them all outside, and took the child’s father and mother and those who were with him, and went in where the child was. He took her by the hand and said to her, “Talitha cum,” which means, “Little girl, get up!” And immediately the girl got up and began to walk about (she was twelve years of age). At this they were overcome with amazement. He strictly ordered them that no one should know this, and told them to give her something to eat.

——————————————————————————–

This is the Gospel selection from the Episcopal Lectionary for the Sixth Sunday after Pentecost, Year B 2018. In the numbering system that lists each Sunday in an ordinal fashion, this Sunday is referred to as Proper 8. This will next be read aloud in church by a priest on Sunday, July 1, 2018. It is important because it tells how faith is the power that heals, in more ways than one.

In this Gospel reading selection there are two healings. One is planned and one seems accidental. One is the daughter of a named man, Jairus, and the other is an unnamed woman. One character is a leader of the synagogue, while the other is a follower in the crowd. This contrast shows that faith is the common denominator linking both healings, not one’s position or standing in the world.

In other readings prior, the stories have mentioned Jesus traveling by boat across the Sea of Galilee. We read here that “Jesus had crossed again,” which means “the other side” was across from Capernaum. While it does not state the day of the week this travel by boat occurred, it becomes likely that Jesus, as a rabbi or teacher, set up his synagogue to be not a building, but the grassy land by the sea. This would accommodate Sabbath services, without conflict, if Jesus welcomed gatherings regularly when travel was permitted.  In an open space Jesus could teach the meaning of the written text (from divine memory) and address the meaning with the crowd of Jewish followers, who would not be intimidated to speak by Pharisees and envoys of the Temple.

By looking at this map above, which lists the places of harbors and anchorages of ancient Roman times, and realizing the need for a harbor to dock a large fishing boat of the type in which Jesus traveled, one can then see how Jesus chose a site of meeting that was not in Galilee. In the map above, one sees the land along the sea was in Gaulantios or Gaulanitis. That land was under the tetrarchy of Philip (Herod Philip II), the half-brother of Herod Antipas, who ruled Galilee and Perea. Samaria and Judea (to the south) were under the governorship of Pilate. Further to the south where Jesus sailed, Hippos was one of the ten autonomous cities in the region known as Decapolis. This means Jesus sought a place that was not where the Romans were openly persecuting the Jews and where the Temple in Jerusalem had little influence.

The element of Jewish cities can be seen in the listing of Bethsaida, Capernaum, and Magdala as places where synagogues would have naturally been. This map below shows how Bethsaida becomes the likeliest place from where Jairus would have been a leader of a synagogue. The crowd of people would have known where Jesus would preach, so they would have left from Capernaum, traveling through Bethsaida, where others would join the trek.   The distance from Capernaum to Bethsaida is about 6 miles, and it was about that much distance from Bethsaida to the place of meeting (near a harbor). These distances would indicate Jesus met to preach on days other than the Sabbath, which could indicate Sunday sermons; and Jairus could have easily made it there in time to bring Jesus back quickly (within 4 hours total).

When we read that Jairus was “a leader of the synagogue,” it is important to know what that means. According to the meaning associated with the Greek word “archisynagōgōn” (“rulers of synagogue,” in the plural number), Thayer’s Greek Lexicon says of “archisunagógos”, “It was his duty to select the readers or teachers in the synagogue, to examine the discourses of the public speakers, and to see that all things were done with decency and in accordance with ancestral usage.” This means that Jairus had previously chosen Jesus as the teacher for Sabbath service.

Because we know that Simon-Peter, his brother Andrew, and Philip were disciples of Jesus from Bethsaida, it makes sense that Jairus was an elder of their synagogue. Jairus knew the healing power of Jesus from having witnessed it, perhaps when Jesus told the man with a withered hand to “stretch out your hand.” All of this would explain how Jairus knew where to go find Jesus, when his focus was on the health of his daughter.

It is also important to know the meaning of the name Jairus, as named characters in the Gospels are not to have their name’s meaning overlooked. According to the Abarim Publications website, “Jairus” means: “He Enlightens, One Giving Light, He Will Diffuse Light, He Will Enlighten.” This meaning can imply “Jehovah Enlightens,” although there is nothing in the lettering of the name that states “Jehovah.” The name’s meaning is rooted in the Hebrew verb “jair” (אור), which means, “To be light, to give light, to shine.”

This name meaning should then be applied to the character of Jairus, as it shows he was a man who appreciated the truth of the sacred Hebrew texts and sought to shine the light of that truth onto the members of the synagogue he oversaw. He, therefore, recognized the truth and light that Jesus brought into the world, which led him to believe in Jesus as having been sent from God.  Because Jairus sought out Jesus at a time of utmost need, one should assume that Jesus and Jairus had a good working relationship.

When we read how Jairus came to Jesus and “fell at his feet and begged him repeatedly, “My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well, and live,” this was a plea from a trusting friend and associate, more than being a demand or test from an elder prostrating himself before one who was proposing to be holy. While some Pharisees would scorn Jesus by demanding he prove his piety, even under the pretense of trying to trick Jesus, this plea by Jairus shows sincerity.  That emotional plea for help was made from the heart of Jairus, for love of his little daughter and faith in God that he would be led to the true Son of God for salvation.

This should then be seen as why Jesus dropped everything relative to addressing a crowd of nameless Jews and went with Jairus. He went to save his little daughter for the glory of God. God enlightened Jairus to seek Jesus, so God could be proved through the Son.  God likewise enlightened Jesus that this was an important call in his ministry.

As Jesus left to follow Jairus home, the crowd did not know why Jesus was leaving the meeting site, so they pressed in close to follow him. This is where the story exposes a woman who is among the crowd. We are told that she “had been suffering from hemorrhages for twelve years. She had endured much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had; and she was no better, but rather grew worse.”

The Greek wording, “rhysei haimatos,” says, “a flux [or flow] of blood,” which should be understood as a continual state of menstruation. While not stated, it should be assumed that the woman did not have normal periods upon her maturation from childhood and then began to have feminine problems. I do not see this as a problem experienced by an older woman.  Instead, I feel that she went from childhood’s immaturity to a state that transformed her at puberty.

This naturally occurs around the age of twelve in girls (give or take), so the timing of twelve years means she has not stopped hemorrhaging since she her first period began, meaning she was then twenty-four years of age; and, she had suffered for as long as she was a child, prior to becoming mature.  I sense this because the number of twelve years is stated twice in this reading, which makes that number significant.

The cycle of Jupiter is twelve years. It is thus a period of time that reflects the growth and development of human beings.  Jupiter is also the ruler of religion (the Archer) and faith (the Fish).

One has to grasp how a Jewish woman is deemed to be unclean when she has her period, such that she is banned from the synagogue until her period is over and she has completed the ritual cleansing. This means this particular young woman had been forbidden from partaking of any official lessons and rites other Jews were allowed to attend, and she was unable to be presented as a wife for a husband. She could not have children, making her barren. Her dowry had been spent on doctors who could prescribe nothing to correct her problem, and most likely her family had forced her out on her own, as a rejection of a daughter that had somehow sinned and was being punished by God. By seeing this state of being, it becomes her faith that sought a miracle cure, because she remembered the days of her childhood and the joy she felt being a chosen child of God. Her love of God then drew her to find Jesus.

It should then be realized that this woman’s having been banned from the synagogues, due to being unclean, also forbade her from having contact with a clean Jew. Because her bleeding was contained and mostly secret, she could join with a crowd and be unnoticed. Contact with others who had hidden sins and covered abnormalities made her one more in the crowd of the great unwashed. However, he unclean state forbid her, by Jewish law, from touching one of clean status, especially one who was a teacher of the Jews; but touching the hem of Jesus’ garment was her way around that rule.

We then read, “She had heard about Jesus, and came up behind him in the crowd and touched his cloak, for she said, “If I but touch his clothes, I will be made well.” Immediately her hemorrhage stopped; and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease.” This says that the woman had placed her faith in doctors, giving all the money she had, but her condition had only worsened. She had never seen Jesus before, only hearing others talk about his words and deeds. Her faith led her to believe Jesus was the one sent by God to save her, so she would not directly come and prostrate herself before the feet of Jesus, pleading her case while being unclean. Instead, she would come from behind, hidden in the crowd, and secretly touch one of the knotted fringes of his prayer shawl [Tallit] or his robe or tunic. His body would not be made unclean by personal contact.

When she did this, “Immediately her hemorrhage stopped; and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease.” The Greek word “euthys” means, “immediately, soon, at once, shortly, straightway, directly and forthwith.” There was healing the instant the woman touched Jesus’ outer garment. At that same moment that the woman knew she was healed, Jesus was “immediately aware that power had gone forth from him,” as the same Greek word “euthys” is again written. The woman “felt in her body that she was healed” at the same time Jesus was “aware that power had gone forth,” causing one to be healed.

Knowing “immediately” means Jesus did not have the foresight to heal.  Healing happened with the woman knowing more than Jesus.  The two were instantly joined through faith.  It was that connection that was made between Jesus and the woman that was her touching God with her faith, such that Jesus felt that touch when the power of God passed through him to the woman. Jesus did not know who the power had touched, but he wanted to know who was in the crowd following him that had such faith in God. Therefore, Jesus asked, “Who touched my clothes?”  He asked that question as if he had sensory organs sewn into the fabric of his clothing.

When we read of the disciples replying to Jesus’ question, saying, “You see the crowd pressing in on you; how can you say, ‘Who touched me?’” that meant there was plenty of incidental contact present. That meant Jesus was probably closely surrounded by his disciples, as they cleared a path for him to travel, meaning it was quite probable that one of them had touched Jesus, if not once, then multiple times. If not them, then any number of people in the crowd could have touched Jesus out of their admiration.

Still, Jesus knew there was one whose touch caused God to reward their faith. So, Jesus “looked all around to see who had done it.” His inability to see who it was means Jesus was not the one who purposefully sent out healing power from his being.

We then read that “the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came in fear and trembling, fell down before him, and told him the whole truth.” In this statement, we have a parallel positioning made before Jesus that was made by Jairus. Jairus had done that as a clean Jew, begging Jesus to come save his little daughter. The woman then did it also as a cleaned Jew, whose body had been cleansed by the power of the water that is the Holy Spirit. More than being ritually cleaned, she had been filled with the Holy Spirit of God. Therefore, when Jesus heard her tell “the whole truth,” he said, “Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace, and be healed of your disease,” which was a blessing spoken to the woman by God, through His Son.

When Jesus addressed the woman as “Thygatēr,” “Daughter,” where the capitalization should not be discounted as being merely to denote the first word of a statement, the woman had just been made a Saint. A “Daughter” is then the equivalent to a “Son,” which Jesus of Nazareth was, in relationship to God the Father. The woman had just been announced as one with the same faith as Jesus. The use of the Greek word “sesōken,” translated as “has made you well,” more importantly says, “has saved you, has preserved you, has rescued you,” in more ways than simply being “healed” of a physical disease causing hemorrhaging. She was then sent out into the world with the “peace” of righteousness, which she would spread to all she would come in contact with in the future.

Still, while this title of “Daughter” was bestowed by Jesus to a woman who had been mature for at least twelve years, the dual meaning relates that woman with the “little daughter” of Jairus, who was near death and in need of Jesus’ help. We are told that Jairus’ daughter was twelve years of age, which means as long as she had been alive the woman just saved had been hemorrhaging. Add to that the possibility that the woman began her torment when she too was twelve years of age, then she becomes a reflection of Jairus’ “little daughter.” Both had neared death when they reached puberty.

Like the doctors that took all of the woman’s money, rewarding themselves for her troubles, while giving nothing of value to her in return, Jesus reached Jairus’ house and found the daughter surrounded by people wailing and causing a commotion. While Jairus was a reflection of “enlightenment,” he was surrounded by those who would cloud that light. The people sent to him and who stayed at his home lacked faith. They went to tell Jairus, “Your daughter is dead.” They only saw one diagnosis with no cure.  They laughed at Jesus for being weak of mind.

On the other hand, when Jesus told Jairus, “Do not fear, only believe,” Jairus maintained his faith in Jesus. Thus, when the people in Jairus’ house to whom Jesus said, “The child is not dead but sleeping” laughed, they were told to leave. The clouds that blocked the light were dispersed.  The light of truth was clear to shine.

With the disbelievers away, we read that Jesus “took the child’s father and mother and those who were with him, and went in where the child was.” Those who were with Jesus were his disciples Peter, and James and John of Zebedee. They loved Jesus and had faith in his works. Jairus and his wife loved their daughter and had faith in the works of Jesus as well. Surrounded by those drawn to the light of truth, Jesus took the girl “by the hand and said to her, “Talitha cum,” which means, “Little girl, get up!” And immediately the girl got up and began to walk about.” The girl was only sleeping.

The use of the Greek word “euthys” again appears, such that there was an instant connection made between God and the daughter when the words uttered by Jesus touched her being (her soul’s presence). More than his laying on hands, Jesus spoke the Word of God that healed.

Just as Jesus would say when news reached him across the Jordan that Lazarus had fallen ill, Jesus had said, “Lazarus is only sleeping.” However, when Jesus returned to Bethany, where Lazarus had been dead and buried after four days, the touch of Jesus’ voice to Lazarus’ being, “Come out!” had the same effect. Lazarus also “got up and began to walk about.”  It was the Word that brought Lazarus back to life, just as it was the Word that raised Jairus’ daughter.

The symbolism of sleep-to-death and wake-to-life are seen again in this story. Death is a state of sleeping, whereas life is a state of wakefulness. The soul is the eternal spirit that gives life or death to a body. Life is more than a body that breathes air and death is more than a body that ceases to breathe air. The soul can only remain in a body of flesh that is capable of supporting human life. When the body has reached a point when a body is kept living, but not alive, the soul hovers near the body. This is a state of sleep, in a metaphysical sense. Should God restore the flesh to life, then the soul can return and a sleeping body (one said to have been dead) can again be alive. Therefore, when Jesus touched the hand of the little girl, her flesh was made whole and able to support life.

When Jesus said, “Get up!” speaking for the Father, the soul was rejoined with the rejuvenated body and she rose. This is a rebirth.

This awakening of the soul occurs in each reincarnation, where the Father tells a soul to be reborn anew. In one who has been eternally saved by the Father, the death of the body means the soul “Gets up!” in Heaven, leaving the body of flesh behind. Still, when this little girl got up after she had a body that was once no longer able to support life, just as when Lazarus rose from a longer death (when the ‘silver cord’ connecting the hovering soul to its body is severed after three days dead), and just as Jesus was resurrected after three days dead, she had been reborn for a Spiritual purpose in the worldly domain.

When we then read that Jesus “strictly ordered [the parents and his disciples] that no one should know this, and told [the parents] to give her something to eat,” this was because everyone present in that girl’s room knew she had risen from her deathbed. Jesus knew by the Mind of Christ that telling people, “Jesus raised my little daughter from death” would cause evil to raise its ugly head. A plot to kill Lazarus would surface after news spread that Jesus had raised him. The little daughter needed to be fed Spiritually by her parents to live for God – taught the Word sent by He Who Gives Light.  Therefore, Jairus and his wife and daughter were told to keep this truth within them; and all would do so, as all were made Saints by the presence of the Holy Spirit, which came upon them all due to their faith.

As a selected Gospel reading for the sixth Sunday after Pentecost, when one’s personal ministry to the LORD should be underway, it becomes vital for one’s faith be as strong as was Jairus’ and the woman whose hemorrhaging had kept her faith from being a blessing for others for half her life. One who has faith desires to be in touch with God.  A minister to the LORD must know the value of having died of self, so one can be reborn as an extension of God’s Son, Jesus Christ. The innocence of a child must be returned for one’s faith to be put to use.

We read the request of Jairus, “Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well, and live,” and think Jesus had a healing touch that was a gift of God. However, we never see see how Jesus laid his hands on the woman who was healed. Jesus told her, “Your faith has made you well.” Jesus held the hand of Jairus’ daughter when she got up, but Jesus was not holding the hand of Lazarus when he came from his tomb. It was the voice of God that spoke, commanding their souls to act with faith. Without faith in the one seeking healing, having someone lay on their hands will have the same effect as going to a doctor: you spend all you have and get no better.

The real meaning of the request by Jairus, which was heard by God and known by Jesus, was, “Come and make my daughter be your hands on earth, so that she may be saved and alive with faith.” This is the prayer a minister has to make to God, when one offers him or herself to God as His bride (regardless of one’s human gender). We have to die of self so that our flesh can be renewed in the hands of Jesus Christ.  Jesus must lay his hands within ours, while we step aside as servants to God.

A ministry to the LORD then means that no matter how overcome with amazement one becomes, witnessing the miracles of God that occur around one, one is not to become boastful and proclaim, “Look here at what I have done!” A miracle is a private and personal matter. A miracle uplifts one’s faith.

Still, to God a miracle is just another day’s work done through one of His servants. People of faith simply “Go in peace” to serve the LORD.

Thanks be to God!

2 Samuel 1:1, 17-27 – The Song of the Bow

After the death of Saul, when David had returned from defeating the Amalekites, David remained two days in Ziklag.

David intoned this lamentation over Saul and his son Jonathan. (He ordered that The Song of the Bow be taught to the people of Judah; it is written in the Book of Jashar.) He said:

Your glory, O Israel, lies slain upon your high places!

How the mighty have fallen!

Tell it not in Gath,

proclaim it not in the streets of Ashkelon;

or the daughters of the Philistines will rejoice,

the daughters of the uncircumcised will exult.

You mountains of Gilboa,

let there be no dew or rain upon you,

nor bounteous fields!

For there the shield of the mighty was defiled,

the shield of Saul, anointed with oil no more.

From the blood of the slain,

from the fat of the mighty,

the bow of Jonathan did not turn back,

nor the sword of Saul return empty.

Saul and Jonathan, beloved and lovely!

In life and in death they were not divided;

they were swifter than eagles,

they were stronger than lions.

O daughters of Israel, weep over Saul,

who clothed you with crimson, in luxury,

who put ornaments of gold on your apparel.

How the mighty have fallen

in the midst of the battle!

Jonathan lies slain upon your high places.

I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan;

greatly beloved were you to me;

your love to me was wonderful,

passing the love of women.

How the mighty have fallen,

and the weapons of war perished!

——————–

This is the Track 1 optional Old Testament selection to be read on the sixth Sunday after Pentecost [Proper 8], Year B, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. I wrote and posted much of what will follow, back in 2018. What I wrote then still applies, perhaps now even more. It is important because it tells how it does not matter how great one is or how great the strength of a nation is, because the mighty who are without God will fall.

This is a song written by David after he has learned of the deaths of Saul and his three sons, including his beloved “soul brother” Jonathan. When this is read in a vacuum, without the story that leads up to this song being realized, it can become confusing as to why David would write such a memorial.

It must be realized that Saul had unsuccessfully tried to kill David, letting him flee in hopes that Israel’s enemies would kill him. Rather than that happening, the promise made by Goliath (in his challenge that was eventually taken up by young David), “Choose a man and have him come down to me. If he is able to fight and kill me, we will become your subjects,” (1 Samuel 17:8-9) that was ultimately kept by Achish king of Gath, who feared David.

David (in verse 1 here) was returning to Ziklag (a Philistine city given to him by Achish son of King Maok (of Gath). While he was away, the Amalekites (the equivalent of modern day Bedouin Arabians) had burned the city down and taken all the wives as their spoil. Two of David’s wives were in the number of those taken; so, David found them, and then defeated the Amalekites with his 600 soldiers that had followed him from Israel.

In this map, one can see how far apart David was from Saul when that happened. Saul was killed, along with his sons, in the battle of Mount Gilboa. The Philistines, including warriors from Gath, had surrounded Saul’s army; and, Saul sought out a medium, who put him in touch with the recently deceased Samuel. The ghost of Samuel said Saul would be with him soon. Thus, after Saul received word that all of his sons had fallen in battle, he committed suicide.

Supposedly, suicide would prevent the Philistines from desecrating his body, but the bodies of Saul and his three sons were beheaded and mutilated, then hung on the wall of a holy building in Beth Shan. Citizens of Jabesh Gilead, who were long supporters of Saul, heard of this desecration and traveled to remove the bodies so they could be burned and their bones given a proper burial.

News of this event reached David while he was in Ziklag, a Philistine town. Twice prior David had been sent by God to rescue Saul from battles, and Saul had given his word that he would not try to kill David. Still, David acted under the orders of the Philistine King of Gath, where David lived in exile for sixteen months. The news of Saul and Jonathan’s deaths came via an escaped Amalekite, who came upon Saul after he had “fallen on his sword;” but he reported that Saul had lived. Saul was then leaning on his spear, knowing he would die; so, he asked the Amalekite to kill him, which he did. The Amalekite then took Saul’s crown and a band from his arm to give to David in Ziklag. Because the Amalekite admitted killing Saul, David ordered him be put to death.

This history is important to realize, as it plays a role in understanding this song. By naming it Song of the Bow, the bow was the weapon of the archer, thus it was a weapon of war. Jonathan was known for his abilities with a bow, so the song must be seen as an ode to the man David loved, who had been lost in war. The song was to be taught to the people of Judah as a way of teaching the children, those who would grow into soldiers. The lesson of the song was for them not to ever become overconfident in their own personal strengths and talents, as war has a way of humbling even the greatest warriors.

The repeated refrain is “How the mighty have fallen!” That translation omits the Hebrew word “ḥā·lāl,” which says, “is killed” or “is slain,” and removes any question as if “fallen” can mean a simple fall that can be recovered from. The truth of the refrain says the mighty have been slain, thus they have fallen from power. They are no longer high and mighty.

This message would be one sung by new army recruits as they exercised their muscles. It would act as a reminder that war should always be a last resort and always with God on one’s side. If one then falls in battle, one’s soul will be better treated.

We also read that this poem of David was written into the Book of Jasher, where “jasher” means “upright,” while also having translations as “conscientious” and “proposal of peace.” In a way that is not intended, but applies to the meaning of “upright” as “being in a vertical position,” the dead are horizontal, while the living are “upright.” In this regard, the Book of Jasher would be a collection of songs and writings of memorable events in the history of war that told of the joys of victory and the agonies of defeat, written by those who were left standing after the battles were over.

The book then acts as a way to teach the lesson that history repeats, telling the stories of the ups and downs of life. It tells the lesson of just and unjust war. As such, it echoed what Jesus spoke to Peter, after he cut an arresting guard’s ear off: “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.” (Matthew 26:52)

This song takes the memory of Saul, who was no longer loved by the Israelite people, and paints him as strong and courageous, which was the truth in part. Still, even the strongest kings stand trembling in the face of a giant that is obviously undefeatable or insurmountable. Only those who know God has sent them to war have the confidence to overcome great odds.

The desecration of Saul’s body in defeat was erased from the record of David’s psalm. Jonathan was also seen in the glory of his past victories, not the desecration of his and his brothers’ bodies and the humiliation of their public display. David erased that image from the minds of all who would sing this song as a reminder that some wars must be fought. Those call upon the soldiers who are “swifter than eagles,” and “stronger than lions.” However, that alone is not enough.

When David sang to the Israelites, telling them to weep, and saying to remember how Saul had “clothed you with crimson, in luxury,” and had “put ornaments of gold on your apparel,” his death meant all that glory was lost. His greatness alone had brought the spoils of victory, but his defeat meant other victors would reap that reward. Therefore, “How the mighty have fallen in the midst of the battle!” meant Israel was then without a king and the spoils of the victor … the enemy left upright would be based on the results of that battle lost.

Scholars say that the Book of Jasher only appears here and in the Book of Joshua. It is not a verifiable Hebrew document, as it has no record that has survived. Its mention here comes when David was in Philistine Ziklag, as an ally to the Philistines. This leads me to see the purpose of such a book was to be one read by the enemies of Israel. The Israelites had their own record of God’s achievements through great men.

This would mean the Book of Upright Men was a document of Canaanite origin, so the non-Israelite people could remember there were more mighty warriors that had fallen against the Israelite YAHWEH, than there were victories against those whose leaders (like Saul) had forsaken their YAHWEH and depended on their personal might. This makes the Book of Jasher a book of praise and mourning for all who have gone to battle without YAHWEH on their side. Victories would only come when the Israelites had turned their backs to being YAHWEH elohim – the angels on earth in the bodies of men [and women], whose souls were married to YAHWEH.

David then sang, “Jonathan lies slain upon your high places. I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan; greatly beloved were you to me; your love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women.” This is a tribute to Jonathan by David, where he expressed in words the soul connection the two young men felt between each other. The immediate “love” emanating from the “souls” of both males [David was still prepubescent, at ten-years of age when the two first met in Saul’s house] speaks of past lives together. Quite possibly David and Jonathan were the same souls as Adam and Eve, or Abram and Sarai, or Jacob and Rachel, as man and woman joined in human marriage [but barren because of their souls were both elohim]. The “love” between David and Jonathan is then stated to be “passing the love of women,” because Spiritual “love” [the “love of God”] is so much greater than a human union that longs to reproduce. In today’s perverse world, some would see this love between David and Jonathan as evidence of their sharing their bodies with one another in homosexual activity. This must not be read into this.

David was the youngest of Jesse’s sons, and his older brothers probably never spent quality time with David. They loved each other as family; but David might have been given responsibilities that kept him away from social contacts with other boys that were his age. When David first met Jonathan, he had just killed Goliath and was not yet a man. Jonathan and David connected as brothers who cared deeply for one another in normal, natural, and typical ways. Their friendship was purely platonic and the epitome of “best friends forever.” Each would have wives who met their sexual needs.

In this regard, one has to realize that David is pure in his actions to all people and totally led by Yahweh within. David was chosen by Yahweh and anointed by Samuel to be the replacement for Saul. That made David Yahweh’s chosen child, with Him knowing the heart and mind of all His servants. Because Moses commanded laws be memorized and obeyed, the law that says a priest of YAHWEH cannot be homosexual eliminates that possibility from David. The law states, “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.” (Leviticus 20:13)

Let me address this law in terms of accepting that there is, has always been, and will always be homosexual human beings on earth. It is no different than any other sin that eliminates one from serving gods [lower forms of elohim that are demonic]. To serve Yahweh, one must show one’s devotion by abstaining from all sins, including all of a sexual nature; with the ability to withstand the urges of the flesh made possible by the Spirit – the Advocate Jesus promised his apostles – whose presence makes a soul in flesh become Holy, a Saint. Therefore, homosexuality falls into the category that includes all sins forbidden by law: murder, stealing, coveting, and anything else that sets a priest of the YAHWEH apart from the common riffraff of the world.

God chose the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as His children who would become His priests, because they practiced the ways of the righteous [assisted by the Spirit of divine marriage], more than an external religion that prepared them for fulfilling a holy purpose. The Egyptians were not chosen, for example. That was not a condemnation of Egyptians, but a statement that they were not prepared to serve only the One God.

In effect, by not choosing the Egyptians, God allowed them to be like everyone else in the world and do whatever they deemed good. The Laws of Moses are not for a government to order upon their citizens. The Israelites were chosen because they rejected the laws allowed under Egyptian rule, because those laws were against the laws of a priest to the One God. One can only voluntarily become a priest to YAHWEH, but that requires a marriage commitment – till death do you part.

Homosexuality might be deemed good by some cultures (even some subcultures in this world we live in today), but that disqualifies one from being a priest of YAHWEH. That refusal to marry Yahweh and submit to His Will absolutely disqualifies all souls who bow down to lesser gods, like self and self-addictions [of all kinds]. One cannot serve God when one has been put to death by the sin of male homosexuality, having the blood of that death upon the ego that would not bend to meet the needs of YAHWEH. In effect, sin is a state of selfishness and homosexuality is spurred by purely selfish desires.

As a potential reading for the sixth Sunday after Pentecost, when one’s personal ministry should be underway, the call is to not to think that oneself is almighty and thy will must be done. As David’s wish is to forever remember those who have fallen from the heights of power and rule, this song is named “the bow” or “the bowman, archer.” The lesson to be learned is how not to shoot arrows in defense of a nation that has become wayward, because without God’s blessing those arrows sent flying will come back upon oneself [where a “self” equals a “soul”].

The story behind this song of lament needs to be known so it can become a comparison to today. Israel had asked Samuel to arrange a king of their choice to lead them. Saul became the Israelite’s surrogate god. He became a mighty man and his sons became princes. The same national setting surrounds every nation in the world today. God is leading no one, because everyone stands and salutes a mighty man that is only as mighty as his body allows him [or her] to be, by avoiding the bullets and swords of the enemies that hate the high and mighty. To be an Israelite, devoted to the One God (Yahweh), one has to see how the government of our nation is trying to kill the religious, just as Saul tried to kill David.

To be in ministry today, in the modern setting of continual turmoil, where one nation is a house divided against itself, one needs to find safety by understanding the enemy. David found safety in Gath, one of the five Philistine cities. David lived among those who warred with Israel (just as the Palestinians do today in Gaza). The enemy is not the issue, as we are told:

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” (Matthew 5:43-48)

The issue is those who say they believe in Jesus Christ and say they love God, but then they become so high and mighty that they cannot live up to those words of promise. They shoot out Biblical arrows that condemn the world, but then fall on their own swords in fear of what the enemy will do to them, once the battle is lost and there are no more quotes to be thrown. America and Western Europe have set themselves up for defeat by kneeling before technology and the weaponry that makes a minimal size military seem adequate enough to appease their lesser gods. Borders are slack or non-existent, to the point that foreigners of all kinds regularly stream into the nations of the West. Meanwhile, the enemy has dressed themselves as Christian lambs that quote Jesus, turning his focus on love so it seems to the weak-minded that Jesus meant trusting evil ways in one’s midst can be good. Thus, the Western world is poised on Mount Gilboa for another surprising defeat.

“How the mighty have fallen!”

Ministry understands the messages of Jesus Christ and tells others the truth, which most do not want to hear. Jesus never said to live amongst your enemies. He never said to surrender the philosophy of the One God for the equal rights of all gods, good and bad. One loves an enemy by accepting that the world is full of enemies. One loves an enemy by not getting in an enemy’s face and calling the enemy evil. One loves an enemy by not living amongst one’s enemies, so the enemy has the freedom to hate you in abstentia.

As the saying goes, “Out of sight, out of mind,” one loves an enemy by not focusing on hating an enemy, which is the natural emotion held between enemies. America has fallen in love with its Saul (the Constitution), to a degree that it thinks one must prove it loves its enemy by letting its enemy inside the walls of the nation, even letting the enemy govern the land. A nation cannot serve two masters – Christianity, Capitalism, Socialism, Atheism, Science, Military Technology, et al (choose two?). The reason is, paraphrasing as Jesus stated, “for either the nation will hate the one master, and love the other; or else the nation will hold to the one master, and despise the other. America cannot serve God and all the wealth from which it has risen to great heights.

“O daughters of Christianity, weep over the Constitution, whose words clothed you with crimson, in luxury, whose promises put ornaments of gold on your apparel.” The illusion of freedom brought low-wage slaves to your shores, willing to live in squalor for the American Dream, while fighting its wars against all who would oppose that independence. America has been a nation of immigrants willing to kill or be killed in the name of good versus evil. God has rewarded Americans with the spoils of war. Now, we have seen the enemy and he is us.

Ministry today sees the hatred that permeates this nation. The enemy has been allowed to be among us and that presence causes hatred to spew out. If only we had a safe place to not be faced with our enemies; but there is none. Our neighbors have become our enemies, making it difficult to walk down a street without glares and whispers of contempt being made.

The nebulosity of the Law, which are akin to those brought in by Jezebel, now chokes the life out of the West’s love of God. We trusted in human leaders and elected officials to guide us to the right direction; but they failed us as we failed ourselves. Our governors are incapable of straightening out the messes they have made.

Ministry to Yahweh does not add fuel to the fire, but it does not ignore the fire that is already burning. People sense a grave danger ahead and they are seeking knowledge and reason to proceed. The answer can be seen in this song of lament. There is only one Master one can serve, and few have chosen the One God.

Ministry to Yahweh should be teaching the children this song of the bow, so they can prepare for the deaths that come from hero worship; but the lesson is long lost. It seems too lost for anyone to turn and face Yahweh at this late juncture, sacrificing all the things that freedom and equality bring.

The cry has gone out: “Make America great again!”

The enemies cry back: “Death to America!”

“How the mighty have fallen in the midst of the battle!”

“How the mighty have fallen, and the weapons of war perished!”

And the ministers in pulpits sing their political songs of self-righteousness and the people all gladly sing along. “Everyone we hate is our enemy!” They sing, “If you do not think like us, then you are one of them!”

“Onward Christian soldiers, marching as to war.” The bowmen have quivers filled with barbs of condemnation, poisoned-dipped with lines of Scripture, to be aimed at friend or foe alike. The lesson is it has happened before. We are to know it will happen again, unless we remember this Song of the Bow.

Wisdom of Solomon 1:13-15; 2:23-24 – Of life and death

[Yahweh] did not make death,

And he does not delight in the death of the living.

For he created all things so that they might exist;

the generative forces of the world are wholesome,

and there is no destructive poison in them,

and the dominion of Hades is not on earth.

For righteousness is immortal.

———-

[Yahweh] created us for incorruption,

and made us in the image of his own eternity,

but through the devil’s envy death entered the world,

and those who belong to his company experience it.

——————–

This is the Track 2 optional Old Testament selection that will be read aloud on the sixth Sunday after Pentecost [Proper 8], Year B, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. It is important because it states the wisdom that says human beings – souls in bodies – are born for eternal life. If not for the lures of sin, everyone on earth would personally know Yahweh.

In the Hebrew text for this reading, a ‘double yod’ [or ‘two yuds’] is written [“י י”], which is said to be an abbreviated form of the name “Adonai,” also recognized as “HaShem.” The word “Adonay,” like “elohim,” is the plural number form of “adon,” such that the actual translation is as “lords.” As such, these words of wisdom can be questioned, as to whether or not they directly refer to Yahweh, or the lesser “lords” of the material world, who are under the control of His Spirit. By having this forewarning, one can read the following assessment with that extra insight. The following was originally posted for consumption [written by this author] in 2018. Only minor changes have been made to this, as everything written then still applies today.

It should be recognized that this reading selection comes from an Apocryphal book, which means it is a “Hidden” text that is not officially part of the Christian Bible. As a work that has been denied free access with those deemed most holy, without doubt, it has been scrutinized by scholars “after the fact,” searching for clues of authorship. As such, it has been determined that this is not a work written by King Solomon; and, it is not thought to have been written by only one human being. This focus on perceived flaws is not how one should address this book, and thus this reading.

The assumption that must be made is that Solomon, who as a child, loved Yahweh. Yahweh knew that Solomon had an “upright soul.” In a dream, before Solomon would assume control of the throne of Israel, Yahweh asked Solomon what assistance He could give this young man. Solomon asked for the gift of wisdom, in the sense that he wanted “understanding” and “discernment capabilities for good and evil,” so he could properly “judge” the way the Israelites should go, as they had been led by David. Solomon was granted that wish by Yahweh; but Solomon was never the author of any wisdom he spoke.

All true wisdom comes from Yahweh, flowing through one who is committed in their hearts to receive His thoughts. Therefore, the “Wisdom of Solomon” is from the same source, whether it flowed through a king of Israel, or a Prophet of YAHWEH, before or after the fall of Israel and Judah. It is the same flowing through Jesus and then the Apostles in his name, all as the Christs [Anointed ones] of Yahweh, who will always be tested in the wilderness.

Wisdom exceeds the bounds of knowledge that humans can master, as it accepts the unknown readily, understanding what had been hidden from sight. Experience becomes the foresight of the future, from a clarity generated by hindsight.

When this view is understood, Yahweh is known to be the author. With Him accepted as the author, the test of that authorship is the truth. Each line of prose or poetry must pass this test. Regardless of who wrote the words down on parchment, the truth they expose is the proof that the One God is the source of all wisdom and knowledge.

This selected reading consists of five verses, three from chapter one and two from chapter two. From two arcs on a circle, one circuit of thought is connected. The first verse (verse 13) states (literally): “that Adonai not tested death. not desire destruction of life.” The Episcopal Church shows, “God did not make death, And he does not delight in the death of the living.” The Hebrew text shows the presence of a period mark, making two separate, but relative statements. These boil down to: “Adonai does not test death” and “Adonai does not desire the destruction of life.”

This points out that God is the Creator, not a destroyer. God only makes “life” in the spiritual realm, with the material realm the opposite of “life,” as the absence of “life” is “death.” Neither a soul nor dead matter can ever be lost from Creation, although both can change states, simulating birth and death.

Samael, the Destroyer who sows destructive poison

God brought forth life into death, as a soul animating a body of flesh. Death is not the “destruction” of “life,” as a soul is eternal. However, the “test” of “death” is placed on the soul to be married to Yahweh and allow Him to be the “Lord” [“Adonai”] of “life” in “death,” so the soul can return to the realm of the living [Yahweh]. Thus a soul “not “ able to pass the “test” of the material realm, whose “lord” is self, influenced by Satan, will return to that realm after a body of flesh returns to matter, as “death.”

Transition is a state of change in life. The scientific-philosophical mind believes that since Creation there has been no new matter created and no original matter lost. All that was then is now and will be forever, with everything in between merely the natural states of change and transition. Therefore, the “death of the living” has nothing to do with the material universe, as it refers to souls.

In verse 14 we read, “For he created all things so that they might exist; the generative forces of the world are wholesome, and there is no destructive poison in them, and the dominion of Hades is not on earth.” This states that all things are designed to go through changes.

There are seasonal fluctuations, where growth and recession are natural. There are the global transitions, where tectonic plates move, volcanoes eject the inner earth onto the surface and sedimentary formations are from natural growth and rebirth cycles over ages. The temperature changes brings ice ages and global warming, where oceans rise and fall, and rivers, lakes, and streams go from dry to overflowing. All of this is normal life. What appears to be destructive is natural transformation.

The souls of human beings are given creation amid this flux, where changes from one body to the next are as natural as flowers blooming and then wilting away. Hell, which destroys souls, is not part of this world created by God.

When verse 15 then states, “For righteousness is immortal,” the purpose of life is to find righteousness. Righteousness is beyond wholesome. Righteousness is the creation of Yahweh’s Spirit within one who rejects the destructive poisons planted by Satan. Righteousness is the human soul’s choice to make, by choosing to serve Yahweh over Satan. The reward of righteousness is everlasting life in the Spiritual realm.

In the leap to the last two verses of chapter two, the King James Version shows “immortal” being the translation, rather than “incorruption.” As such, it is written in verse 23: “God created man to be immortal, and made him (man) to be an image of his own eternity.”

The plural pronoun “us” is “man,” such that it is written in Genesis, “Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness,” (Genesis 1:26) where the LORD of lords (YHWH elohim), the God who made the gods (“In the beginning [YHWH] created gods [elohim] – Genesis 1:1) is the One God from which all Creation of souls (immortal souls and mortal with immortal souls) come.

More than being in the image of God by having a head, two arms and two legs – all attached to a trunk – the image of God (and gods) is that of the immortality of a soul. A soul cannot be corrupted by death. However, a body with a soul can be corrupted, leading the soul to pay for that corruption.

In the final verse of chapter two, which says, “but through the devil’s envy death entered the world, and those who belong to his company experience it,” the corruption of a body with a soul is due to Satan’s envy of mankind. This verse tells of the division in Heaven between the “elohim” of the “gods.” Those of “his company” are the angels that rebelled against God’s command to serve mankind. These were cast within the earth, which makes them like Man, as eternal souls trapped in bodies. However, there is no release from those bodies as those souls are death.

“Throw upon him hurled and pointed stones, covering him with darkness; There shall he remain forever; cover his face, that he may not see the light. And in the great day of judgment let him be cast into the fire.” (1 Enoch 7-9)

As an optional reading for the sixth Sunday after Pentecost, when one’s personal ministry should be underway, this wisdom speaks of the lure away from eternal life and towards the trappings of the devil. It is the envy of Satan, brought on because God made Man as wholesome and immortal, that makes Satan thrive on misleading humankind away from its promise. As long as Man’s soul remains uncorrupted, Satan will continue to whisper, “God will still take you in Heaven if you only do this sin. God is forgiving.”

That lure is heard because one has not sacrificed the self for the protection of Jesus Christ within one’s soul. A human soul is too wholesome to not be tricked without that care from the Holy Spirit, which can only come from a total commitment to God (marriage). This is the lesson from Genesis, of Eve being deceived by the serpent and Adam following along. Their human forms with eternal souls were separate from God’s presence.

Ministry means having made that sacrifice, so one speaks from knowledge of faith and can guide others to the same protection and reward of eternal life with God. Ministry means opening the eyes and the ears of human bodies holding souls, so they can know the truth. Ministry means speaking the Wisdom of Solomon. Otherwise, the lies of Satan will lead soul after soul to corruption.

———-

Note:

The Hebrew website Sefaria translates to English this reading as such:

13 For ye have not chosen death. And did not desire the loss of life:

14 To set them up for ever, and the peace of the people of the land is in their hand. The wrath of doom is not among them, and Saul is not in the dust of

his power:

15 For righteousness shall not die. And the wickedness of death:

23 For he created man to revive him eternal life. And he shall make it in his image after the likeness of it;

24 And in the envy of the devil death rose up in the world. And who in his destiny will be supported:

2 Corinthians 8:7-15 – A marriage that makes Jesus one’s Lord, as Anointed by resurrection within

As you excel in everything– in faith, in speech, in knowledge, in utmost eagerness, and in our love for you– so we want you to excel also in this generous undertaking.

I do not say this as a command, but I am testing the genuineness of your love against the earnestness of others. For you know the generous act of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, so that by his poverty you might become rich. And in this matter I am giving my advice: it is appropriate for you who began last year not only to do something but even to desire to do something– now finish doing it, so that your eagerness may be matched by completing it according to your means. For if the eagerness is there, the gift is acceptable according to what one has– not according to what one does not have. I do not mean that there should be relief for others and pressure on you, but it is a question of a fair balance between your present abundance and their need, so that their abundance may be for your need, in order that there may be a fair balance. As it is written,

“The one who had much did not have too much, and the one who had little did not have too little.”

——————–

This is the Epistle selection to be read aloud on the sixth Sunday after Pentecost [Proper 8], Year B, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. This evaluation was originally written and posted in 2018, with some small modifications made, so it is represented as still a viable interpretation of this reading. It is important because Paul delves into the benefits of having received the Holy Spirit and become one with Jesus Christ.

In verse 7, the Greek word translated as “you excel” is “perisseuete.” The root verb, “perisseuó,” more readily states, “I exceed the ordinary (the necessary), abound, overflow; am left over.” This makes “excel” an acceptable substitute. However, “excel” can be read as a form of personal achievement, brought about by natural talents and a devotion to perfect one’s mastering of some desired action; and, such personal achievement cannot be read into this word penned by Paul.

To read the intent as Paul stating to the Christians of Corinth as him stating, “You exceed the ordinary in everything,” the explanation is then the gifts that have been allowed them all by Yahweh. The level of “excellence” Paul knew the Corinthians displayed was the same as that coming from the talents that Yahweh gives to all His wives – souls married to Him, having received His Spirit. Therefore, he could list them specifically as 1.) Faith; 2.) Speech; 3.) Knowledge; and 4.) Eagerness (as far as this translation allows one to see).

In the Greek written, the end of this list states, “and in the (ones) , from us to you , love , that also , in this the grace , you should abound”. The presence of marks of pause and reflection (commas) then makes it possible to add to the list: 5.) A brotherhood of Saints; 6.) God’s love; and 7.) The gift of the presence of Jesus Christ.

The Greek word written, “chariti” (like “charity”), means “grace, favor, kindness,” where its use in the New Testament implied such “grace” “as a gift or blessing brought to man by Jesus Christ, (b) favor, (c) gratitude, thanks, (d) a favor, kindness.” It is this “grace” or “favor” that binds one Apostle to all Apostles in the brotherhood of Jesus Christ, where all Apostles (males and females He made them) are reborn Sons of God. The unity that binds is God’s love. This union is not from practice, desire, or aptitude that is achieved through personal will, as it is only possible as a gift of God. This list of Paul is, therefore, the rewards of one’s soul being married to God through the cleansing of the His Spirit, all of which is gained after the dowry of marriage has been paid in full –the sacrifice of one’s self will in obedience and submission to Yahweh’s Will.

This then says the verse begins by actually stating, “the exception just as upon all you exceed the ordinary.” This says a wife of Yahweh becomes extraordinary through marriage, having gone beyond the normal human existence that begins with true faith [“pistei”]. This word in Greek means “belief” in the ordinary, but “faith” in the extraordinary. The truth about “faith” – a stand-alone word statement – is it can only come from personal experience, whereas “belief” is acceptance of external conditions. Thus, the extraordinary is the presence of Yahweh’s Spirit within one’s being – merged with one’s soul – so one knows Yahweh personally; and, it is that direct relationship that brings about all the acts of “faith” that require Yahweh’s assistance.

The next verse does not state that Paul was “testing the genuineness of your love against the eagerness of others.” Instead, Paul wrote from afar, with the personal experience of a true Christian. This means he admitted he was not commanding anything of the Corinthians, but simply stating some facts that become apparent through the Mind of Christ. This Mind knew the “eagerness” of all Apostles to please God. As such, Paul was stating how he knew this love of God within the Christians of Corinth would prove itself as genuine, through their acceptance of new disciples, just as Paul had accepted them. Less than a “testing” by Paul, the presence of Jesus Christ within the Corinthians would be “proving the genuineness of their love” to others.

This verse (8) begins with a capitalized “Ou,” which elevates the meaning of “No” or “Not” to a divine level of meaning. This says marriage to Yahweh is “Not according to a command.” Paul knew what being a wife of Yahweh meant, as he wrote “I speak,” knowing his words were “Not” from “instruction” commanded by Yahweh. The speech of “others” was demonstrating the same “enthusiasm” Paul felt, so rather than being commanded to speak, all desired to speak. What they had come to know was beyond keeping to themselves. That led Paul to point out the “love” that draws a soul to marry Yahweh, as well as His love being returned. The “love of God” is not everchanging, like is human emotions. It is constant and never ceasing.

Paul then stated in verse nine, “You know indeed the grace of the Lord of us Jesus Christ,” which stated the Christians of Corinth, just like the Christian Paul and his Apostle companions, knew the presence of Jesus Christ was one with their beings. This knowledge was due to “the favor ” (“charin”) Jesus Christ brought them as their personal “Lord.” That presence is sent upon all of Yahweh’s lovers in marriage, because He will accept no less than perfection in His brides (males and females He marries His brides). That presence of Jesus Christ as the Lord of an Apostle is “for the sake of them,” due to their human actions of devotion and commitment to God.

Here, it is vital to see the capitalization of three words, in a series of four words. All capitalized words become divinely elevated in meaning. This means titles evaporate and become the truth that leads to the title or name. The capitalization of “Lord” must be seen separately from all other words, due to the capitalization of “Kyrie.” This takes the word that means “lord, master, or sir,” which points to someone external to oneself, and places the meaning of “Lord” to the Spirit of Yahweh that leads one’s personal life. When once a body of flesh ruled over a soul [brain-led], the “Lord” has become Yahweh’s Spirit.

This then leads one to see the name “Jesus,” which becomes the “name of Yahweh” that is the “Lord” of one’s being. The name “Jesus” is elevated in meaning to that which says “Yah[weh] Will Save.” This then says Yahweh will save one’s soul by resurrecting the soul of His Son Jesus within, merged with one’s own soul of life. While Jesus was accepted to have been “the Christ,” when a soul is married to Yahweh and received His Spirit in the name of “Jesus,” then that one has likewise become an “Anointed one,” as a new “Christ” reborn.

Between the capitalized word “Lord” and the capitalized word “Jesus” is the lower-case word “hēmōn,” which translates as “of us” or “our.” The contraction of “us” or “our” strips away the realization that “hēmōn” is a first person plural genitive form of “egó,” which is a statement of being. That means “us” and “our” is a reduction from stating “ourselves,” where the word “self” means a “soul. As such, the four words can and should be seen as Paul stating, the “Lord of our souls is Jesus as our Anointment.”

When we read the translation above that says, “That though [Jesus Christ] was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor,” the meaning is an Apostle, as a human being, is impoverished by sin. To cleanse a soul of sin, one must sacrifice the self-ego, which then leaves a human body with a soul that has an Advocate forever after present within, to enrich the person and keep it from returning to the poverty of a worldly domain. The illusion of riches from the world have been turned aside, placing one into a vow of material poverty, choosing Spiritual wealth. This is the dowry a human being must make in order to accept the proposal of marriage with God. Therefore, when one has become poor in worldly lusts, then one has become the resurrections of Jesus, as a Christ reborn of flesh. Therein comes the richness of the heavenly, entering the soul of the cleansed.

When Paul then finished this thought by writing, “so that by [Jesus Christ’s] poverty you might become rich,” this says that the resurrection of Jesus’ soul with one’s own soul makes one a Christ reborn. Jesus is the new “Lord” or King within one’s being [a nation or tabernacle], so one can “become rich.” These riches are not measured in material means, but in Spiritual gifts: faith, speech, knowledge, eagerness, brotherhood, love, and the presence of Jesus and the Christ as one’s new identity.

Still, Paul added his advice to the Corinthians, about this presence of Jesus and the Christ within, and how their vows of poverty could be “profitable for you” (“hymin sympherei”). The translation above – “for you who began last year not only to do something but even to desire to do something” – misses the point Paul made about “thelein.” That is a direct statement about the sacrifice made “a year ago,” which was that of personal “will, wish, desire, intend, and design.” Instead of Paul referencing the Corinthians’ “desire to do something,” as if he made a suggestion to rekindle their personal egos, he instead advised they “now finish doing it.” The Greek word written, “epitelesate,” means Paul recommended the Corinthians “complete, accomplish, and/or perfect” their submission to God’s Will.

Paul then explained this “completion” by writing, “so even as there was readiness to the will [of Yahweh to submit to], so also is the [readiness] to complete.” He then continued by saying, “if indeed the readiness is present, as if he might have acceptable, not as not he does not have.” The translation above says this as, “For if the eagerness is there, the gift is acceptable according to what one has– not according to what one does not have.”

The meaning is to submit completely to the Will of God, without question and without any personal desire for more gifts of God, seemingly brought on by the eagerness to serve God. In essence, this states a personal quest to be ranking higher among the men of God. A total commitment does not keep up with what other talents other Apostles possess. A total commitment to God releases all personal desires and accepts what God allows.

The translation above that states, “I do not mean that there should be relief for others and pressure on you,” the focus is on one feeling pains by not being able to help another, due to the limitations of Yahweh’s gifts bestowed. An Apostle is still feeling personal ego pains when they feel such pressure to perform as self, rather than as Jesus reborn. The literal statement coming from the Greek words written by Paul say, “not indeed to others ease, but for you affliction; but of equality,” where “isotētos” means, “equality, equality of treatment, and fairness.” One still bearing the weight of self-ego is equal to the one who has yet to sacrifice his or hers, such that one is attracted to another for the purpose of seeing one’s shortcomings before God, more than being able to see one’s self has become a hand of God on the earth.

This makes the advice of Paul to the Corinthians to be a recommendation to further their commitment to Yahweh, rather than as a way to see the inequalities among the Apostles as a measurement of one’s piety before Him. One must thank Yahweh for all His generosities and see His equal treatment of all His wives (males and females He takes human wives). Anything less than seeing this means more self-sacrifice is required.

This is the purpose behind Paul writing, as translated above, “it is a question of a fair balance between your present abundance and their need, so that their abundance may be for your need, in order that there may be a fair balance.” This is then based on “the present time” (“en tō nyn”) of the epistle’s writing, which is always the “time” of relevance, where one’s personal “abundance” from God, to meet the needs of others, is always relative to the needs of others being to a reflection of one’s own needs. As such, the equality exposed is in how one retains the sins of the world, rather than release them through completion of sacrifice.

The issue of equality is then found in Paul quoting from Exodus 16:18, stating, “The one who had much did not have too much, and the one who had little did not have too little.” This is relative to the gathering of manna that was sent by God and the instructions given to the Israelites by Moses. This quote by Paul is then reference to the surrounding story in Exodus 16, where we read:

“Moses said to them, “It is the bread the Lord has given you to eat. This is what the Lord has commanded: ‘Everyone is to gather as much as they need. Take an omer for each person you have in your tent.’”

“The Israelites did as they were told; some gathered much, some little. And when they measured it by the omer, the one who gathered much did not have too much, and the one who gathered little did not have too little. Everyone had gathered just as much as they needed.”

“Then Moses said to them, “No one is to keep any of it until morning.”

“However, some of them paid no attention to Moses; they kept part of it until morning, but it was full of maggots and began to smell. So Moses was angry with them.” (Exodus 16:15b-20)

This then becomes applicable to the talents and gifts of the Holy Spirit, as sent to God’s wives just as God sent manna to the Israelites. It also relates comparatively to the demands of the Passover, where the lamb was to be totally consumed, with nothing kept over in the morning. It says that which Yahweh gives is for His work being done, not up to the discretion of the recipient of His gifts. Thus, like the parable of the wicked servant who buried the talent given him, talents given by Yahweh are like manna from heaven so His wives are well-nourished and enabled to serve Him.

Paul was recommending that the Apostles in Corinth see the value of being given the food of Yahweh, through His High Priest Jesus, such that nothing being left over means Jesus will lead one to go all out for Yahweh. Just as manna was sent to be gathered in portions and measurements that equated to that needed by those who would be fed by it [one faithful servant was given five minas, another two], Yahweh [the Master] knows how much one needs each day. All that comes through the Spirit and is meant to be used. None can be wasted. The only waste is found in those who still retain self-ego and seek more than needed.

As an epistle selection for the sixth Sunday after Pentecost, when one’s personal ministry for God should be underway, this tells one the talents one should already possess. That must be faith that peaks from personal experience of marriage to Yahweh, feeling the presence of His Spirit and the resurrection of Jesus, making one be another Son of man – a new Christ. That must be the ability to speak in tongues and explain holy Scripture fluently. That must be the knowledge that comes from the Christ Mind, with the eagerness to serve God as Jesus reborn within one’s soul. That must make one realize a need for a brotherhood of Saints [all like the Corinthians, males and females transformed into Jesus, so all are brother in Christ – elohim] in a true Church of Christ; all are the resurrection of Jesus within. This reading says true Christians possess the love of God that confesses one’s soul has been married to God via the Spirit, made Sacred and Set apart by God as Holy. This part of Paul’s letter says the favor coming from having become Jesus reborn from above is for one to enter ministry and bring others to marry Yahweh, just as Jesus did countless times. Those characteristics define all ministers of God, which deems them Apostles and Saints.

Still, this message tells all who have submitted to the Will of God not to retain even the slightest sense of self-worth, as all value one has comes from God. It is not up to oneself to determine what one needs in order to serve others. One serves God, not others; so God will send you what you need and no more. This means a new minister for God still needs to search one’s soul for how one can give more to serve God.

In a ministry for the LORD, one will attract those who one should feed. The nourishment Yahweh gives is the Word of Scripture, explained by Jesus becoming one with one’s soul. The Scriptures then act as the body of Christ and is the manna from Heaven. One gathers what is needed daily, with the day before the Sabbath being the only time more than one’s day’s food is necessary to gather. A minister to Yahweh feeds those sent to him or her the meaning of His Word, until those others are matured and can gather their own manna from Heaven.

A minister sees equality in the sins of the world, not in the talents of the Holy Spirit. This means one cannot pass judgment on sinners, as one is also a sinner without being married to Yahweh. Therefore, all who profess to point out sinners in the name of Jesus are those who have gathered too much, with their words full of maggot and stinking to high hell.

A minister for Yahweh sees the sins of the world reflected upon his or herself. That sin is not to be condemned or one condemns one’s marriage to God and the rebirth of Jesus within. One forgives the sins of others by repentance before God and Christ. This makes ministry for Yahweh the service of caring for other Apostles, so they do not mistakenly judge others wrongly.

Mark 5:21-43 – Do not fear, only believe

When Jesus had crossed again in the boat to the other side, a great crowd gathered around him; and he was by the sea. Then one of the leaders of the synagogue named Jairus came and, when he saw him, fell at his feet and begged him repeatedly, “My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well, and live.” So he went with him.

And a large crowd followed him and pressed in on him. Now there was a woman who had been suffering from hemorrhages for twelve years. She had endured much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had; and she was no better, but rather grew worse. She had heard about Jesus, and came up behind him in the crowd and touched his cloak, for she said, “If I but touch his clothes, I will be made well.” Immediately her hemorrhage stopped; and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease. Immediately aware that power had gone forth from him, Jesus turned about in the crowd and said, “Who touched my clothes?” And his disciples said to him, “You see the crowd pressing in on you; how can you say, ‘Who touched me?’” He looked all around to see who had done it. But the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came in fear and trembling, fell down before him, and told him the whole truth. He said to her, “Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace, and be healed of your disease.”

While he was still speaking, some people came from the leader’s house to say, “Your daughter is dead. Why trouble the teacher any further?” But overhearing what they said, Jesus said to the leader of the synagogue, “Do not fear, only believe.” He allowed no one to follow him except Peter, James, and John, the brother of James. When they came to the house of the leader of the synagogue, he saw a commotion, people weeping and wailing loudly. When he had entered, he said to them, “Why do you make a commotion and weep? The child is not dead but sleeping.” And they laughed at him. Then he put them all outside, and took the child’s father and mother and those who were with him, and went in where the child was. He took her by the hand and said to her, “Talitha cum,” which means, “Little girl, get up!” And immediately the girl got up and began to walk about (she was twelve years of age). At this they were overcome with amazement. He strictly ordered them that no one should know this, and told them to give her something to eat.

——————–

This is the Gospel selection that will be read aloud on the sixth Sunday after Pentecost [Proper 8], Year B, according to the lectionary for the Episcopal Church. This analysis was written and made public by this author in 2018. It is presented again with minor adjustments, as the same meaning then still exists today. This Gospel reading is important because it tells how faith is the power that heals, in more ways than one.

In this Gospel reading selection there are two healings. One is planned and one seems accidental. One is the daughter of a named man, Jairus, and the other is an unnamed woman. One character is a leader of the synagogue, while the other is a follower in the crowd. This contrast shows that faith is the common denominator linking both healings, not one’s position or standing in the world.

In other readings prior, the stories have mentioned Jesus traveling by boat across the Sea of Galilee. We read here that “Jesus had crossed again,” which means “the other side” was across from Capernaum. While it does not state the day of the week this travel by boat occurred, it becomes likely that Jesus, as a rabbi or teacher, set up his synagogue to be not a building, but the grassy land by the sea. This would accommodate Sabbath services, without conflict, if Jesus welcomed gatherings regularly when travel was permitted. In an open space Jesus could teach the meaning of the written text (from divine memory) and address the meaning with the crowd of Jewish followers, who would not be intimidated to speak by Pharisees and envoys of the Temple.

Notice the anchol symbols. Those were Roman funded docks.

By looking at this map above, which lists the places of harbors and anchorages of ancient Roman times, and realizing the need for a harbor to dock a large fishing boat of the type in which Jesus traveled, one can then see how Jesus chose a site of meeting that was not in Galilee. In the map above, one sees the land along the sea was in Gaulantios or Gaulanitis. That land was under the tetrarchy of Philip (Herod Philip II), the half-brother of Herod Antipas, who ruled Galilee and Perea. Samaria and Judea (to the south) were under the governorship of Pilate. Further to the south where Jesus sailed, Hippos was one of the ten autonomous cities in the region known as Decapolis. This means Jesus sought a place that was not where the Romans were openly persecuting the Jews and where the Temple in Jerusalem had little influence.

The element of Jewish cities can be seen in the listing of Bethsaida, Capernaum, and Magdala as places where synagogues would have naturally been. This map below shows how Bethsaida becomes the likeliest place from where Jairus would have been a leader of a synagogue. The crowd of people would have known where Jesus would preach, so they would have left from Capernaum, traveling through Bethsaida, where others would join the trek. The distance from Capernaum to Bethsaida is about 6 miles, and it was about that much distance from Bethsaida to the place of meeting (near a harbor). These distances would indicate Jesus met to preach on days other than the Sabbath, which could indicate Sunday sermons; and Jairus could have easily made it there in time to bring Jesus back quickly (within 4 hours total).

When we read that Jairus was “a leader of the synagogue,” it is important to know what that means. According to the meaning associated with the Greek word “archisynagōgōn” (“rulers of synagogue,” in the plural number), Thayer’s Greek Lexicon says of “archisunagógos”, “It was his duty to select the readers or teachers in the synagogue, to examine the discourses of the public speakers, and to see that all things were done with decency and in accordance with ancestral usage.” This means that Jairus had previously chosen Jesus as the teacher for Sabbath service.

Because we know that Simon-Peter, his brother Andrew, and Philip were disciples of Jesus from Bethsaida, it makes sense that Jairus was an elder of their synagogue. Jairus knew the healing power of Jesus from having witnessed it, perhaps when Jesus told the man with a withered hand to “stretch out your hand.” It is even possible that Jarius was the leader of the synagogue (which could have been in Bethsaida, after Jesus went to Capernaum) who had an unclean spirit that Jesus cast out. Either way or another way, this would explain how Jairus knew where to go find Jesus when his focus was on the health of his daughter.

It is also important to know the meaning of the name Jairus, as named characters in the Gospels are not to have their name’s meaning overlooked. According to the Abarim Publications website, “Jairus” means: “He Enlightens, One Giving Light, He Will Diffuse Light, He Will Enlighten.” This meaning can imply “Jehovah Enlightens,” although there is nothing in the lettering of the name that states “Jehovah.” The name’s meaning is rooted in the Hebrew verb “jair” (אור), which means, “To be light, to give light, to shine.”

This name meaning should then be applied to the character of Jairus, as it shows he was a man who appreciated the truth of the sacred Hebrew texts and sought to shine the light of that truth onto the members of the synagogue he oversaw. He, therefore, recognized the truth and light that Jesus brought into the world, which led him to believe in Jesus as having been sent from God. Such faith would not come without some direct contact with Jesus prior, which affected him personally. Because Jairus sought out Jesus at a time of utmost need, one should assume that Jesus and Jairus had reached a good relationship of trust.

When we read how Jairus came to Jesus and “fell at his feet and begged him repeatedly, the Greek text leads to this act by Jarius by saying, “kai idōn auton,“ which simply states, “and having seen him.” By realizing the placement of a “kai” states importance to be seen in those following words, “having seen” goes beyond Mark saying, “Jarius spotted Jesus in the crowd.” I tells of a past relationship with him and Jesus, where “idōn” is then better translated as “having experienced.” The word “auton” is the third person singular pronoun, as “he, she, it,” but the “kai” brings out the importance of reading the word as “himself.” With the inclusion of “self” the meaning says the “soul” of “him” [“his soul”] had made contact with Jesus [“his soul” as well] before. It was then that prior “experience” that had Jarius prostrate himself before Jesus, as one would doubt he would not have done that to get a doctor’s help.

We then read that Jarius told Jesus, “My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well, and live.” This was a plea from a trusting friend and associate, more than being a demand or test from an elder prostrating himself before one who was proposing to be holy. While some Pharisees would scorn Jesus by demanding he prove his piety, even under the pretense of trying to trick Jesus, this plea by Jairus shows sincerity. That emotional plea for help was made from the heart of Jairus, for love of his little daughter and faith in God that he would be led to the true Son of God for salvation.

This should then be seen as why Jesus dropped everything relative to addressing a crowd of nameless Jews and went with Jairus. He went to save his little daughter for the glory of God. God enlightened Jairus to seek Jesus, so God could be proved through the Son. God likewise enlightened Jesus that this was an important call in his ministry.

As Jesus left to follow Jairus home, the crowd did not know why Jesus was leaving the meeting site, so they pressed in close to follow him. This is where the story exposes a woman who is among the crowd. We are told that she “had been suffering from hemorrhages for twelve years. She had endured much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had; and she was no better, but rather grew worse.”

The Greek wording, “rhysei haimatos,” says, “a flux [or flow] of blood,” which should be understood as a continual state of menstruation. While not stated, it should be assumed that the woman did not have normal periods upon her maturation from childhood; so, one can easily assume that was when she began to have feminine problems. I do not see this as a problem experienced by an older woman. Instead, I feel that she went from childhood’s immaturity to a state that transformed her at puberty.

This naturally occurs around the age of twelve in girls (give or take), so the timing of twelve years means she has not stopped hemorrhaging since she her first period began, meaning she was then twenty-four years of age. It is a loud statement that says she had suffered for as long as she was a child, prior to becoming mature. I sense this because the number of twelve years is stated twice in this reading, which makes that number significant.

One has to grasp how a Jewish woman is deemed to be unclean when she has her period, such that she is banned from the synagogue until her period is over and she has completed the acts of ritual cleansing. This means this particular young woman had been forbidden from partaking of any official lessons and rites other Jews were allowed to attend; and, she was unable to be presented as a potential wife for a husband. She could not have children, making her barren. Her dowry had been spent on doctors who could prescribe nothing to correct her problem, and most likely her family had forced her out on her own, as a rejection of a daughter that had somehow sinned and was being punished by God. By seeing this state of being, it becomes her faith that sought a miracle cure, because she remembered the days of her childhood and the joy she felt being a chosen child of God. Her love of God then drew her to find Jesus.

It should then be realized that this woman’s having been banned from the synagogues, due to being unclean, also forbade her from having contact with a clean Jew. Because her bleeding was contained and mostly secret, she could join with a crowd of strangers and be relatively unnoticed. Contact with others who had hidden sins and covered abnormalities made her be one who was just another face in the crowd of the great unwashed. However, the unclean state forbid her, by Jewish law, from touching one of clean status, especially one who was a teacher of the Jews. However, touching the hem of Jesus’ garment was her way around that rule.

We then read, “She had heard about Jesus, and came up behind him in the crowd and touched his cloak, for she said, “If I but touch his clothes, I will be made well.” Immediately her hemorrhage stopped; and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease.” This says that the woman had placed her faith in doctors, giving all the money she had, but her condition had only worsened. She had never seen Jesus before, only hearing others talk about his words and deeds. Her faith led her to believe Jesus was the one sent by God to save her, so she would not directly come and prostrate herself before the feet of Jesus, pleading her case while being unclean. Instead, she would come from behind, hidden in the crowd, and secretly touch one of the knotted fringes of his prayer shawl [Tallit] or his robe or tunic. His body would not be made unclean by personal contact.

When she did this, “Immediately her hemorrhage stopped; and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease.” The Greek word “euthys” means, “immediately, soon, at once, shortly, straightway, directly and forthwith.” There was healing the instant the woman touched Jesus’ outer garment. At that same moment that the woman knew she was healed, Jesus was “immediately aware that power had gone forth from him,” as the same Greek word “euthys” is again written. The woman “felt in her body that she was healed” at the same time Jesus was “aware that power had gone forth,” causing one to be healed.

Knowing “immediately” means Jesus did not have the foresight to heal. Healing happened with the woman knowing more than Jesus. The two were instantly joined through faith. It was that connection that was made between Jesus and the woman that was her touching God with her faith, such that Jesus felt that touch when the power of God passed through him to the woman. Jesus did not know who the power had touched, but he wanted to know who was in the crowd following him that had such faith in God. Therefore, Jesus asked, “Who touched my clothes?” He asked that question as if he had sensory organs sewn into the fabric of his clothing.

When we read of the disciples replying to Jesus’ question, saying, “You see the crowd pressing in on you; how can you say, ‘Who touched me?’” that meant there was plenty of incidental contact present. That meant Jesus was probably closely surrounded by his disciples, as they cleared a path for him to travel. This means it was quite probable that one of them had touched Jesus, if not once, then multiple times. If not them, then any number of people in the crowd could have touched Jesus out of their admiration. Jesus, however, knew this one touch was different from all the rest.

Jesus knew there was one whose touch caused God to reward his or her faith. So, Jesus “looked all around to see who had done it.” His inability to see who it was means Jesus was not the one who purposefully sent out healing power from his being.

We then read that “the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came in fear and trembling, fell down before him, and told him the whole truth.” In this statement, we have a parallel positioning made before Jesus that was made by Jairus. Jairus had done that as a clean Jew, begging Jesus to come save his little daughter. The woman then did it also as a cleaned Jew, whose body had been cleansed by the power of the water that is the Spirit of Yahweh. More than being ritually cleaned, she had been filled with the that Spirit too, made clean [Sacred by the presence of that Spirit]. Therefore, when Jesus heard her tell “the whole truth,” he said, “Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace, and be healed of your disease,” which was a blessing spoken to the woman by God, through His Son.

In what Jesus spoke to the woman, the Greek written by Mark states: “eipen autē , Thygatēr , hē pistis sou sesōken se,” which literally translates to say, “said to her , Daughter , this faith of you has healed you”. Here, again, like with Jarius “having seen him,” the words “eipen autē” say “brought word to herself,” where “self” again must be read as Jesus speaking “to her soul.” More than her ears hearing Jesus speak, her whole soul was listening; and, then Jesus called her “Daughter,” which is a capitalized word, heightening it to a divine state of meaning. This says it was Yahweh – the Father – speaking to her soul through Jesus, which lets the reader know the Spirit of Yahweh had married her soul. This then led to Jesus saying, “this faith,” where “pistis” means a persona experience (like that Jarius had found), not simple “belief.” Then, the words “sou sesōken se” say “of yourself [soul] has saved yourself [soul].” This means more than her hemorrhage ceased, due to her faith.

When Jesus addressed the woman as “Thygatēr,” “Daughter,” where the capitalization should not be discounted as being merely to denote the first word of a statement, the woman had just been made a Saint. A “Daughter” is then the equivalent to a “Son,” which Jesus of Nazareth was, in relationship to God the Father. The woman had just been announced as one with the same faith as Jesus. The use of the Greek word “sesōken,” translated as “has made you well,” more importantly says, “has saved you, has preserved you, has rescued you,” in more ways than simply being “healed” of a physical disease causing hemorrhaging. She was then sent out into the world with the “peace” of righteousness, which she would spread to all she would come in contact with in the future.

Still, while this title of “Daughter” was bestowed by Jesus to a woman who had been mature for at least twelve years, the dual meaning relates that woman with the “little daughter” of Jairus, who was near death and in need of Jesus’ help. We are told that Jairus’ daughter was twelve years of age, which means as long as she had been alive the woman just saved had been hemorrhaging. Add to that the possibility that the woman began her torment when she too was twelve years of age, then she becomes a reflection of Jairus’ “little daughter.” Both had neared death when they reached puberty.

Like the doctors that took all of the woman’s money, rewarding themselves for her troubles while giving nothing of value to her in return, Jesus reached Jairus’ house and found the daughter surrounded by people wailing and causing a commotion. While Jairus was a reflection of “enlightenment,” he was surrounded by those who would cloud that light. The people sent to him and who stayed at his home lacked faith. They went to tell Jairus, “Your daughter is dead.” They only saw one diagnosis with no cure. They laughed at Jesus for being weak of mind.

On the other hand, when Jesus told Jairus, “Do not fear, only believe,” Jairus maintained his faith in Jesus. Thus, when the people in Jairus’ house to whom Jesus said, “The child is not dead but sleeping” laughed, they were told to leave. The clouds that blocked the light were dispersed. The light of truth was free to shine.

With the disbelievers away, we read that Jesus “took the child’s father and mother and those who were with him, and went in where the child was.” Those who were with Jesus were his disciples Peter, and James and John of Zebedee. They loved Jesus and had faith in his works. Jairus and his wife loved their daughter and had faith in the works of Jesus as well. Surrounded by those drawn to the light of truth, Jesus took the girl “by the hand and said to her, “Talitha cum,” which means, “Little girl, get up!” And immediately the girl got up and began to walk about.” The girl was only sleeping.

The use of the Greek word “euthys” again appears, such that there was an instant connection made between God and the daughter when the words uttered by Jesus touched her being (her soul’s presence). More than his laying on hands, Jesus spoke the Word of Yahweh that healed.

Just as Jesus would say when news reached him across the Jordan that Lazarus had fallen ill, Jesus had said, “Lazarus is only sleeping.” However, when Jesus returned to Bethany, where Lazarus had been dead and buried after four days, the touch of Jesus’ voice to Lazarus’ being, “Come out!” had the same effect. Lazarus also “got up and began to walk about.” It was the Word that brought Lazarus back to life, just as it was the Word that raised Jairus’ daughter.

The symbolism of sleep-to-death and wake-to-life are seen again in this story. Death is a state of sleeping, whereas life is a state of wakefulness. The soul is the eternal spirit that gives life or death to a body. Life is more than a body that breathes air and death is more than a body that ceases to breathe air. The soul can only remain in a body of flesh that is capable of supporting human life. When the body has reached a point when a body is kept living, but not alive, the soul hovers near the body. This is a state of sleep, in a metaphysical sense. Should God restore the flesh to life, then the soul can return and a sleeping body (one said to have been dead) can again be alive. Therefore, when Jesus touched the hand of the little girl, her flesh was made whole and able to support life.

When Jesus said, “Get up!” speaking for the Father, the soul was rejoined with the rejuvenated body and she rose. This is a rebirth.

This awakening of the soul occurs in each reincarnation, where the Father tells a soul to be reborn anew. In one who has been eternally saved by the Father, the death of the body means the soul “Gets up!” in Heaven, leaving the body of flesh behind. Still, when this little girl got up after she had a body that was once no longer able to support life, just as when Lazarus rose from a longer death (when the ‘silver cord’ connecting the hovering soul to its body is severed after three days dead). It is the same as Jesus being resurrected after three days dead. The daughter of Jarius had been reborn for a Spiritual purpose in the worldly domain.

When we then read that Jesus “strictly ordered [the parents and his disciples] that no one should know this, and told [the parents] to give her something to eat,” this was because everyone present in that girl’s room knew she had risen from her deathbed. Jesus knew by the Mind of Christ that telling people, “Jesus raised my little daughter from death” would cause evil to raise its ugly head. A plot to kill Lazarus would surface after news spread that Jesus had raised him. The little daughter needed to be fed Spiritually by her parents, for her to live for God – taught the Word sent by He Who Gives Light. Therefore, Jairus and his wife and daughter were told to keep this truth within them; and all would do so, as all were made Saints by the presence of the Spirit of Yahweh, which came upon them all due to their faith.

As a selected Gospel reading for the sixth Sunday after Pentecost, when one’s personal ministry to Yahweh should be underway, it becomes vital for one’s faith be as strong as was Jairus’ and the woman whose hemorrhaging had kept her faith from being a blessing upon others for half her life. One who has faith desires to be in touch with God. A minister to Yahweh must know the value of having died of self, so one can be reborn as an extension of God’s Son, as Jesus resurrected within another body of flesh Anointed by Yahweh, as His Christ. The innocence of a child must be returned to a soul, for one’s faith to be put to use.

We read the request of Jairus, “Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well, and live,” and think Jesus had a healing touch that was a gift of God. However, we never see how Jesus laid his hands on the woman who was healed. Jesus told her, “Your faith has made you well.” Jesus held the hand of Jairus’ daughter when she got up, but Jesus was not holding the hand of Lazarus when he came from his tomb. It was the voice of God that spoke, commanding their souls to act with faith. Without faith in the one seeking healing, having someone lay on their hands will have the same effect as going to a doctor: you spend all you have and get no better.

The real meaning of the request by Jairus, which was heard by God and known by Jesus, was “Come and make my daughter be your hands on earth, so that she may be saved and alive with faith.” This is the prayer a minister has to make to God, when one offers himself or herself [self = soul] to Yahweh as His bride (regardless of one’s human gender). We have to die of self so that our flesh can be renewed in the hands of Jesus Christ. Jesus must lay his hands within ours, while we step aside as servants to God.

A ministry to the LORD then means that no matter how overcome with amazement one becomes, witnessing the miracles of God that occur around one, one is not to become boastful and proclaim, “Look here at what I have done!” A miracle is a private and personal matter. A miracle uplifts one’s faith.

Still, to God a miracle is just another day’s work done through one of His servants. People of faith simply “Go in peace” to serve Yahweh.

Thanks be to God!

Psalm 130 – A song of ascents for those souls fallen in battle

1 Out of the depths have I called to you, Yahweh;

adonay, hear my voice; *

let your ears consider well the voice of my supplication.

2 If you, Yah[weh], were to note what is done amiss, *

adonay, who could stand?

3 For there is forgiveness with you; *

therefore you shall be feared.

4 I wait for Yahweh; my soul waits for him; *

in his word is my hope.

5 My soul waits for adonay,

more than watchmen for the morning, *

more than watchmen for the morning.

6 O Israel, wait for Yahweh, *

for with Yahweh there is mercy;

7 With him there is plenteous redemption, *

and he shall redeem Israel from all their sins.

——————–

This is the Psalm selection that will be read aloud in unison or sung by a cantor as the accompaniment to the track 1 choice that has David’s Song of the Bow [2 Samuel] be the Old Testament reading choice. As such it will follow that, which states, “How the mighty have fallen.” Both will precede the Epistle reading from Second Corinthians, where Paul advised, “For if the eagerness is there, the gift is acceptable according to what one has– not according to what one does not have.” All will accompany the Gospel reading from Mark, where Jesus told Jarius, “Do not fear, only believe.”

This same Psalm was the Track 2 option for the second Sunday after Pentecost, just three Sundays back. Therefore, I will post here what I posted then, with minor adjustments made so it becomes relative to these different readings. The words written by David still bear the same meanings.

In this translation provided by the New Revised Standard Version [NRSV], there are eight presentations of the word “Lord.” The words written by David, which have all been assigned the exact same translation, are “Yahweh” and “adonay.” It is important to realize the differences these two words state. The name “Yahweh” states a personal relationship with God, as simply saying “Lord” is a statement that screams, “We do not know you, nor care to know you!” The word “adonay” means “lord” [in the lower case], where one’s “soul” is the “lord” that gives life to its flesh. A soul is not always [most likely not] married to “Yahweh,” such that a married to “Yahweh” soul becomes a production that is referred to as “Yahweh adonay,” equating to one of the “elohim.” Because both “Yahweh” and “adonay” are written in this “song of ascents” [announcement made in verse 1, but not translated], one can expect that the “lord” of David’s flesh was “Yahweh.”

Verse 1 then properly states: “Out of the depths I have cried to you Yahweh.” It is in verse 2 that David then wrote, “lord hear my voice! Let your ears be attentive to the voice of my supplications.” The NRSV shows this properly, but the Episcopal Church has taken it upon itself to place verse two’s language in verse 1.

Still, seeing ahead to this translation that truly says “lord,” one can intuit this as the cry of David’s soul to have his soul possessed by “Yahweh.” The word translating as “out of the depths” [in verse 1] is “mim·ma·‘ă·maq·qîm.” That should be read as reference to “the depths” that is metaphor David has used prior, for the sea of souls that are the hands of Yahweh. It is in the depths that the leviathan [Yahweh’s Spirit] becomes the “lord” over all flesh, whose souls have become Yahweh’s wives. Thus, “out of the depths” was David’s soul crying for salvation. His cries were sent to “Yahweh,” because David’s soul had committed to Him, making Him be his “lord.”

This means David writing, “hear my voice; let your ears consider well the voice of my supplication,” says prayers must be a spiritual wife’s clear channel of communication with the Husband Yahweh. A “supplication” is defined as: “the action of asking or begging for something earnestly or humbly.” This means such “cries” are made from a position of subservience and servitude, where a ‘slave’ has no right to demand anything from the Master. This is then the aspect of “ask and you shall receive.” While Yahweh knows one’s soul and knows one’s prayer before they are asked, it becomes the responsibility of the soul to establish a clear line of communication, where the wife is expected to state needs. Those truly married to Yahweh will make supplications for others, more than self.

Verse 3 [Episcopal Church 2] then says, “if iniquities you should mark Yah[weh] ; adonay , who could stand ?” Here, both “Yah” [an abbreviated form of “Yahweh”] and “lord” are written, with a semi-colon separating the two words. The separation says “Yahweh” is in the spiritual realm, where He keeps tabs on all sins and guilts possessed by souls in the physical realm. The semi-colon says the heavenly realm can never be a place where sins are allowed, thus the earth is the only allowable place where sins can exist. Following the semi-colon, the word “adonay” stands alone, with a comma mark following it. This says the soul is an extension of Yahweh, placed in the material world, such that it is the “lord” of an unmarried soul that causes iniquities and guilts to materialize. A “lord” alone, without marriage to “Yah,” is thereby always forced to ask, “who can stand?” No one can stand alone as “adonay” over oneself and ever get into heaven. In essence, David was asking, “Why would any soul not marry Yahweh?”

Verse 4 [Episcopal Church 3] translates to say, “when with you forgiveness , intent you may be feared .” The mistake of translating this as David writing, “For there is forgiveness with you; therefore you shall be feared” is it gives the impression that God simply existing means forgiveness comes without sacrifice of oneself to Him. This is a false impression to receive; but most Christian churches play gods by promising “belief in God” and “belief that Jesus died so your sins are forgiven” and “belief that everyone goes to heaven when they die because Jesus and God are all about love,” which are all misunderstandings of that which is written.

David writing “when with you” [“kî-‘im·mə·ḵā”] means what it says. The meaning of “with Yahweh” means a soul married to His Spirit. Only when that precondition has been met does “forgiveness” come. Without marrying one’s soul to Yahweh – AND THAT MEANS NO SINS, ONLY SERVICE TO GOD FOREVERAFTER – can one be forgiven for transgressions and be allowed into heaven, washed clean by His Spirit.

When David wrote “lə·ma·‘an,” which means “the intent” or “purpose” of “forgiveness,” the usage states a necessity, so one’s soul knows failure to be forgiven means a resulting fear of death and the fear of not being allowed to spend eternity in heaven with Yahweh. While a fear of God is the only fear allowed, such an allowance is not to fear the wrath of God when one sins, but to fear the loss of Yahweh if one turns away from Him and sins. When one’s soul is afraid of marriage to Yahweh, because one is afraid of losing all the worldly addictions one has become accustomed to – mostly being the addiction to self-worth and laziness to work for anything of true value – that fear is intended to be addressed through a spiritual union with Yahweh. Only with Yahweh’s help can a soul resist the temptations of the world that are projected upon a body of flesh.

Verse 5 [Episcopal Church 4] says, “I wait for Yahweh who waits for my soul , and in his word I await .” Unlike what the NRSV translates, the repetition of “waiting” [three times repeated] becomes a statement of “patience” being necessary. There is nothing stated that says “hope,” as “hō·w·ḥā·lə·tî” implies “hope” through the expectations of “waiting” patiently.

In the Hebrew written by David [“qiw·wî·ṯî Yah-weh qiw·wə·ṯāh nap̄·šî”], “Yahweh” is central to two uses of “await” [“qavah”]. This means “Yahweh” becomes the focus of which “I wait for” and it becomes “Yahweh” who “waits for my soul.” With “Yahweh” central, the soul has married Yahweh and then patiently does what Yahweh asks, knowing Yahweh waits patiently for an obedient soul to finish doing what He wants. While a soul is doing the work required by Yahweh, the strength and motivation comes from Scripture and an ability given by Yahweh to understand what He has said through His prophets.

[A good lesson that helps one realize the meaning of this verse is that which tells of Jacob working for Laban, based on his desire to marry Rachel. He ended up working fourteen years to get what he wanted, displaying an ability to “wait” and work.]

Verse 6 [Episcopal Church 5] then says, “my soul lord , more than those who keep watch for the dawning , more than those who keep daybreak .” In this, David admits his “soul” is the “lord” over his body of flesh. However, it is from the “patience” that that comes from a most holy agreement with Yahweh [the marriage Covenant] that has set expectations between a “soul” and “Yahweh.” From that, Yahweh can be intuited to be “my soul lord.” That makes the beginning of this verse be a statement confirming a spiritual marriage having taken place within David. Yahweh has become the “adonay” of David’s “soul.”

The repetition of “miš·šō·mə·rîm lab·bō·qer” [slight variation] should not become a perfect duplication of text because there is flexibility to amend the translations so they show difference. In both, David is saying that the “adonay” of his “soul” is Yahweh, which is “more than those” whose “soul lord” is themselves [or worse, a demonic possession]. The element of “keeping watch” must be seen as those who live in the darkness the night symbolizes, as there is no “day watch” necessary. The “watchmen” stand guard by night, when the majority of souls in flesh go to sleep and are unprotected from the things that come out at night.

For those who “watch for a dawning,” this symbolizes some sort of desire to see proof of Yahweh, through a miracle or a test placed before Yahweh. When “dawning” turns to “daybreak,” then the proof has been seen, but still not acted upon. Therefore, David was singing to the beauty of the light of Yahweh’s presence, which always makes keeping watch be a sign for a lack of commitment to Yahweh.

Verse 7 [Episcopal Church 6, bleeding into the first half of 7] then sings, “wait Israel , in Yahweh for with Yahweh mercy , and abundant with him redemption .” In this, there is separation placed after the word “Israel,” such that David was encouraging all who were supposed to be priests of Yahweh to wait and show patience. The world throws itself at all souls, hoping the immediacy of now will cause souls to act rashly; and, later finding regrets. Following the comma mark, David then repeated “Yahweh,” as “in Yahweh,” followed by “with Yahweh.” These repetition are recognitions of both belief (“in Yahweh”) and faith (“with Yahweh”). The former leads to the latter. The faith that comes from a soul marrying Yahweh then brings about the “mercy” of forgiveness, as well as the strength to show patience. For those who have fallen to the urges presented by the lures of the world, marriage to Yahweh makes available an “abundance” of forgiveness, allowing all souls the possibility of “redemption.”

The last verse [8, Episcopal Church 7b] says, “and he shall redeem Israel , from all its guilts .” In this, the Hebrew word translated as “shall redeem” is “yip̄·deh,” stemming from “padah.” The truth of “redeem” is to “ransom,” where there is a “price to pay.” The price of redemption is marriage and commitment, such that “Israel” is not a nation, but a collection of individuals considered truly to be the children of Yahweh. All are so noted with the expectation of service to Yahweh, with righteous lives meaning obedience to the Law [their marriage agreement]. This means the words of David do not apply to a land or a nation, but only to those souls who are redeemed through their souls having been merged with the Spirit of Yahweh. “Israel” then reflects in the same way as does “Christian,” where the name “Israel” means “He Is Upright” and a “Christian” is one “Anointed by Yahweh.” Only with the assistance of Yahweh can either exist and be released of all “guilts” or “sins.”

As the companion Psalm for the Song of the Bow, where David wrote into the Book of Jasher a song of lament for the deaths of Saul and Jonathan [and others of Saul’s family], this song of praise makes it clear that the only might that a human has that is lasting is the soul having married with Yahweh. The merging of “Yahweh” and “adonay” becomes a reflection of what true might is. It is when one’s soul has allowed Yahweh to become one’s “lord” or “adonay.” By knowing Jonathan was a “soul brother” of David, we can intuit his soul was likewise married to Yahweh. Jonathan went to his death bravely, not trying to defend is status as a prince, but out of duty for a king [his earthly father]. Jonathan was then a sacrificial lamb ordered slaughtered for the delight of a ruler; while Saul would cowardly commit suicide, rather than face his enemies’ swords. In that light, this song of praise sings of the promise of eternal life, when one’s soul has married Yahweh; and, the promise of reincarnation when there is all hell to pay for having rejected His hand in marriage.